Patient-specific endovascular simulation influences interventionalists performing carotid artery stenting procedures

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 492-500

  Willaert, W I M ^a   Aggarwal, R ^a   Van Herzeele, I ^b   O'Donoghue, K ^a   Gaines, P A ^c   Darzi, A W ^a   Vermassen, F E ^b   Cheshire, N J ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carotid artery stenting; Endovascular; Minimally invasive surgery; Procedure rehearsal; Simulation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CARDIOLOGIST; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CATHETER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGIST; SURGEON; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CAROTID STENOSIS; CATHETERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79953049996     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: 15322165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. US Food and Drug Administration Centre for Devices and Radiological Health Medical Devices Advisory Committee Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting, http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/04/transcripts/4033t1.htm; 2004.
2. Hsu JH, Younan D, Pandalai S, Gillespie BT, Jain RA, Schippert DW, et al. Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg 2004;40(6):1118-25. (Pubitemid 40037279)
3. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, Darzi A, Vermassen F, Cheshire NJ. Cognitive training improves clinically relevant outcomes during simulated endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 2008;48(5):1223-30.
4. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, Hamady M, Cleveland T, Darzi A, et al. Experienced endovascular interventionalists objectively improve their skills by attending carotid artery stent training courses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35(5):541-50. (Pubitemid 351469947)
5. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, Brightwell R, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 2007;46(5):855-63. (Pubitemid 350011212)
6. Neequaye SK, Aggarwal R, Brightwell R, Van Herzeele I, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ. Identification of skills common to renal and iliac endovascular procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33(5):525-32. (Pubitemid 46547481)
7. Chaer RA, DeRubertis BG, Lin SC, Bush HL, Karwowski JK, Birk D, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention e results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 2006;244:343-52.
8. Hislop SJ, Hedrick JH, Singh MJ, Rhodes JM, Gillespie DL, Johansson M, et al. Simulation case rehearsals for carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38(6):750-4.
9. Cates CU, Patel AD, Nicholson WJ. Use of virtual reality simulation for mission rehearsal for carotid stenting. JAMA 2007;297 (3):265-6. (Pubitemid 46143303)
10. Krebs WK, McCarley JS, Bryant EV. Effects of mission rehearsal simulation on air-to-ground target acquisition. Hum Factors 1999;41(4):553-8. (Pubitemid 30194420)
11. http://www.nasa.gov/mission-pages/NEEMO/
12. Roguin A, Beyar R. Real case virtual reality training prior to carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75(2):279-82.
13. Verzini F, De Rango P, Parlani G, Panuccio G, Cao P. Carotid artery stenting: technical issues and role of operators' experience. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2008;20(3):247-57.
14. Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G, Hartmann M, et al. SPACE Collaborative Group. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006;368(9543):1239-47.
15. Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, Berger J, Fraedrich G, Hacke W, et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(10):893-902.
16. European Stroke Conference. ICSS: carotid endarterectomy superior to stenting, at least in the short term, www.medscape.com/viewarticle/703471; 2009.
17. Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Bignamini A, Bolognese L, Briganti F, Di Sciascio G, et al. Carotid artery stenting: first consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD joint committee. Stroke 2006;37(9):2400-9. (Pubitemid 44339440)
18. Macdonald S, Lee R, Williams R, Stansby G. Delphi Carotid Stenting Consensus Panel. Towards safer carotid artery stenting: a scoring system for anatomic suitability. Stroke 2009;40(5):1698-703.
19. Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Nestel D, et al. Patient-specific simulation for endovascular procedures: qualitative evaluation of the development process. Int J Med Robot 2010;6(2):202-10.
20. Maurer T, Pierce H. A comparison of likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. J Appl Psychol 1998;83:324-9.
21. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Malik I, Gaines P, Hamady M, Darzi A, et al. European Virtual Reality Endovascular Research Team EVEResT. Validation of video-based skill assessment in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38(1):1-9.
22. Stadie AT, Kockro RA, Reisch R, Tropine A, Boor S, Stoeter P, et al. Virtual reality system for planning minimally invasive neurosurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2008;108(2):382-94. (Pubitemid 351213308)
23. Soler L, Delingette H, Malandain G, Ayache N, Koehl C, Clément JM, et al. An automatic virtual patient reconstruction from CT-scans for hepatic surgical planning. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000;70:316-22.
24. Madhwal S, Rajagopal V, Bhatt DL, Bajzer CT, Whitlow P, Kapadia SR. Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:200-2004.
25. Sayeed S, Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, Makaroun MS. Angiographic lesion characteristics can predict adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:81-7.
26. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, et al. EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355(16):1660-71. (Pubitemid 44583956)
27. Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, Albucher JF, Rousseau H, Viguier A, et al. EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(10):885-92.
28. Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P, Scicli A, Fairman R, Wholey M, et al. The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69(3):341-8. (Pubitemid 46339273)
29. Theiss W, Hermanek P, Mathias K, Brückmann H, Dembski J, Hoffmann FJ, et al. German Society of Angiology/Vascular MedicineGerman Society of Radiology. Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data. Stroke 2008;39(8):2325-30.
30. Coward LJ, McCabe DJ, Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Clifton A, Brown MM. CAVATAS Investigators. Long-term outcome after angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis compared with medical treatment in the Carotid And Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Stroke 2007;38(5):1526-30. (Pubitemid 46684169)
31. Patel AD, Gallagher AG, Nicholson WJ, Cates CU. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(9):1796-802.
32. Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, Simon R, Jay GD, Berns SD. MedTeams Consortium. The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34(3):373-83. (Pubitemid 29416031)
33. Crew Resource Management (CRM). Training guidance for flight crew, CRM instructors (CRMIS) and CRM instructor-examiners (CRMIES); 2006. www.caa.co.uk.
34. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears RL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 2002;37(6):1553-81. (Pubitemid 36070254)