The current state of medical simulation in interventional cardiology: A clinical document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention's (SCAI) Simulation Committee

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 37-46

  Green, Sandy M ^a   Klein, Andrew J ^b   Pancholy, Samir ^c   Rao, Sunil V ^d   Steinberg, Daniel ^e   Lipner, Rebecca ^f   Marshall, Jeffery ^g   Messenger, John C ^h  

^a GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Geisinger Health Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^f AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^g Northeast Georgia Medical Center   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

angiography coronary; intervention; percutaneous coronary; transradial cath; valvular heart disease; vascular access complications

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CERTIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SIMULATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULAR SURGERY;

ANGIOGRAPHY CORONARY; INTERVENTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; TRANSRADIAL CATH; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; VASCULAR ACCESS COMPLICATIONS;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 84890554334     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25048     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Norlin K,. Flight Simulation Software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, 1995. NASA Technical Memorandum 104315.
2. Quigley H,. Flight and simulation investigation of methods for implementing noise-abatement landing approaches. In: Administration NASA, editor, United States: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970. NASA Technical Memoranda N091-016
3. Reznick RK,. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 358-361.
4. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 458-463; discussion 463-464.
5. Administration F. Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification (FSTD), 2012.
6. Darzentas J,. Simulation of road traffic conflicts at T-junctions. Simulation 1980: 155-164.
7. Knowles M,. Informal adult education; a guide for administrators, leaders, and teachers. New York: Association Press, 1950.
8. Knowles M,. Higher adult education in the United States; the current picture, trends, and issues. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Committee on Higher Adult Education, 1969.
9. Knowles M,. The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Revised and Updated edition. Wilton Connecticut, Chicago: Association Press; Follett Publishing Company, 1980.
10. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999; 282: 861-866.
11. Issenberg SB, Scalese RJ,. Simulation in health care education. Perspect Biol Med 2008; 51: 31-46.
12. Lipner RS, Messenger JC, Kangilaski R, et al. A technical and cognitive skills evaluation of performance in interventional cardiology procedures using medical simulation. Simul Healthc 2010; 5: 65-74.
13. Aggarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ,. Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 588-593.
14. Berry M, Hellstrom M, Gothlin J, Reznick R, Lonn L,. Endovascular training with animals versus virtual reality systems: An economic analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 233-238.
15. Bridges M, Diamond DL,. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 28-32.
16. Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP,. Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1514-1518.
17. Gallagher AG, Cates CU,. Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: What this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA 2004; 292: 3024-3026.
18. Gould DA, Reekers JA, Kessel DO, et al. Simulation devices in interventional radiology: Validation pending. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 215-216.
19. Gould DA, Reekers JA, Kessel DO, et al. Simulation devices in interventional radiology: Caveat emptor. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29: 4-6.
20. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C, et al. The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med 2006; 81: 919-924.
21. Wagenblast AL, Adamsen S, Drewes AM, Rosenberg J, Jensen PM, Grantcharov TP,. Quality control of endoscopic performance using virtual reality computer simulation. Ugeskr Laeger 2004; 166: 4363-4365.
22. Duncan JR, Kline B, Glaiberman CB,. Analysis of simulated angiographic procedures. Part 2: Extracting efficiency data from audio and video recordings. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18: 535-544.
23. Giora Weisz J, Ramee S, Gray W,. The use of interventional cardiovascular simulation to evaluate operator performance: The carotid Assessment of operator performance by the Simbionix carotid StEnting Simulator Study (ASSESS). J Soc Simul Healthc 2007; 2: 81.
24. Neequaye SK, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ,. Endovascular skills training and assessment. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 1055-1064.
25. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, et al. Experienced endovascular interventionalists objectively improve their skills by attending carotid artery stent training courses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 541-550.
26. Adamsen S, Funch-Jensen PM, Drewes AM, Rosenberg J, Grantcharov TP,. A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 229-234.
27. Reznek M, Harter P, Krummel T,. Virtual reality and simulation: Training the future emergency physician. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 78-87.
28. Wong T, Foale R, Schilling R,. Validation of a novel computerized permanent pacemaker implantation simulator. J Am Coll Cardiol Suppl 2001; 37: 493a-494a.
29. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, Darzi A, Vermassen F, Cheshire NJ,. Cognitive training improves clinically relevant outcomes during simulated endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 1223-1230, 1230 e1.
30. Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Bicknell C, et al. Patient-specific simulation in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 1700-1705.
31. Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Harvey K, et al. Efficient implementation of patient-specific simulated rehearsal for the carotid artery stenting procedure: Part-task rehearsal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 158-166.
32. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Cheshire NJ, Vermassen FE,. Recent Advancements in Medical Simulation: Patient-Specific Virtual Reality Simulation. World J Surg 2012; 36: 1703-1712.
33. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS, et al. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 336-341.
34. Maroney J, Khan S, Powell W, Klein LW,. Current operator volumes of invasive coronary procedures in medicare patients: Implications for future manpower needs in the catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 81: 34-39.
35. De Ponti R, Marazzi R, Ghiringhelli S, Salerno-Uriarte JA, Calkins H, Cheng A,. Superiority of simulator-based training compared with conventional training methodologies in the performance of transseptal catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 359-363.
36. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 2001; 286: 1317-1324.
37. Anderson PL, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, et al. Understanding trends in inpatient surgical volume: Vascular interventions, 1980-2000. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 1200-1208.
38. Nowygrod R, Egorova N, Greco G, et al. Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 205-216.
39. Roubin GS,. Angioplasty and stenting should not be restricted to clinical trials. Stroke 2002; 33: 2520-2522.
40. Patel AD, Gallagher AG, Nicholson WJ, Cates CU,. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1796-1802.
41. US Food and Drug Administration CFDARH, Medical Devices Advisory Committee, Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting, 2004.
42. Rosenfield K,. Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting-multispecialty consensus recommendations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 1-11.
43. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, Brightwell R, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ,. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 855-863.
44. Cates CU, Patel AD, Nicholson WJ,. Use of virtual reality simulation for mission rehearsal for carotid stenting. JAMA 2007; 297: 265-266.
45. Dawson DL,. Virtual reality training for carotid intervention. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007; 3: 470-471.
46. Roguin A, Beyar R,. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 279-282.
47. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, et al. Patient-specific endovascular simulation influences interventionalists performing carotid artery stenting procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41: 492-500.
48. Nicholson WJ, Cates CU, Patel AD, et al. Face and content validation of virtual reality simulation for carotid angiography: Results from the first 100 physicians attending the Emory NeuroAnatomy Carotid Training (ENACT) program. Simul Healthc 2006; 1: 147-150.
49. Dawson DL,. Training in carotid artery stenting: Do carotid simulation systems really help? Vascular 2006; 14: 256-263.
50. Neequaye SK, Aggarwal R, Brightwell R, Van Herzeele I, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ,. Identification of skills common to renal and iliac endovascular procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 525-532.
51. Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Lin SC, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 343-352.
52. Dawson DL, Lee ES, Hedayati N, Pevec WC,. Four-year experience with a regional program providing simulation-based endovascular training for vascular surgery fellows. J Surg Educ 2009; 66: 330-335.
53. Gould D, Patel A, Becker G, et al. SIR/RSNA/CIRSE joint medical simulation task force strategic plan executive summary. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: S284-S286.