Self-deceptive speech: A psycholinguistic view

Personality and Psychopathology: Critical Dialogues with David Shapiro

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 183-200

  Schober, Michael F ^a   Glick, Peter J ^a  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890176697     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6214-0_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & McKay, D. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
2. Barrett, L. F., Williams, N. L., & Fong, G. T. (2002). Defensive verbal behavior assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 776-788.
3. Berry, D. S., Pennebaker, J. W., Mueller, J. S., & Hiller, W. S. (1997). Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 526-537.
4. Brennan, S.E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 53 (pp. 301-344). Burlington: Academic Press.
5. Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 274-291.
6. Brennan, S. E., & Ohaeri, J. O. (1999). Why do electronic conversations seem less polite? The costs and benefits of hedging. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities, Coordination, and Collaboration (WACC '99) (pp. 227-235). San Francisco: ACM.
7. Burgoon, J. K., Blair, J. P., Qin, T., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Detecting deception through linguistic analysis. Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2665, 91-101.
8. Christensen, T. C. (2003). Experiencing sampling procedures: Are they probes to autonetic awareness? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, Boston.
9. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
10. Epstein, J. F., Barker, P. R., & Kroutil, L. A. (2001). Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 529-549.
11. Glick, P. J., & Schober, M. F. (2007). Lexical content of defensive speech. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Glasgow.
12. Glick, P. J., & Schober, M. F. (2011). Lexical characteristics of defensive speech. Manuscript in preparation.
13. Hancock, J. T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
14. Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1990). Ostensible invitations. Language in Society, 19, 493-509.
15. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 46-50.
16. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 655-701). New York: Guilford.
17. Lackner, J. R., & Tuller, B. H. (1979). Role of efference monitoring in the detection of self-produced speech errors. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Motley, M. T. (1980). Verification of "Freudian slips" and semantic prearticulatory editing via laboratory-induced spoonerisms. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.
20. Motley, M. T., Baars, B. J., & Camden, C. T. (1981). Syntactic criteria in prearticulatory editing: Evidence from laboratory-induced slips of the tongue. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 503-522.
21. Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T., & Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578-594.
22. Moum, T. (1998). Mode of administration and interviewer effects in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Social Indicators Research, 45, 279-318.
23. Nelson, K. L., & Horowitz, L. M. (2001). Narrative structure in recounted sad memories. Discourse Processes, 31, 307-324.
24. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
25. Nozari, N., & Dell, G. S. (2009). More on lexical bias: How efficient can a "lexical editor" be? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 291-307.
26. Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528-537.
27. Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Self-deception: Where do we stand? In J. S. Lockard & D. L. Paulhus (Eds.), Self-deception: An adaptive mechanism? (pp. 251-257). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
28. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2001. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
29. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-190.
30. Rosen, R. L., Schober, M. F., & Conrad, F. G. (2009). Mode effects in questions about stigmatized behaviors and personal distress. Paper presented at the 64th annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Hollywood.
31. Sackeim, H. A. (1988). Self-deception: A synthesis. In J. S. Lockard & D. L. Paulhus (Eds.), Selfdeception: An adaptive mechanism? (pp. 146-165). New York: Prentice-Hall.
32. Sackeim, H. A., & Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2, pp. 139-197). New York: Plenum.
33. Schober, M. F. (2006). Dialogue and interaction. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 564-571). Oxford: Elsevier.
34. Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Shapiro, D. (1989). Psychotherapy of neurotic character. New York: Basic Books.
36. Shapiro, D. (1996). On the psychology of self-deception. Social Research, 63, 785-800.
37. Shapiro, D. (1996). On the psychology of self-deception. Social Research, 63(3), 785-800.
38. Suessbrick, A., Schober, M. F., & Conrad, F. G. (2005). When do respondent misconceptions lead to survey response error? In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria: American Statistical Association.
39. Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 274-304.
40. Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859-883.
41. Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego mechanisms of defense. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
42. DiNardo, A. C., Schober, M. F., & Stuart, J. (2005). Chair and couch discourse: A study of visual copresence in psychoanalysis. Discourse Processes, 40, 209-238.
43. Russell, A. W., & Schober, M. F. (1999). How beliefs about a partner's goals affect referring in goal-discrepant conversations. Discourse Processes, 27(1), 1-33.