Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia

Brain

Volumn 136, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3451-3460

  Fridriksson, Julius ^a   Guo, Dazhou ^a   Fillmore, Paul ^a   Holland, Audrey ^b   Rorden, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Arcuate fasciculus; Non fluent speech; Speech production; Uncinate fasciculus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARCUATE FASCICULUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; INSULA; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NON FLUENT APHASIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARS OPERCULARIS; PARS TRIANGULARIS; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SPEECH; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE; TEMPORAL LOBE; UNCINATE FASCICULUS; WHITE MATTER; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84890450443     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt267     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Acres K, Taylor KI, Moss HE, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. Complementary hemispheric asymmetries in object naming and recognition: a voxelbased correlational study. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 1836-43.
2. Albert M, Goodglass H, Helm NA, Rubens A, Alexander M. Clinical aspects of dysphasia. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
3. Andersen SM, Rapcsak SZ, Beeson PM. Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: still a necessity? Neuroimage 2010; 53: 78-84.
4. Barbey AK, Colom R, Paul EJ, Grafman J. Architecture of fluid intelligence and working memory revealed by lesion mapping. Brain Struct Funct 2013. Feb 8 [Epub ahead of print].
5. Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Dick F, Sereno MI, Knight RT, et al. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 448-50.
6. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Cox RW, Rao SM, Prieto T. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 353-62.
7. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 486-500.
8. Broca P. Remarques sur le sie'ge de la faculté du langage articulé : suivies d'une observation d'aphemie. Bull Soc Anat 1861; 6: 330-57.
9. Catani M, Dell'acqua F, Bizzi A, Forkel SJ, Williams SC, Simmons A, et al. Beyond cortical localization in clinico-Anatomical correlation. Cortex 2012; 48: 1262-87.
10. Catani M, Jones DK, ffytche DH. Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann Neurol 2005; 57: 8-16.
11. Celsis P, Boulanouar K, Doyon B, Ranjeva JP, Berry I, Nespoulous JL, et al. Differential fMRI Responses in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus to habituation and change detection in syllables and tones. NeuroImage 1999; 9: 135-44.
12. Code C. Did Leborgne have one or two speech automatisms? J Hist Neurosci 2013; 22: 319-20.
13. Dabul B. Apraxia battery for adults. 2nd edn. Austin: PRO-ED, Inc.; 2000.
14. Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 1996; 380: 499-505.
15. Démonet JF, Chollet F, Ramsay S, Cardebat D, Nespoulous JL, Wise R, et al. The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain 1992; 115: 1753-68.
16. Desikan RS, Sé gonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 968-80.
17. Desmond JE, Sum JM, Wagner AD, Demb JB, Shear PK, Glover GH, et al. Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-Tested patients. Brain 1995; 118: 1411-19.
18. Dick A, Tremblay P. Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. Brain 2012; 135: 3529-50.
19. Dugbartey AT, Sanchez PN, Rosenbaum JG, Mahurin RK, Davis JM, Townes BD. WAIS-III matrix reasoning test performance in a mixed clinical sample. Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 13: 396-404.
20. Fridriksson J, Hubbard HI, Hudspeth SG, Holland AL, Bonilha L, Fromm D, et al. Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech. Brain 2012; 135: 3815-29.
21. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical Parametric Maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1995; 2: 189-210.
22. Gläscher J, Tranel D, Paul LK, Rudrauf D, Rorden C, Hornaday A, et al. Lesion mapping of cognitive abilities linked to intelligence. Neuron 2009; 61: 681-91.
23. Goodglass H. Understanding aphasia. San Diego: Academic press; 1993.
24. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third edition (BDAE-3). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
25. Gordon JK. The fluency dimension in aphasia. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 673-88.
26. Guenther FH, Ghosh SS, Tourville JA. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang 2006; 96: 280-301.
27. Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8: 393-402.
28. Hickok G. Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012; 13: 135-45.
29. Hillis AE, Work M, Barker PB, Jacobs MA, Breese EL, Maurer K. Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 2004; 127: 1479-87.
30. Howard D, Patterson K, Wise R, Brown WD, Friston K, Weiller C, et al. The cortical localization of the lexicons: positron emission tomography evidence. Brain 1992; 115: 1769-82.
31. Kertesz A. The western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982.
32. Kertesz A, Harlock W, Coates R. Computer tomographic localization, lesion size, and prognosis in aphasia and nonverbal impairment. Brain Lang 1979; 8: 34-50.
33. Levine DN, Sweet E. The neuropathological basis of Broca's aphasia and its implications for the cerebral control of speech. In: Arbib M, Caplan D, Marshall JC, editors. Neural models of language processes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1982.
34. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. London: Tavistock publications; 1966.
35. Mazoyer BM, Tzourio N, Frak V, Syrota A, Murayama N, Levrier O, et al. The cortical representation of speech. J Cogn Neurosci 1993; 5: 467-79.
36. McNeil MR. The nature of aphasia in adults. In: Lass N, McReynolds L, Northern J, Yoder D, editors. Speech language and hearing. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1982. p. 692-740.
37. Mohr JP, Pessin MS, Finkelstein S, Funkenstein HH, Duncan GW, Davis KR. Broca aphasia: pathologic and clinical. Neurology 1978; 28: 311-24.
38. Naeser MA, Palumbo CL, Helm-Estabrooks N, Stiassny-Eder D, Albert ML. Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech. Brain 1989; 112: 1-38.
39. Nielsen JM. The unsolved problems in aphasia. II. Alexia resulting from a temporal lesion. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 1939; 4: 168-83.
40. Ochfeld E, Newhart M, Molitoris J, Leigh R, Cloutman L, Davis C, et al. Ischemia in Broca area is associated with Broca aphasia more reliably in acute than in chronic stroke. Stroke 2010; 41: 325-30.
41. Poeck K. Fluency. In: Code C, editor. The characteristics of aphasia. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis; 1989. p. 23-32.
42. Price CJ. The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. J Anat 2000; 197: 335-59.
43. Raven JC. Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press; 1976.
44. Richardson JD, Fillmore P, Rorden C, Lapointe LL, Fridriksson J. Reestablishing Broca's initial findings. Brain Lang 2012; 123: 125-30.
45. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000; 12: 191-200.
46. Rorden C, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J, Bender B, Karnath HO. Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization. Neuroimage 2012; 61: 957-65.
47. Rorden C, Fridriksson J, Karnath HO. An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 1355-62.
48. Schwartz MF. What the classical aphasia categories can't do for us, and why. Brain Lang 1984; 21: 3-8.
49. Thompson CK, Cho S, Hsu CJ, Wieneke C, Rademaker A, Weitner BB, et al. Dissociations between fluency and agrammatism in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 2012; 26: 20-43.
50. Tonkonogy J, Goodglass H. Language function, foot of the third frontal gyrus, and rolandic operculum. Arch Neurol 1981; 38: 486.
51. Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson WD, Randall B, Wright P, Devereux BJ, Zhuang J, et al. Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain 2011; 134: 415-31.
52. Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson W, Stamatakis EA. Dissociating neuro-cognitive component processes: voxel-based correlational methodology. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 771-8.
53. Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, Houdé O, et al. Meta-Analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 2006; 30: 1414-32.
54. Visser M, Jefferies E, Embleton KV, Lambon Ralph MA. Both the middle temporal gyrus and the ventral anterior temporal area are crucial for multimodal semantic processing: distortion-corrected fMRI evidence for a double gradient of information convergence in the temporal lobes. J Cogn Neurosci 2012; 24: 1766-78.
55. Wechsler D. Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale. Administration & Scoring Manual. 3rd edn. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
56. Wernicke C. The symptom-complex of aphasia. Diseases of the nervous system. New York: Appleton; 1908. p. 265-324.
57. Wise R, Chollet F, Hadar U, Friston K, Hoffner E, Frackowiak R. Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Brain 1991; 114: 1803-17.
58. Xu B, Grafman J, Gaillard WD, Ishii K, Vega-Bermudez F, Pietrini P, et al. Conjoint and extended neural networks for the computation of speech codes: the neural basis of selective impairment in reading words and pseudowords. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 267-77.