A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of experimental, non-filtered cigarettes manufactured with different circumferences

Inhalation Toxicology

Volumn 25, Issue S2, 2013, Pages 69-72

  Coggins, Christopher R E ^a   McKinney Jr , Willie J ^b   Oldham, Michael J ^b  

^a Carson Watts Consulting   (United States)

^b Altria Client Services Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Cigarette components; Cigarette design; Smoke chemistry; Toxicological testing

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE; CIGARETTE SMOKE CONDENSATE; HYDROGEN CYANIDE; NITROSAMINE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE CIRCUMFERENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; EMBRYO; MOUSE; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT PARAMETERS; SALMONELLA; SMOKING;

ANIMALS; BALB 3T3 CELLS; CELL SURVIVAL; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; FLAX; HYDROGEN CYANIDE; LETHAL DOSE 50; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; MUTAGENS; NITROSAMINES; PAPER; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PLANT LEAVES; SMOKE; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84890473987     PISSN: 08958378     EISSN: 10917691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2013.854436     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bundesgesetzblatt I. (1994). Grundsätzer der Guten Laborpraxis (GLP). Anhang 1 (zu x 19a Abs.1) der Neufassung des Chemikaliengesetzes vom 25 Juli 1994.
2. DeBardeleben M, Chaflin W, Gannon WF. (1978). Role of cigarette physical characteristics on smoke composition. Rec Adv Tob Sci 4: 85-111.
3. Dontenwill W, Chevalier HJ, Harke HP, et al. (1977). Experimental investigations on the tumorigenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin. VII. Comparative studies of condensates from different modified cigarettes. Cancer Res Clin Oncol 89:145-51. (Pubitemid 8115952)
4. Gaworski CL, Oldham MJ, Wagner KA, et al. (2011a). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of 95 ingredients added individually to experimental cigarettes: approach and methods. Inhal Toxicol 23:1-12.
5. Gaworski CL, Wagner KA, Morton MJ, Oldham MJ. (2011b). Insights from a multi-year program designed to test the impact of ingredients on mainstream cigarette smoke toxicity. Inhal Toxicol 23:172-83.
6. International Organization for Standardization. (1991). ISO 3308. Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine. Definitions and standard conditions. Amended 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
7. International Organization for Standardization. (1994). ISO 10362-2. Cigarettes - determination of water in smoke condensates - Part 2. Karl Fischer method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
8. International Organization for Standardization. (2000a). ISO 4387. Cigarettes - determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. Amended 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
9. International Organization for Standardization. (2000b). ISO 10315. Cigarettes - determination of nicotine in smoke condensates - gas chromatographic method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
10. Koller KB, Thomas CE, Parrish ME, Leyden DE. (1990). Puff-by-puff determination of gas phase acetaldehyde, HCN, NO and CO using FTIR spectrometry. CORESTA Information Bulletin (Symposium), Vol. 211. Paper presented at the CORESTA Symposium, Kallithea (Halkidiki), Greece, October 7-11.
11. Minister of Justice. (2000). Tobacco reporting regulations (TRR) SOR/ 2000-273, P.C. 2000.
12. Ottawa: Minister of Justice. Norman A. (1999). Cigarette design and materials. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. (eds.) Tobacco. Production, chemistry and technology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 353-87.
13. O'Connor RJ, Hammond D, McNeill A, et al. (2008). How do different cigarette design features influence the standard tar yields of popular cigarette brands sold in different countries? Tob Control 17:i1-5.
14. OECD. (1997). No. 471. Bacterial reverse mutation test. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Paris, France: OECD.
15. Putnam KP, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ. (2002). Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 16:599-607. (Pubitemid 35223143)
16. Resnik FE, Houck WG, Geiszler WA, Wickham JE. (1977). Factors affecting static burn rate. Tob Sci 21:265-7.
17. Roemer E, Tewes FJ, Meisgen TJ, et al. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 40:105-11. (Pubitemid 33132145)
18. Siu M, Mladjenovic N, Soo E. (2013). The analysis of mainstream smoke emissions of Canadian 'super slim' cigarettes. Tob Control 22:e10. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450.
19. Ungar K. (1992). The INVITTOX data bank of in-vitro techniques in toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 11:151-4.
20. Yamamoto M, Suga Y, Tokura C, et al. (1985). Effect of cigarette circumference on formation rates of various components in mainstream smoke. Beitr Tabakforsch Intl 13:81-7.
21. Yamamoto T, Anzai U, Okada T. (1984). Effect of cigarette circumference on weight loss during puffs and total delivery of tar and nicotine. Beitr Tabakforsch Intl 12:259-69. (Pubitemid 15128221)