Asymmetries in premating isolating mechanisms in a sympatric species flock of pupfish (Cyprinodon)

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 69-75

  Kodric Brown, Astrid ^a   West, Rhiannon J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Detritivore; Frequency dependent selection; Olfactory cues; Scale eater; Sympatric speciation; Visual cues

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRY; CONSPECIFIC; CYPRINID; DETRITIVORY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; ISOLATED POPULATION; MORPHOLOGY; OLFACTORY CUE; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY; VISUAL CUE;

BAHAMAS; CENTRAL LUZON; LUZON; PHILIPPINES; SAN SALVADOR ISLAND; ZAMBALES;

EID: 84890634130     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/art087     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arnegard ME, Kondrashov AS. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution. 58:222-237.
2. Barluenga M, Stoelting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature. 439:719-723.
3. Barton M, Barton C. 2008. Pupfishes of the Bahamas. J Am Killifish Assoc. 41:161-171.
4. Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M. 2012. The relationship between intraspecific assortative mating and reproductive isolation between divergent populations. Curr Zool. 58:482-492.
5. Covich A, Stuiver M. 1974. Changes in the oxygen 18 as a measure of long-term fluctuations in tropical lake levels and molluscan populations. Limnol Oceanogr. 19:682-691.
6. Coyne JA. 2007. Sympatric speciation. Curr Biol. 17:R787-R788.
7. Elmer KR, Kusche H, Lehtonen TK, Meyer A. 2010a. Local variation and parallel evolution: morphological and genetic diversity across a species complex of neotropical crater lake cichlid fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:1763-1782.
8. Elmer KR, Lehtonen TK, Kautt AF, Harrod C, Meyer A. 2010b. Rapid sympatric ecological differentiation of crater lake cichlid fishes within historic times. BMC Biol. 8:60.
9. Elmer KR, Lehtonen TK, Meyer A. 2009. Color assortative mating contributes to sympatric divergence of neotropical cichlid fish. Evolution. 63:2750-2757.
10. Fryer G, Iles TD. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the great lakes of Africa: their biology and evolution. Edinburgh (UK): Oliver and Boyd.
11. Fryer GP, Greenwood H, Trevavas F. 1955. Scale-eating habits of African cichlid fishes. Nature. 175:1089-1090.
12. Gavrilets S. 2003. Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution. 57:2197-2215.
13. Herder F, Pfaender J, Schliewen UK. 2008. Adaptive sympatric speciation of polychromatic "roundfin" sailfin silverside fish in Lake Matano (Sulawesi). Evolution. 62:2178-2195.
14. Holtmeier CL. 2001. Heterochrony, maternal effects, and phenotypic variation among sympatric pupfishes. Evolution. 55:330-338.
15. Horstkotte J, Strecker U. 2005. Trophic divergence in the phylogenetically young Cyprinodon species flock (Cyprinodontidae, Teleostei) from Laguna Chichancanab (Mexico). Biol J Linn Soc. 85:125-134.
16. Humphries JM, Miller RR. 1981. A remarkable species flock of pupfishes, genus Cyprinodon, from Yucatan, Mexico. Copeia. 1981:52-64.
17. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 411:302-305.
18. Kahn AT, Mautz B, Jennions MD. 2010. Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish. Biol Lett. 6:55-58.
19. Kekalainen J, Valkama H, Huuskonen H, Taskinen J. 2010. Multiple sexual ornamentation signals male quality and predicts female preference in minnows. Ethology. 116:895-903.
20. Kodric-Brown A. 1998. Sexual dichromatism and temporary color changes in the reproduction of fishes. Amer Zool. 38:70-81.
21. Kodric-Brown A, Strecker U. 2001. Responses of Cyprinodon maya and C. labiosus females to visual and olfactory cues of conspecific and heterospecific males. Biol J Linn Soc. 74:541-548.
22. Kozak HI, Cirino LA, Ptacek MB. 2008. Female mating preferences for male morphological traits used in species and mate recognition in the Mexican sailfin mollies, Poecilia velifera and Poecilia petenensis. Behav Ecol. 19:463-474.
23. Landry L, Vincent WF, Bernatchez L. 2007. Parallel evolution of lake whitefish dwarf ecotypes in association with limnological features of their adaptive landscape. J Evol Biol. 20:971-984.
24. Langerhans RB, De Witt TJ. 2004. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Biol. J Linn Soc.74:541-548.
25. Leithen K, Gonigle M, Mazzucco R, Otto SP, Dieckmann U. 2012. Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence. Nature. 484: 506-509.
26. Lehtonen TK, Rintakoski S, Lindström K. 2007. Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behav Ecol.18:696-700.
27. Maan ME, Cummings ME. 2008. Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution. 62:2334-2345.
28. Maan ME, Seehausen O. 2011. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol Lett. 14:591-602.
29. Martin CH, Wainwright PC. 2011. Trophic novelty is linked to exceptional rates of morphological diversification in two adaptive radiations of Cyprinodon pupfish. Evolution. 65:2197-2212.
30. Martin CH, Wainwright PC. 2013. Multiple fitness peaks on the adaptive landscape drive adaptive radiation in the wild. Science. 339:208-211.
31. McKaye KR. 1986. Mate choice and size assortative pairing by the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloa, Nicaragua. J Fish Biol. 29:135-150.
32. Mendelson TC, Williams TH. 2011. Female preference for male coloration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. Anim Behav. 82:683-689.
33. Merrill RM, Wallbank RWR, Bull V, Salazar PCA, Mallet J, Stevens M, Jiggins CD. 2012. Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue. Proc R Soc B. 278:4907-4913.
34. Milliken KT, Anderson JB, Rodriguez AB. 2008. A new composite Holocene sea-level curve for the northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Anderson JB, Rodriguez AB, editors. Response of Gulf Coast Estuaries to sea-level rise and climate change. Boulder (CO): Geological Society of America (Special Paper 443). p. 1-11.
35. Minitab 16 Statistical Software 2010. [Computer software]. State College (PA): Minitab, Inc. (www.minitab.com).
36. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. 2006. Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:9090-9095.
37. Pacheco PJ, Foradas JG. 1986. Holocene environmental changes in the interior karst region of San Salvador, Bahamas; the Granny Lake pollen record. Proc Symp Geo Bah. 3:115-122.
38. Rafferty NE, Boughman JW. 2006. Olfactory mate recognition in a sympatric species pair of three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol. 17:965-970.
39. Reynolds RG, Fitzpatrick BM. 2007. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution. 61:2253-2259.
40. Robinson DM, Tudor MS, Morris MR. 2011. Female preference and the evolution of an exaggerated male ornament: the shape of the preference function matters. Anim Behav. 81:1015-1021.
41. Rosenthal GG, Evans CS. 1998. Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:4431-4436.
42. Rudh A, Rogell B, Håstad O, Qvarnström A. 2011. Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation between coloration and sexual display in strawberry poison frogs. Evolution. 65:1271-1282.
43. Rundle HD, Vamosi SM, Schluter D. 2003. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:14943-14948.
44. Sazima I. 1983. Scale-eating in characoids and other fishes. Env Biol Fish. 9:87-101.
45. Schliewen U, Rassmann K, Markmann M, Markert J, Kocher T, Tautz D. 2001. Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Mol Ecol. 10:1471-1488.
46. Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
47. Seehausen O. 2006. African cichlid fish: a model system in adaptive radiation research. Proc Biol Sci. 273:1987-1998.
48. Seehausen O, Terai Y, Magalhaes IS, Carleton KL, Mrosso HD, Miyagi R, van der Sluijs I, Schneider MV, Maan ME, Tachida H, et al. 2008. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature. 455:620-626.
49. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? Trends Ecol Evol. 26:389-397.
50. Strecker U. 2006. Genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation in a Cyprinodon fish species flock from Laguna Chichancanab, Mexico. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 39:865-872.
51. Strecker U, Kodric-Brown A. 1999. Mate recognition systems in a species flock of Mexican pupfish. J Evol Biol. 12:927-935.
52. Strecker U, Kodric-Brown A. 2000. Mating preferences in a species flock of Mexican pupfishes (Cyprinodon, Teleostei). Biol J Linn Soc. 71:677-687.
53. Turner BJ, Duvernell DD, Bunt TM, Barton MG. 2008. Reproductive isolation among endemic pupfishes (Cyprinodon) on San Salvador Island, Bahamas: microsatellite evidence. Biol J Linn Soc. 95:566-582.
54. Vamosi SM. 2005. On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Can J Zool. 83:894-910.
55. Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J. 2004. The effects of habitat-and dietbased cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol. 15:925-929.
56. Weissing FJ, Edelaar P, van Doorn GS. 2011. Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 65:461-480.
57. Young MJ, Simmons LW, Evans JP. 2010. Pre-and post-mating sexual selection both favor large males in rainbowfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 64:915-925.