Hidden markets: The new education privatization

Hidden Markets: The New Education Privatization

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-181

  Burch, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908962750     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203883945     Document Type: Book

References (267)

1. Agron, A. (2001, September). 7th privatization/contract services survey. American School and University Magazine, 27-31.
2. Ahearn, E. M., Lange, C. M., Rhim, L. M., and McLaughlin, M. J. (2001). Project SEARCH: Special education as requirements in charter schools. Final report of a research study: Cross-state analysis of fi ndings and summaries of state case studies. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
3. Alliance for Children, Inc. v. City of Detroit Public Schools, 475 F. Supp. 2d 655 (U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Michigan 2007).
4. American Home School Association. (2006). Resource listings from the National Home Education Network. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.americanhomeschoolassociation.org/ resources.html
5. American Institutes for Research, and Education Industry Association. (2005). The promise and challenge of supplemental educational services: The providers' perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.
6. Anagostopoulos, D., and Rutledge, S. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools: Charting the depth and drift of school and classroom change. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 2356-2372.
7. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
8. Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Apple, M. W. (2000). Offi cial knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
10. Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge.
11. Apple, M. W., and Pedroni, T. (2005). Conservative alliance building and African American support of vouchers. Teachers College Record, 107, 2068-2105.
12. Ball, S. J. (Ed.). (2005). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
13. Ball, S. J. (2006). Policy sociology and critical policy research. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball (p. 20). New York: Routledge.
14. Ball, S. J. (2007a). Education Plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. London: Routledge.
15. Ball, S. J. (2007b, September 5). Education PLC. Paper presented at the British Education Research Association. Institute of Education, London.
16. Bardach, E. (2005). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more eff ective problem solving (2nd ed., pp. 123-131). Berkeley, CA: CQ Press.
17. Basset, E., Burdt, C., Jackson, J., Gallagher, S., and Poroy, B. (2005, May). The education investor: First quarter 2005. Boston, MA: Eduventures.
18. Beales, J. (1994). Doing more with less: Competitive contracting for school support services. Los Angeles: The Reason Foundation.
19. Beales, J. R., and O'Leary, J. (1993). Making schools work: Contracting options for better management. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
20. Belfield, C. R., and Levin, H. M. (2002). Education privatization: Causes, consequences and planning implications (Fundamentals of Educational Planning, No.74). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization, International Institute for Educational Planning.
21. Black, P., and William, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must fi rst promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 20-50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Bogdan, R., and Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Bogdan, R., and Taylor, S. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: Wiley.
24. Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. (2001). NewLiberalSpeak: Notes on the new planetary vulgate. Radical Philosophy, 105, 2-5.
25. Bracey, G. W. (2002). The war against America's public schools: Privatizing schools, commercializing education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
26. Bradach, J., and Tempest, N. (2000). New schools venture fund. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
27. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
28. Brighouse, H. (2004). What's wrong with privatizing schools. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38, 629-630.
29. Bulkley, K. E. (2007). Bringing the private into the public: Changing the rules of the game and new regime politics in Philadelphia public education. Educational Policy, 21(1), 155-184.
30. Burch, P. (2006). The new educational privatization: Educational contracting in the era of high stakes accountability. Teachers College Record, 88(2), 129-135.
31. Burch, P. (2007a). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Craft ing a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84-95.
32. Burch, P. (2007b, March). The professionalization of instructional leadership in the United States: Competing values and current tensions. Journal of Educational Policy, 22(2), 195-214.
33. Burch, P. (2007c, May). Supplemental educational services under NCLB: Emerging evidence and policy issues. Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/documents/EPSL-0705- 232-EPRU.pdf.
34. Burch, P., and Hayes, T. (in press). The role of private fi rms in data-based decision-making. In T. Kowalski and T. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education. New York: Routledge.
35. Burch, P., Steinberg, M., and Donovan, J. (2007). Supplemental educational services and NCLB: Policy assumptions, market practices, emerging issues. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 115-133.
36. Burns, P. (2003). Regime theory, state government and a take-over of urban education. Journal of Urban Aff airs, 25, 285-303.
37. Cantelon, J. (2002, August 13). Virtual charter schools face opposition from unlikely source. CNSNews. com: Cybercast News Service. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.cnsnews.com/ ViewNation.asp?Page=//Nation//archive//200208//NAT20020813b.html.
38. Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The eff ectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88.
39. Center for Digital Government. (2002, October) Virtual schools forum report: A report on the virtual schools-A policy forum. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.centerdigitalgov.com/ center/media/DenverVSF_FINAL.doc.
40. Center on Education Policy. (2006, March). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, D.C: Center on Education Policy.
41. Chartwell Education Group. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.chartwelleducation.com/.
42. Chicago Public Schools. (2007). SES tutoring programs: An evaluation of year 3 in the Chicago Public Schools. Chicago: Chicago Public Schools.
43. Childress, S., and King, C. (2005, December). New schools venture fund in 2004: At a crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
44. Chubb, J. E., and Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
45. Clark, T. (2001, October). Virtual schools: Trends and issues; A study of virtual schools in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Wested, Distance Learning Resource Network.
46. Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management. (n.d.). Virtual schools. Trends and issues: School choice. Retrieved September 4, 2007, from http://eric.uoregon.edu/trends_issues/ choice/virtual_schools.html.
47. Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sense-making about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145.
48. Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211-244.
49. Cohen, D. K. (1982). Policy and organization: The impact of state and federal educational policy on school governance. Harvard Educational Review, 52(4), 474-499.
50. Collins, S. R. (2004). White Paper: e-Learning Frameworks for NCLB. Retrieved October 7, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/documents/S.
51. Collins-e-LearningFramework.pdf Committee for Education Funding. (2007). Budget response 2007. Washington, D.C.: Committee on Education Funding.
52. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center. (2006, April). Report on education service providers: Executive summary. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.
53. Confessore, N. (2003, July/August). Welcome to the machine: How the GOP disciplined K Street and made Bush supreme. Washington Monthly, 35(7/8), 30-37.
54. Congressional Research Service. (2006). Privatization and the federal government: An introduction. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs.
55. Coulson, A. J. (1999). Marketeducation: The unknown history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. CTB/McGraw Hill. (n.d.). K-12 products. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.ctb.com/ products/category_home.jsp.
56. Daniels, M. (2006). Reforming government through competition. Los Angeles: The Reason Foundation. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://www.reason.org/apr2006/apr2006_daniels.shtml
57. Davies, S., and Aurini, J. (2006). The franchising of private tutoring: A view from Canada. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 123-128.
58. Davis, M. R. (2003, April 16). Doing the "right" thing: The man in charge of making the No Child Left Behind Act a reality, a true-believer conservative, may be developing a taste for shades of gray. Ed Week. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ articles/2003/04/16/31hickok.
59. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. DiMaggio, P. D. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
61. Dutko Worldwide. (n.d.a). Practice Areas: Education. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.dutkoworldwide.com/.
62. Dutko Worldwide. (n.d.b). Latest News. Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.dutkoworldwide.com/media_center/latest_news/1048
63. eClassroom. (n.d.a). AbouteClassroom. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.eclassroom.com/ about/About.learn
64. eClassroom. (n.d.b). News. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.eclassroom.com/news/News. learn
65. eClassroom. (n.d.c). Products and services. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.eclassroom.com/products/Products.learn Author.
66. Edison Inc. (2003, September 9). 10-K. New York:
67. Educate Inc. (2004a). Annual Report: Form 10K. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.
68. Educate.com Educate Inc. (2004b, March 14). 10-K. Baltimore, MD: Author.
69. Educate Inc. (2006, March 16). 10-K. Baltimore, MD: Author.
70. Educate Inc. (2007a, March 16). 10-K. Baltimore, MD: Author.
71. Educate Inc. (2007b, April 3). 10-K. Baltimore, MD: Author.
72. Educate Inc. (2007c, May 10). 10-K. Baltimore, MD: Author.
73. Educate Inc. (2007d). Annual Report: Form 10K. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.educate.com.
74. Education Industry Association. (n.d.) Overview of the education industry association. Retrieved August 6, 2008, from http://www.educationindustry.org/tier.asp.
75. Education Industry Association. (2006). Enterprising educators. Newsletter of Education Industry Association, 15(2), 1.
76. Education Industry Association. (2008, January 8). Education principles and policies for the next U.S. president: Recommendations of the Education Industry Association. Rockville, MD: Author.
77. Education Industry Day. (n.d.) Highlights and program. Retrieved March 2006, from http://www.educationindustry.org/tier.asp?sid=4.
78. Edusoft . (n.d.). Description of product. Retrieved April 10, 2007, from http:///www.edusoft .com.
79. Eduventures. (2003, August). Learning markets and opportunities 2003: New models for delivering education and services drive pre-K-12 and postsecondary sector growth. Boston, MA: author.
80. Eduventures. (July 2006). Closing the achievement gap: Opportunity and improvement. Paper presented at the Education Industry Association Annual Conference, Denver, Colorado.
81. Elluminate. (n.d.) Elluminate community. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.elluminate.com/community/
82. Elmore, R. F. (2004a). Conclusion: The problem of stakes in performance-based accountability systems. In R. F. Elmore and S. H. Fuhrman (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 274-296). New York: Teachers College Press.
83. Elmore, R. F. (2004b). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
84. Elmore, R. F., and Fuller, B. (1996). Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Teachers College Press.
85. eSchool News. (2004, August 16). Grants to Bennett's K-12 Inc. challenged. eSchool News: Technology news for today's K-20 educator. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/ news/showstory.cfm?ArticleID=5220.
86. eSchool News. (2006, October 1). Virtual schools again in spotlight District-run online schools run afoul of state regulations. Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/ news/top-news/index.cfm?i=41301andCFID=1251340andCFTOKEN=68783391.
87. eSchool News: Technology news for today's K-20 educator. Retrieved September 4, 2007, from http:// www/eschoolnews.com/news/showStory.cfm?ArticleID=6610.
88. Farkas, G., and Durham, R. (2006, February 23-24). The role of tutoring in standards-based reform. Paper presented at the conference, Will Standards-Based Reform in Education Help Close the Poverty Gap? University of Wisconsin, Madison.
89. Feinberg, W., and Lubienski, C. (Eds). School choice policies and outcomes: Philosophical and empirical perspectives on limits to choice in liberal democracies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
90. Ferneding, K. A. (2003). Questioning technology: Electronic technologies and educational reform. New York: Peter Lang.
91. Fitz, J., and Beers, B. (2001, June). Education management organizations and the privatization of public education: A cross-national comparison of the USA and the UK (Occasional paper no. 22). New York: Columbia University, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
92. Flam, S., and Keane, W. (1997). Public schools/private Enterprise: What you should know and do about privatization. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
93. Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Florida Center for Reading Research. (n.d.). Wilson reading system. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.fcrr.org/FCRRReports/PDF/wilson.pdf.
95. Foley, E. (2001). Contradictions and control in system reform: The ascendancy of the central office in Philadelphia schools. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
96. Franklin, B. M., Bloch, M. N., and Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Educational partnerships and the state: The paradoxes of governing schools, children, and families. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
97. Fuhrman, S., and Elmore, R. F. (Eds.). (2004). Redesigning accountability systems for education. New York: Teachers College Press.
98. Fuhrman, S., Goertz, M., and Duff y, M. (2004). Slow down, you move too fast: The politics of making changes in high-stakes accountability policies for students. In S. Fuhrman and R. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 245-274). New York: Teachers College Press.
99. Gill, B., Hamilton, L., Lockwood, J., Marsh, J., Zimmer, R., Hill, D., et al. (2005). Inspiration, perspiration, and time: Operations and achievement in Edison schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
100. Gillborn, D. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 485-505.
101. Giroux, H. (2002). Schools for sale: Public education, corporate culture and the citizen-consumer. In A. Kohn and P. Shannon (Eds.), Education Inc: Turning learning into a business (pp. 105-118). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
102. Gold, E., Christman, J. B., and Harold, B. (in press). Blurring the boundaries: Private sector involvement in Philadelphia public schools. American Journal of Education.
103. Halverson, R., Prichett, R., Grigg, J., and Th omas, C. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Washington, D.C.
104. Hara, M. (2007). Everything has a price tag: Parent responses to supplemental educational services. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
105. Harvard Business School. (2000, October 13). Case 9-301-038. New schools venture fund. Cambridge, MA: Author.
106. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
107. Hassel, B. C., Godard, M. G., and Public Impact. (2004). How can virtual schools be a vibrant part of meeting the choice provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/ plan/2004/site/documents/Hassel-Terrell-VirtualSchools.pdf
108. Hassel, B. C., Godard Terrell, M., and Public Impact. (2004). U.S. increasing options through e-Learning. Paper presented at the Department of Education Secretary's No Child Left Behind Leadership Summit.
109. Hayes, T. (2007). Sea change: The proliferation of benchmark assessment systems in U.S. school districts. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
110. Heinrich, C. J., Meyer, R. H., and Whitten, G. (2007, November). Supplemental education services under No Child Left Behind: Who signs up, and what do they gain. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
111. Heistad, D. (2006). Analysis of 2005 supplemental educational services in Minneapolis public schools: An application of matched sample statistical design. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Public Schools.
112. Henig, J. R. (1989). Privatization in the United States: Th eory and practice. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 649-670.
113. Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
114. Henig, J. R., Holyoke, T., Lacreo-Paquet, N., and Mostner, M. (2003).Privatization, politics, and urban services: The political behavior of charter schools. Journal of Urban Aff airs, 25, 37-54.
115. Hentschke, G. C. (2005). New areas of educational governance: The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policymaking. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance, University of Southern California.
116. Hill, P. T., and Lake, R. (2006, September). Charter school governance. Paper presented at the National Conference on Charter School Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
117. Hill, P. T., Pierce, L. C., and Guthrie, J. W. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America's schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118. HomeSchoolChristian.com (n.d.a). Affi liates and advertisers. Retrieved August 2007 from http:// homeschoolchristian.com/allaffi liates.html.
119. HomeSchoolChristian.com. (n.d.b). Leadership position papers: K12 letter to local homeschoolers. Retrieved August 2007, from http://homeschoolchristian.com/Position/K12Letter.html.
120. Home School Legal Defense Association. (2002, June 26). The problem with home-based charter schools: HSLDA's position in the charter school debate. Current Issue Analysis. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000010/200206260.asp.
121. Home School Legal Defense Association. (2003, August). Virtual charter schools. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/Issues/C/CharterSchools.asp.
122. Honig, M. I. (2004). The new middle management: Intermediary organizations in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 65-87.
123. Human, D. (2007, February 19). Virtual schools face opposition from teachers: State considers legislation banning two of Ball State's charter schools. The Ball State Daily News Online. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://media.www.bsudailynews.com/media/storage/paper849/ news/2007/02/19/News/Virtual.Schools.Face.Opposition.From.Teachers-2727761.shtml.
124. Jackson, M., and Bassett, E. (2005). The state of the K-12 state assessment market. Boston: Eduventures.
125. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. London: Polity.
126. K-12. (2007a, July). Annual Report S-1. Herndon, VA: Author.
127. K-12. (2007b, December 10). S-1/A. Herndon, VA: Author.
128. K12. (n.d.) About K12. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.k12.com/about_k12/about_k12_ overview/index.html.
129. Klicka, C. J. (2002, January/February). Charter schools: The price is too high. The Home School Court Report, 17(1 ). Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/V18N1/ V18N101.asp.
130. Kozma, R., Zucker, A., Espinoza, C., McGhee, R., Yarnall, L., Zalles, D., and Lewis, A. (2000, November). The online course experience: Evaluation of the Virtual High School's third year of implementation, 1999-2000. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
131. Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2004). Do EMO-operated charter schools serve disadvantaged students? The infl uence of state policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(26). Retrieved from http:// epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n26/.
132. Learning Point Associates. (2002, April). E-Learning policy implications for K-12 educators and decision makers. Policy Issues, 11. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.ncrel.org/ policy/pubs/html/pivol11/apr2002d.htm.
133. Levin, H.M. (1987). Education as public and private good. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 641-643.
134. Levin, H. M. (2001). Privatizing education: can the marketplace deliver choice,effi ciency, equity, and social cohesion? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
135. Levin, H. (2006). Déjà vu all over again. Education Next, 6(2) 1-7.
136. Leys, C. (2003). Market-driven politics: Neoliberal democracy and the public interest. New York: Verso.
137. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Falmer.
138. Lipton, E. (2006, June 18). Former anti-terror officials find industry pays better. New York Times, p. 11. Retrieved Septmember 26, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/ washington/18lobby.html?_r=1andoref=slogin.
139. Macedo, S. (2006) Values, charters and choice. Presented at a conference hosted by the Spencer Foundation. Values and Evidence in Education Reform. Chicago. October 24-26.
140. Mandinach, E. B., Rivas, L., Light, D., Heinze, C., and Honey, M. (2006, April). The impact of datadriven decision making tools on educational practice: A systems analysis of six school districts. Paper prepared for the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
141. Mandlawitz, M. (2005). Education budget alert for fi scal year 2006. Washington, D.C.: Committee for Education Funding.
142. Marglin, S. (2008). The dismal science: How thinking like an economist undermines community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
143. Marlow, M. I. (2001). Bureaucracy and student performance in us public schools. Applied Economics, 33(10), 1341-1350.
144. McDonnell, L. (2005). NCLB and the Federal rolle in education: Evolution or revolution. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 19-38.
145. McLaughlin, M.W., Irby, M., and Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
146. Meier, D. (2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston: Beacon Press.
147. Metz, M. H. (1989). Real school: A universal drama amid disparate experience. Politics of Education Association Yearbook, 75-91.
148. Metz, M. H. (2008). Symbolic uses of NCLB: Reaffi rmation of equality of educational opportunity or delegitimization of public schools? In A. Sardovnik et al. (Eds.), No Child Left Behind and the reduction of the achievement gap: Sociological perspectives on federal educational policy. New York: Routledge.
149. Meyer, H. D., and Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany: SUNY Press.
150. Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
151. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., Strang, D., and Creighton, A. L. (1988). Bureaucratization without centralization: Changes in the organizational system of US public education, 1940-80. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns in organizations: Culture and environments (pp. 139-168). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
152. Mezias, S. J. (1990, September). An institutional model of organizational practice: Financial reporting at the Fortune 500. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 431-457.
153. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
154. Miller/McKeon discussion draft of ESEA reauthorization: Hearing before the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives, 110th Congress, 1st Session. (2007).
155. Molnar, A. (2005). School commercialism: From democratic ideal to market commodity. New York: Routledge.
156. Molnar, A., Wilson, G., and Allen, D. (2004, February). Profi les of for-profi teducation management companies: Sixth annual report. 2003-2004. Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University.
157. Murphy, J. T. (1996). The privatization of schooling: problems and possibilities. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
158. Murphy, J. T. (1991). Title I of ESEA: The politics of implementing federal education reform. In A. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 13-38). Albany: State University of New York Press.
159. Murphy, J. T., Glimer, S. W, Weise, R., and Page, A. (1998). Pathways to privatization in education. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
160. Nation At Risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington DC: The Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983.
161. National American Council for Online Learning. (n.d.). About NACOL. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.nacol.org/about/.
162. National Association of School Board Educators. (2001). Any time, any place, any path, any pace: Taking the lead on e-learning policy. Alexandria, VA: National Association of School Board Educators.
163. National Association of State Boards of Education. (2001). Any time, any place, any path, any pace: Taking the lead on e-learning policy. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved July 2006, from http://nasbe.org/Organization_Information/e_learning.pdf.
164. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006, September). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States: 2003-2004 (NCES Rep. No. 2006-329). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 19, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006329.
165. Newman, A. (2004). Closing the equity gap: Addressing NCLB compliance with access infrastructure soft ware. Boston: Eduventures.
166. New Schools Venture Fund. (n.d.a). About us. Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://www.newschools.org
167. New Schools Venture Fund. (n.d.b). Investment process. Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://www.newschools.org/work/investment-process.
168. Noam, G. (2002). After school education: Approaches to an emerging field. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
169. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 155 Stat. 1425 (2001).
170. Ogawa, R. T. (1992). Institutional theory and examining leadership in schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 6, 14-21.
171. O'Toole, L. Jr., and Meier, K. (2004). Parkinson's law and the new public management: Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 342-352.
172. Patrick, S. (June 2006). Clicking to class: The state of virtual schools. Converge Magazine. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.convergemag.com/story.php?id=101886.
173. Patrinos, H. A. (2005, October). Education contracting: Scope of future research. Paper prepared for the conference "Mobilizing the private sector for public education," A Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University-World Bank conference, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved October 2007, from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg/conferences/MPSPEpapers.htm.
174. Pearson. (n.d.) Our News. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from http:/www.pearson.com.
175. Pennsylvania Coalition of Charter Schools. (2007, June 11). Pennsylvania cyber charter schools and AYP: The complete story...Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.pachartercoalition.com/ main/news_information/news_20070611.html.
176. Potter, A., Ross, S. M., Paek, J., McKay, D., Ashton, J., and Sanders, W. L. (2007). Supplemental educational services in the state of Tennessee: 2005-06 (2004-2005 student achievement results). Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Center for Research in Education Policy.
177. Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
178. Princeton Review. (2004, December 3). 10-K. New York: Author.
179. Princeton Review. (2006). Annual Report. Retrieved August 2007, from www.10KWizard.org.
180. Princeton Review. (2007, April 2). 10-K. New York: Author.
181. Princeton Review. (2008, March 17). 10-K. New York: Author.
182. Reading School District v. Pennsylvania Department of Education, 875 A.2d 1218 (Pa. Commw. 2005).
183. Reich, R. (2007). Common schooling and educational choice as a response to pluralism. In W. Feinberg and C. Lubienski (Eds). School choice policies and outcomes: Philosophical and empirical perspectives on limits to choice in liberal democracies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
184. Renaissance Learning. Product overview. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from https://www.capitaliq.com/ CIQDotNet/company/longBusinessDescription.
185. Reason Foundation. (2006). Transforming government through privatization. Los Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation.
186. Rickles, J. H., and White, J. A. (2006). The impact of supplemental educational services participation on student achievement. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unifi ed School District.
187. Riding the Wave of Technology. (n.d.). District-wide applications. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.sandi.net/dwa/dwa_what.htm.
188. Riley, J. (2008, February 9). Movie man: An interview with Reed Hastings. Wall Street Journal, p. A9.
189. Rowan, B. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3), 283-314.
190. Rowan, B. (2006a). The school improvement industry in the United States: Why educational change is both pervasive and ineff ectual. In H. D. Meyer and B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 67-85). Albany: SUNY Press.
191. Rowan, B. (2006b). Varieties of institutional theory: Traditions and prospects for educational research. In H. D. Meyer and B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 15-33). Albany: SUNY Press.
192. Saltman, K. J. (2000). Collateral damage: Corporatizing public schools-A threat to democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
193. Saltman, K. J. (2005). The Edison schools: Corporate schooling and the assault on public education. New York: Routledge.
194. School Improvement Industry. (n.d.). Our editor's resume: Marc Dean Millot. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.siiwonline.com/Resume.html.
195. SchoolNet. Product description. Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http:www.schoolnet.org.
196. Sclar, E. (2000). You don't always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
197. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Second edition.
198. Scott, W. R., and Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
199. Scott, W. R., Meyer, J. W., and Boli, J. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
200. Sharkey, N. S., and Murnane, R. J. (2006, August). Tough choices in designing a formative assessment system. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 572-588.
201. Shaul, M. S. (2002, October). Public schools: Insuffi cient research to determine the eff ectiveness of selected private education companies (No. Document GAO-03-11). Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.
202. Shipps, D. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. The Teachers College Record, 99(1), 73-116.
203. Silverman, J. (February 6, 2007). Virtual charter school growing fast. Northwest News Channel 8. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.kgw.com/education/localeducation/stories/ kgw_020607_edu_charter_schools.58473753.html#.
204. Smith, K. B., and Meier, K. J. (1994). Politics, bureaucrats and schools. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 551-558.
205. Smith, M. L. (2004). Political spectacle and the fate of American schools: Symbolic politics and educational policies. New York: Routledge Falmer.
206. Smith, S., and Lipsky, M. (1999). Non-profi ts for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Contemporary Sociology, 23(4), 584-585.
207. Southern Regional Education Board. (1999). Distance learning policy laboratory: Current initiatives and priority issues. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.electroniccampus.org/policylab/ docs/initiatives.asp.
208. Spillane, J. P. (1998, Spring). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33-63.
209. Spillane, J. P., and Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and the technical core in K-12 schools: "Loose coupling" revisited. In H. D. Meyer and B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 89-100). Albany: SUNY Press.
210. Spillane, J. P., and Th ompson, C. L. (1997, Summer). Restructuring conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185-203.
211. Stambach, A., and David, M. (2005). Feminist theory and education policy: How gender has been 'involved' in school choice debates. Signs, 30, 1633-1658.
212. Starr, P. (1988). The meaning of privatization. Yale Law and Policy Review, 6(1), 6-41.
213. Stein, M. (2004). Testing in fl ux: Future directions in the pre-K-12 assessment market. Boston: Eduventures.
214. Stein, M., and Bassett, E. (2004a). Staying ahead of the curve: A value chain analysis of the K-12 assessment market. Boston: Eduventures.
215. Stein, M., and Bassett, E. (2004b). Uncovering K-12 professional development opportunities. Boston: Eduventures.
216. Steinberg, M. (2006). Private educational services: Whom does the market leave behind? Policy Matters, 4(1), 17-22.
217. Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
218. Stoneman, C. (2000, February 23). Title I and parent information resource center. First Annual Review of the Family Involvement in Education. Washington, D.C.: The National Coalition for Parent Involvement in Education.
219. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
220. Stricker, N. (2007, February 17). Push for virtual charter school: Education proposal irks state board. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://sltrib.com/portlet/article/ html/fragments/print_article.jsp?articleId=5248205andsiteId=297.
221. Stullich, S., Eisner, E., McCrary, J., and Roney, C. (2006). National assessment of Title I: Vol.1. Implementation of Title I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
222. Sunderman, G. L. (2006). Do supplemental educational services increase opportunities for minority students? Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 117-122.
223. Sunderman, G. L., and Kim, J. (2004). Increasing bureaucracy or increasing opportunities? School districtexperience with supplemental educational services. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
224. Sunderman, G. L., and Kim, J. S. (2006). Implementing supplemental educational services: Implications for school districts and educational opportunity. In K. K. Wong and S. Rutledge (Eds.), Systemwide eff orts to improve student achievement. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
225. Sunderman, G. L., Kim, J. S., and Orfield, G. (2005). NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
226. Sunderman, G. L., and Orfield, G. (2006). Domesticating a revolution: No Child Left Behind reforms and state administrative response. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 526-556.
227. Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. (Eds.). (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: Wiley.
228. teachnology (n.d.). Current trends in education: School choice. Retrieved August, 2007, from http:// teach-nology.com/currenttrends/school_choice/.
229. The White House. (n.d.). Head Start policy book: President Bush's plan to prepare all children for kindergarten: Where are we now? Retrieved October 2007, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/ infocus/earlychildhood/hspolicybook/01.html.
230. Trotter, A. (2007, March 29). Getting up to speed. Edweek, pp. 10-16.
231. Tucker, B. (2007, June). Laboratories of reform: Virtual high schools and innovation in public education. Washington, D.C.: Education Sector. Retrieved October 2007, from http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=502307.
232. U.S. Department of Education. (2001a). Enhancing education through technology act of 2001. Retrieved June 2, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html.
233. U.S. Department of Education. (2001b). NCLB overview. Retrieved June 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html.
234. U.S. Department of Education. (2001c). Title I: Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged.Sec. 1111 (j). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
235. U.S. Department of Education. (2001d). Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title II, Part D-Enhancing Education Th rough Technology. Retrieved October 7, 2007, from www.ed.gov/policy/elsec.
236. U.S. Department of Education. (2002a). President Bush unveils new guidance empowering faith-based and community groups to provide extra academic help to low-income students. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2002/12/12122002.html.
237. U.S. Department of Education. (2002b, September). No Child Left Behind: A desktop reference, 2002. Washington, D.C.: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf.
238. U.S. Department of Education. (2002c, December). Federal Register Vol. 67, No. 231. Title I. Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged. Final Regulations. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
239. U.S. Department of Education. (2003a). No Child Left Behind: Supplemental educational services, non-regulatory guidance (Final draft .). Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/ choice/help/ses/guidance.html.
240. U.S. Department of Education. (2003b, September). Report cards: Title I, Part A Nonregulatory guidance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 2007, from http:// doe.sd.gov/ofm/grants/LEAapp/docs/Report%20Cards%20Guidance.pdf.
241. U.S. Department of Education. (2003c). Title IA services for private school children: Non-regulatory guidance (p. 5). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office .
242. U.S. Department of Education. (2003d). Supplemental educational services. Non-regulatory guidance. Retrieved August 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/choice/help/ses/guidance.html.
243. U.S. Department of Education (2004a). SES Policy Letter in Reference to LEA Conditions on Providers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 2006, from http:// www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guidance/stateletters/choice.
244. U.S. Department of Education. (2004b). Evaluation of Title I accountability systems and school improvementeff orts (TASSIE): First year technical appendix. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service.
245. U.S. Department of Education. (2004c, July). The impact of the new Title I requirements on charter schools: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/charterguidance03.pdf.
246. U.S. Department of Education. (2004d, September). Choosing a school for your child. Washington, D.C.: Office of Innovation and Improvement. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/education/choosingschool/choosingschool.htm.
247. U.S. Department of Education. (2004e, July). The impact of the new Title I requirements on charter schools: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/charterguidance03.pdf.
248. U.S. Department of Education. (2005a). Supplemental education services non-regulatory guidance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/supsvcguid.
249. U.S. Department of Education (2005b). No Child Left Behind. Supplemental educational services: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
250. U.S. Department of Education. (2005c). Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. (Sec C3, VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
251. U.S. Department of Education (2006a). Question and answer on the participation of private schools in providing supplemental education services (SES) under No Child Left Behind. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Retrieved March 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/ elsec/guid/cnpe/sesguidance.html.
252. U.S. Department of Education. (2006b). Letter to chief state school officer on district affi liated entities serving as an SES provider. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Retrieved March, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/.
253. U.S. Department of Education. (2007, August) Improving basic programs operated by local education agencies. Title I, Part A, Sec 1003. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Retrieved December 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/.
254. Villano, M. (2006). Assessing formative assessment. Technology and Learning, 26(6), 8-12.
255. Virtual Sage, and Connections Academy. (May 16, 2006). Connections Academy and Virtual Sage announce agreement: Leading virtual public school provider to license custom high school courses. Retrieved August 2007, from http://www.connectionsacademy.com/pdfs/20060516_VirtualSageAgreement.pdf.
256. Ware, A. (1989). Between profi t and state: Intermediate organizations in Britain and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
257. Washington Parents Association. (2003, February 27). Fact sheet: How virtual charter schools threaten public schools. Retrieved August 20, 2007, from http://www.homeschooling-wpa.org.
258. Wayman, J. C., and Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549-571.
259. Wells, A. S. (2002). Why public policy fails to live up to the potential of charter school reform: An introduction. In A. Stuart Wells (Ed.), Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity (pp. 1-28). New York: Teachers College Press.
260. Wenger, Y. M. H., Mindy B. (2007, February 6). Online class bill heads to Senate: Poor students largely left out, Democrats say. Northwest NewsChannel 8. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.kgw.com/education/localeducation/stories/kgw_020607_edu_Charter_ schools.58473753.html/.
261. Whitty, G. (1997). Creating quasi-markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education, 22, 3-47.
262. Whitty, G., Power, S., and Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
263. Williams, W. (1982). The study of implementation. In W. Williams (Ed.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues (pp. 1-17). Chatham, NJ: Chatham Press.
264. Wisconsin Education Association Education Council v. Northern Osaukee School District, 2006AP1380, p. 12 (December 5, 2007).
265. Wong, K. K., and Rutledge, S. (Eds.). System-wide eff orts to improve student achievement. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
266. Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Razquin, P., Booker, K., and Lockwood, J. R. (2007). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Vol. 1. Title I school choice, supplemental educational services, and student achievement. Washington, D.C.: RAND.
267. Zucker, L. (Ed.). (1988). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.