Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.004);Endovascular Training with Animals versus Virtual Reality Systems: An Economic Analysis

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 233-238

  Berry, Max ^a,b   Hellström, Mikael ^a   Göthlin, Jan ^a   Reznick, Richard ^c   Lönn, Lars ^a,b  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; LABORATORY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 38349193459     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.025     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Patel A.A., and Gould D.A. Simulators in interventional radiology training and evaluation: a paradigm shift is on the horizon. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 suppl (2006) S163-S173
2. Sherman V., Feldman L.S., Stanbridge D., Kazmi R., and Fried G.M. Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 19 (2005) 678-682
3. Lin P.H., Bush R.L., Peden E.K., et al. Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg 190 (2005) 850-857
4. Lobato A.C., Rodriguez-Lopez J., and Diethrich E.B. Learning curve for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: evaluation of a 277-patient single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 9 (2002) 262-268
5. Tassios P.S., Ladas S.D., Grammenos I., Demertzis K., and Raptis S.A. Acquisition of competence in colonoscopy: the learning curve of trainees. Endoscopy 31 (1999) 702-706
6. Berry M., Lystig T., Beard J., Klingenstierna H., Reznick R., and Lonn L. Porcine Transfer Study: virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 (2007) 441-455
7. Berry M., Lystig T., Reznick R., and Lonn L. Assessment of a virtual interventional simulator trainer. J Endovasc Ther 13 (2006) 237-243
8. Carter F.J., Schijven M.P., Aggarwal R., Grantcharov T., Francis N.K., Hanna G.B., and Jakimowicz J.J. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19 (2005) 1523-1532
9. Hsu J.H., Younan D., Pandalai S., et al. Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg 40 (2004) 1118-1125
10. Winder J., Zheng H., Hughes S., Kelly B., Wilson C., and Gallagher A. Increasing face validity of a vascular interventional training system. Stud Health Technol Inform 98 (2004) 410-415
11. Dayal R., Faries P.L., Lin S.C., et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg 40 (2004) 1112-1117
12. National Institutes of Health. Cost-benefit analysis guide for NIH IT projects (1999), Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD In: Services HaH, ed.
13. Representatives USSaUSHo. Patient and Physician Safety and Protection Act of 2005.In S.1297/H.R.1228. 2005.
14. AAMC AoAMC. AAMC Policy Guidance on Graduate Medical Education: Assuring Quality Patient Care and Quality Education. October 2001. Acad Med 78 (2003) 111-116
15. American Medical Association. H-310.979 Resident Physician Working Hours and Supervision (2005), AMA, Chicago
16. EU TCotEU. Working Time Directive. In, 1993.
17. Reznick R.K., and MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2664-2669
18. Gould D.A., Reekers J.A., Kessel D.O., et al. Simulation devices in interventional radiology: caveat emptor. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29 (2006) 4-6
19. Gallagher A.G., Ritter E.M., Champion H., et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 364-372
20. Lehmann K.S., Ritz J.P., Maass H., et al. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 442-449
21. Rotnes J.S., Kaasa J., Westgaard G., et al. A tutorial platform suitable for surgical simulator training (SimMentor). Stud Health Technol Inform 85 (2002) 419-425
22. Strom P., Kjellin A., Hedman L., Wredmark T., and Fellander-Tsai L. Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 115-120
23. Seymour N.E., Gallagher A.G., Roman S.A., et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236 (2002) 458-463
24. Grantcharov T.P., Kristiansen V.B., Bendix J., Bardram L., Rosenberg J., and Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 146-150
25. Youngblood P.L., Srivastava S., Curet M., Heinrichs W.L., Dev P., and Wren S.M. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. J Am Coll Surg 200 (2005) 546-551
26. Ost D., DeRosiers A., Britt E.J., Fein A.M., Lesser M.L., and Mehta A.C. Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164 (2001) 2248-2255