Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2092-2102

  Paxton, Alexandra ^a   Dale, Rick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Body movement; Conflict; Interaction; Interpersonal convergence; Synchrony

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONFLICT; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MOVEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890402357     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.853089     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. van Baaren, R., Janssen, L., Chartrand, T. L., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2009). Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2381-2389. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0057
2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
3. Bell, C., & Song, F. (2005). Emotions in the conflict process: An application of the cognitive appraisal model of emotions to conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(1), 30-54. doi: 10.1108/eb022922
4. Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 303-311. doi: 10.1177/0146167294203008
5. Boker, S. M., Rotondo, J. L., Xu, M., & King, K. (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychological Methods, 7(3), 338-355. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.3.338
6. Brennan, S. E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning (Vol. 53, pp. 301-344). Burlington: Academic Press.
7. Carrere, S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process, 38(3), 293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00293.x
8. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
9. Dale, R., Kirkham, N., & Richardson, D. (2011). The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 355.
10. Frantz, C. M., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2000). Considering both sides: The limits of perspective taking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(1), 31-42.
11. Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
12. Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1177/0093650209351468
13. Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949-960. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
14. Keith, T. Z. (2005). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.
15. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145-162. doi: 10.1023/A:1025389814290
16. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal interaction is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404-1426. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x
17. Miles, L. K., Griffiths, J. L., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Too late to coordinate: Contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 52-60.
18. Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329-343. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2
19. Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2008). Synchrony in dyadic psychotherapy sessions. In S. Vrobel, O. E. Roessler, & T. Marks-Tarlow (Eds.), Simultaneity: Temporal structures and observer perspectives (pp. 329-347). Singapore: World Scientific.
20. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Tomlinson, J. M. (2009). Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cognitive Science, 33(8), 1468-1482. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01057.x
21. Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G., Duong, D., & Woody, E. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns within interactions. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 97(6), 1005-1020. doi: 10.1037/a0016232
22. Schmidt, R. C., Morr, S., Fitzpatrick, P., & Richardson, M. J. (2012). Measuring the dynamics of interactional synchrony. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36(4), 263-279. doi: 10.1007/s10919-012-0138-5
23. Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 305-319. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x
24. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063