An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life

Nature

Volumn 504, Issue 7479, 2013, Pages 231-236

  Williams, Tom A ^a   Foster, Peter G ^b   Cox, Cymon J ^c   Embley, T Martin ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEAL RNA; RIBOSOME RNA;

BACTERIUM; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; MITOCHONDRION; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN; RELATEDNESS; RNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARCHAEAL GENE; ARCHAEON; BACTERIUM; CELL MEMBRANE; DNA SEQUENCE; ENDOSYMBIONT; EUKARYOTE; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE LOSS; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC MODEL; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; HOST CELL; HYPOTHESIS; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; MITOCHONDRION; MONOPHYLY; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHOSPHOLIPID MEMBRANE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTIST; REVIEW;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; CELL MEMBRANE; EUKARYOTA; MITOCHONDRIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84890355580     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12779     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Woese, C. R. & Fox, G. E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5088-5090 (1977)
2. Embley, T. M. & Martin, W. Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges. Nature 440, 623-630 (2006)
3. Woese, C. R. On the evolution of cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8742-8747 (2002)
4. Woese, C. R. & Fox, G. E. The concept of cellular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 10, 1-6 (1977)
5. Doolittle, W. F. &Brown, J. R. Tempo,mode, the progenote, and the universal root. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6721-6728 (1994)
6. Iwabe, N., Kuma, K., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S. & Miyata, T. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9355-9359 (1989)
7. Gogarten, J. P. et al. Evolution of the vacuolar H1-ATPase: implications for the origin of eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6661-6665 (1989)
8. Dagan, T., Roettger, M., Bryant, D. & Martin, W. Genome networks root the tree of life between prokaryotic domains. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 379-392 (2010)
9. Lake, J. A., Skophammer, R. G., Herbold, C. W. & Servin, J. A. Genome beginnings: rooting the tree of life. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2177-2185 (2009)
10. Skophammer, R. G., Servin, J. A., Herbold, C. W. & Lake, J. A. Evidence for a grampositive, eubacterial root of the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1761-1768 (2007)
11. Cavalier-Smith, T. Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses. Biol. Direct 1, 19 (2006)
12. Cox, C. J., Foster, P. G., Hirt, R. P., Harris, S. R. & Embley, T. M. The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20356-20361 (2008)
13. Doolittle, W. F. & Zhaxybayeva, O. in The Prokaryotes: Prokaryotic Biology and Symbiotic Associations (ed. Rosenberg, E. ) (Springer, 2013
14. Woese, C. R., Kandler, O. &Wheelis, M. L. Towards a natural systemof organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4576-4579 (1990)
15. Madigan, M. T., Martingo, J. M., Stahl, D. A. & Clark, D. P. Brock Biology of Microorganisms 13th edn (Benjamin Cummings, 2010
16. Pace, N. R. Time for a change. Nature 441, 289 (2006)
17. Pace, N. R. Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 565-576 (2009)
18. Lake, J. A., Henderson, E., Oakes, M. & Clark, M. W. Eocytes: a new ribosome structure indicates a kingdom with a close relationship to eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3786-3790 (1984)
19. Gribaldo, S., Poole, A. M.,Daubin, V., Forterre, P. &Brochier- Armanet, C. The origin of eukaryotes and their relationship with the Archaea: are we at a phylogenomic impasse? Nature Rev. Microbiol. 8, 743-752 (2010)
20. Knoll, A. H., Javaux, E. J., Hewitt, D. & Cohen, P. Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 1023-1038 (2006)
21. Philippe, H. & Forterre, P. The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 509-523 (1999)
22. Foster, P. G., Cox, C. J. & Embley, T. M. The primary divisions of life: a phylogenomic approach employing composition-heterogeneous methods. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 2197-2207 (2009
23. Penny, D., McComish, B. J., Charleston, M. A. & Hendy, M. D. Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 711-723 (2001)
24. Ho, S. Y. & Jermiin, L. Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst. Biol. 53, 623-637 (2004)
25. Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. 7 (suppl. 1), S4 (2007)
26. Philippe, H. et al. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000602 (2011)
27. Gouy, M. & Li, W. H. Phylogenetic analysis based on rRNA sequences supports the archaebacterial rather than the eocyte tree. Nature 339, 145-147 (1989)
28. Woese, C. R. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 221-271 (1987)
29. Olsen, G. J. Earliest phylogenetic branchings: comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 52, 825-837 (1987)
30. Foster, P. G. & Hickey, D. A. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 284-290 (1999)
31. Foster, P. G. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53, 485-495 (2004)
32. Hirt, R. P. et al. Microsporidia are related to Fungi: evidence from the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and other proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 580-585 (1999)
33. Lake, J. A. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1455-1459 (1994)
34. Yang, Z. & Roberts, D. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 451-458 (1995)
35. Felsenstein, J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410 (1978)
36. Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 303-314 (2012)
37. Lake, J. A. Origin of the eukaryotic nucleus determined by rate-invariant analysis of rRNA sequences. Nature 331, 184-186 (1988)
38. Sidow, A. & Wilson, A. C. Compositional statistics: an improvement of evolutionary parsimony and its application to deep branches in the tree of life. J. Mol. Evol. 31, 51-68 (1990)
39. Tourasse, N. J. & Gouy, M. Accounting for evolutionary rate variation among sequence sites consistently changes universal phylogenies deduced from rRNA and protein-coding genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 159-168 (1999)
40. Yutin, N., Makarova, K. S., Mekhedov, S. L., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. The deep archaeal roots of eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1619-1630 (2008)
41. Harris, J. K., Kelley, S. T., Spiegelman, G. B. & Pace, N. R. The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res. 13, 407-412 (2003)
42. Katoh, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 477-484 (2001)
43. Ciccarelli, F. D. et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283-1287 (2006)
44. Lake, J. A. The order of sequence alignment can bias the selection of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 378-385 (1991)
45. Brown, J. R., Douady, C. J., Italia, M. J., Marshall, W. E. & Stanhope, M. J. Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets. Nature Genet. 28, 281-285 (2001)
46. Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095-1109 (2004)
47. Guy, L. & Ettema, T. J. The archaeal 'TACK' superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol. 19, 580-587 (2011)
48. Williams, T. A., Foster, P. G., Nye, T. M., Cox, C. J. & Embley, T. M. A congruent phylogenomic signal places eukaryotes within the Archaea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 4870-4879 (2012)
49. Lasek-Nesselquist, E. &Gogarten, J. P. Theeffects ofmodel choice and mitigating bias on the ribosomal tree of life. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 17-38 (2013)
50. Pester, M., Schleper, C. & Wagner, M. The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 300-306 (2011)
51. Lloyd, K. G. et al. Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins. Nature 496, 215-218 (2013)
52. Graybeal, A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9-17 (1998)
53. Elkins, J. G. et al. A korarchaeal genome reveals insights into the evolution of the Archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8102-8107 (2008)
54. Brochier-Armanet, C., Boussau, B., Gribaldo, S. & Forterre, P. Mesophilic Crenarchaeota: proposal for a third archaeal phylum, the Thaumarchaeota. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 6, 245-252 (2008)
55. Nunoura, T. et al. Insights into the evolution of Archaea and eukaryotic protein modifier systems revealed by the genome of a novel archaeal group. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 3204-3223 (2011)
56. Kelly, S., Wickstead, B. & Gull, K. Archaeal phylogenomics provides evidence in support of a methanogenic origin of the Archaea and a thaumarchaeal origin for the eukaryotes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278, 1009-1018 (2011)
57. Ettema, T. J., Lindas, A. C. & Bernander, R. An actin-based cytoskeleton in archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 1052-1061 (2011)
58. Yutin, N. & Koonin, E. V. Archaeal origin of tubulin. Biol. Direct 7, 10 (2012)
59. Koonin, E. V.,Makarova, K. S. &Elkins, J. G. Orthologs of thesmallRPB8subunit of the eukaryotic RNA polymerases are conserved in hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeota and ''Korarchaeota''. Biol. Direct 2, 38 (2007)
60. Csurö s, M. & Miklos, I. Streamlining and large ancestral genomes in Archaea inferred with a phylogenetic birth-and-death model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 2087-2095 (2009)
61. Wolf, Y. I., Makarova, K. S., Yutin, N. & Koonin, E. V. Updated clusters of orthologous genes for Archaea: a complex ancestor of the Archaea and the byways of horizontal gene transfer. Biol. Direct 7, 46 (2012)
62. Ribeiro, S. & Golding, G. B. Themosaic nature of the eukaryotic nucleus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 779-788 (1998)
63. Rivera, M. C., Jain, R., Moore, J. E. & Lake, J. A. Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6239-6244 (1998)
64. Esser, C. et al. A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among a-proteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1643-1660 (2004)
65. Alsmark, C. et al. Patterns of prokaryotic lateral gene transfers affecting parasitic microbial eukaryotes. Genome Biol. 14, R19 (2013)
66. Cotton, J. A. & McInerney, J. O. Eukaryotic genes of archaebacterial origin are more important than the more numerous eubacterial genes, irrespective of function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17252-17255 (2010)
67. Dagan, T. & Martin, W. The tree of one percent. Genome Biol. 7, 118 (2006)
68. Doolittle, W. F. & Bapteste, E. Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2043-2049 (2007)
69. Williams, D. et al. A rooted net of life. Biol. Direct 6, 45 (2011)
70. Creevey, C. J., Doerks, T., Fitzpatrick, D. A., Raes, J. & Bork, P. Universally distributed single-copy genes indicate a constant rate of horizontal transfer. PLoS ONE 6, e22099 (2011)
71. Boussau, B. et al. Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees. Genome Res. 23, 323-330 (2013)
72. Szollösi, G. J., Boussau, B., Abby, S. S., Tannier, E. & Daubin, V. Phylogenetic modeling of lateral gene transfer reconstructs the pattern and relative timing of speciations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17513-17518 (2012)
73. Cohen, O., Gophna, U. & Pupko, T. The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather thanfunctionconstitutes a barrier tohorizontal gene transfer. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1481-1489 (2011)
74. Jain, R., Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3801-3806 (1999)
75. Butterfield, N. J. Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp. : implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/ Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes. Paleobiology 26, 386-404 (2000)
76. Parfrey, L. W., Lahr, D. J., Knoll, A. H. & Katz, L. A. Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13624-13629 (2011)
77. Brocks, J. J., Logan, G. A., Buick, R. & Summons, R. E. Archean molecular fossils and the early rise of eukaryotes. Science 285, 1033-1036 (1999)
78. Rasmussen, B., Fletcher, I. R., Brocks, J. J. & Kilburn, M. R. Reassessing the first appearance of eukaryotes and cyanobacteria. Nature 455, 1101-1104 (2008)
79. Fischer, W. W. Biogeochemistry: life before the rise of oxygen. Nature 455, 1051-1052 (2008
80. Ueno, Y., Yamada, K., Yoshida, N., Maruyama, S. & Isozaki, Y. Evidence fromfluid inclusions for microbial methanogenesis in the early Archaean era. Nature 440, 516-519 (2006)
81. Papineau, D.,Walker, J. J.,Mojzsis, S. J. &Pace, N. R. Compositionandstructure of microbial communities from stromatolites of Hamelin Pool in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4822-4832 (2005)
82. Allwood, A. C. et al. Controls on development and diversity of Early Archean stromatolites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9548-9555 (2009)
83. Tice, M. M. & Lowe, D. R. Photosynthetic microbial mats in the 3,416-Myr-old ocean. Nature 431, 549-552 (2004)
84. Schopf, J. W. Fossil evidence of Archaean life. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 869-885 (2006)
85. Cavalier-Smith, T. Eukaryotes with no mitochondria. Nature 326, 332-333 (1987)
86. Cavalier-Smith, T. in Endocytobiology II (eds Schwemmler, W. & Schenk, H. E. A. ) 1027-1034 (De Gruyter, 1983
87. van der Giezen, M., Tovar, J. & Clark, C. G. Mitochondria-derived organelles in protists and fungi. Int. Rev. Cytol. 244, 175-225 (2005)
88. Andersson, S. G. et al. The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396, 133-140 (1998)
89. Horner, D. S., Hirt, R. P., Kilvington, S., Lloyd, D. & Embley, T. M. Molecular data suggest an early acquisition of the mitochondrion endosymbiont. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1053-1059 (1996)
90. Lane, N. & Martin, W. The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467, 929-934 (2010)
91. Martin, W. & Koonin, E. V. Introns and the origin of nucleus-cytosol compartmentalization. Nature 440, 41-45 (2006)
92. Lombard, J., Lopez-Garcia, P. & Moreira, D. The early evolution of lipid membranes and the three domains of life. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 10, 507-515 (2012)
93. Pitcher, A. et al. Core and intact polar glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether lipids of ammonia-oxidizing archaea enriched from marine and estuarine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3468-3477 (2011)
94. van de Vossenberg, J. L., Driessen, A. J. & Konings, W. N. The essence of being extremophilic: the role of the unique archaealmembrane lipids. Extremophiles 2, 163-170 (1998)
95. Boucher, Y., Kamekura, M. & Doolittle, W. F. Origins and evolution of isoprenoid lipid biosynthesis in archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 515-527 (2004)
96. Lombard, J., Lopez-Garcia, P. & Moreira, D. An ACP-independent fatty acid synthesis pathway in archaea: implications for the origin of phospholipids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 3261-3265 (2012)
97. Guldan, H., Matysik, F. M., Bocola, M., Sterner, R. & Babinger, P. Functional assignment of an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of an archaea-type ether lipid in bacteria. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 50, 8188-8191 (2011)
98. Tan, H. H., Makino, A., Sudesh, K., Greimel, P. & Kobayashi, T. Spectroscopic evidence for the unusual stereochemical configuration of an endosome-specific lipid. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 51, 533-535 (2012)
99. Shimada, H. & Yamagishi, A. Stability of heterochiral hybridmembrane made of bacterial sn-G3P lipids and archaeal sn-G1P lipids. Biochemistry 50, 4114-4120 (2011)
100. Martin, W. & Muller, M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 392, 37-41 (1998)
101. Nelson-Sathi, S. et al. Acquisition of 1,000 eubacterial genes physiologically transformedamethanogen at the origin of Haloarchaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20537-20542 (2012)
102. Hampl, V. et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic ''supergroups''. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3859-3864 (2009)
103. Song, S., Liu, L., Edwards, S. V. & Wu, S. Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14942-14947 (2012)
104. Linda?s, A. C., Karlsson, E. A., Lindgren, M. T., Ettema, T. J. &Bernander, R. A unique cell division machinery in the Archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18942-18946 (2008)
105. Makarova, K. S., Yutin, N.,Bell, S. D. &Koonin, E. V. Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 8, 731-741 (2010)
106. Blombach, F. et al. Identification of an ortholog of the eukaryoticRNA polymerase III subunit RPC34 in Crenarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota suggests specialization of RNA polymerases for coding and non-coding RNAs in Archaea. Biol. Direct 4, 39 (2009)
107. Daniels, J. P., Kelly, S., Wickstead, B. & Gull, K. Identification of a crenarchaeal orthologue of Elf1: implications for chromatin and transcription in Archaea. Biol. Direct 4, 24 (2009)
108. Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte prokaryotes are immediate relatives. Science 257, 74-76 (1992)