Rigid-body motions of interacting proteins dominate multispecific binding of ubiquitin in a shape-dependent manner

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 77-89

  Dasgupta, Bhaskar ^a   Nakamura, Haruki ^a   Kinjo, Akira R ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Date hub protein; Ligand multispecificity; Ligand shape; Ligand coupled motion; Normal mode analysis; Rigid body motion; Ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS COUPLING REACTION; DECOMPOSITION; ELASTICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MOLECULE; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; RIGIDITY; ROTATION; VIBRATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

DATE HUB PROTEIN; LIGAND MULTISPECIFICITY; LIGAND SHAPE; LIGAND-COUPLED MOTION; NORMAL MODE ANALYSIS; RIGID-BODY MOTION; UBIQUITIN;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIMERIZATION; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 84890129824     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24371     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Deeds E, Ashenberg O, Gerardine J, Shakhnovich E. Robust protein-protein interactions in crowded cellular environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(38):14952-14957.
2. Han J-DJ, Bertin N, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Berriz GF, Zhang L V, Dupuy D, Walhout AJM, Cusick ME, Roth FP, Vidal M. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004;430(6995):88-93.
3. Dasgupta B, Nakamura H, Kinjo AR. Distinct roles of overlapping and non-overlapping regions of hub protein interfaces in recognition of multiple partners. J Mol Biol 2011;411(3):713-727.
4. Bai H, Ma W, Liu S, Lai L. Dynamic property is a key determinant for protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2008;70(4):1323-1331.
5. Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 2007;450(7172):964-972.
6. Miller DW, Agard DA. Enzyme specificity under dynamic control: a normal mode analysis of alpha-lytic protease. J Mol Biol 1999;286(1):267-278.
7. Wells JA, McClendon CL. Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein-protein interfaces. Nature 2007;450(7172):1001-1009.
8. Kim PM, Lu LJ, Xia Y, Gerstein MB. Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 2006;314(5807):1938-1941.
9. Kim PM, Sboner A, Xia Y, Gerstein M. The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4(179):179.
10. Dasgupta B, Nakamura H, Kinjo AR. Counterbalance of ligand- and self-coupled motions characterizes multispecificity of ubiquitin. Protein Sci 2013;22(2):168-178.
11. Ishida H, Jochi Y, Kidera A. Dynamic structure of subtilisin-eglin C complex studied by normal mode analysis. Proteins 1998;32(3):324-333.
12. Tirion M. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77(9):1905-1908.
13. Marcos E, Crehuet R, Bahar I. Changes in dynamics upon oligomerization regulate substrate binding and allostery in amino acid kinase family members. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7(9):e1002201.
14. Standley DM, Kinjo AR, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research. Briefings Bioinf 2008;9(4):276-285.
15. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247(4):536-540.
16. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer ELL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;40:290-301.
17. Schlieker C, Weihofen WA, Frijns E, Kattenhorn LM, Gaudet R, Ploegh HL. Structure of a herpesvirus-encoded cysteine protease reveals a unique class of deubiquitinating enzymes. Mol Cell 2007;25(5):677-687.
18. Kinjo AR, Kumagai Y, Dinh H, Takeuchi O, Standley DM. Functional characterization of protein domains common to animal viruses and mouse. BMC Genomics 2011;12(suppl 3):S21.
19. Westbrook J, Ito N, Nakamura H, Henrick K, Berman HM. PDBML: the representation of archival macromolecular structure data in XML. Bioinformatics 2005;21(7):988-992.
20. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25(17):3389-3402.
21. Diamond R. A note on the rotational superposition problem. Acta Cryst 1988;44(2):211-216.
22. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. "NACCESS", computer program. London, UK: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London; 1993.
23. Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Blackford S, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Du Croz J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A, Sorensen D. LAPACK users' guide. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1999.
24. Wilson EB, Decius JC, Cross PC. Molecular vibrations: the theory of infrared and raman vibrational spectra. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1955. p 394.
25. Field MJ. A practical introduction to the simulation of molecular systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
26. Miller WH, Handy NC, Adams JE. Reaction path Hamiltonian for polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 1980;72(1):99.
27. Rawat N, Biswas P. Size, shape, and flexibility of proteins and DNA. J Chem Phys 2009;131(16):165104.
28. Sloper-Mould KE, Jemc JC, Pickart CM, Hicke L. Distinct functional surface regions on ubiquitin. J Biol Chem 2001;276(32):30483-30489.
29. Joughin BA, Green DF, Tidor B. Action-at-a-distance interactions enhance protein binding affinity. Protein Sci 2005;14(5):1363-1369.
30. Friedler A, Veprintsev DB, Rutherford T, Glos KI Von, Fersht AR. Binding of Rad51 and other peptide sequences to a promiscuous, highly electrostatic binding site in p53. J Biol Chem 2005;280(9):8051-8059.
31. Ubbink M. The courtship of proteins: understanding the encounter complex. FEBS Lett 2009;583(7):1060-1066.
32. Patil A, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks. Int J Mol Sci 2010;11(4):1930-1943.
33. Holstein MA, Chung WK, Parimal S, Freed AS, Barquera B, McCallum SA, Cramer SM. Probing multimodal ligand binding regions on ubiquitin using nuclear magnetic resonance, chromatography, and molecular dynamics simulations. J Chromatogr A 2012;1229:113-120.
34. Henzler-Wildman KA, Lei M, Thai V, Kerns SJ, Karplus M, Kern D. A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 2007;450(7171):913-916.
35. McDonald LR, Whitley MJ, Boyer JA, Lee AL. Colocalization of fast and slow timescale dynamics in the allosteric signaling protein CheY. J Mol Biol 2013;425(13):2372-2381.
36. Janin J, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P. Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure. Q Rev Biophys 2008;41(2):133-180.
37. Fromer M, Shifman JM. Tradeoff between stability and multispecificity in the design of promiscuous proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5(12):16.
38. Kundrotas PJ, Zhu Z, Janin J, Vakser IA. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(24):1-4.
39. Lange OF, Lakomek N-A, Farès C, Schröder GF, Walter KFA, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmüller H, Griesinger C, Groot BL De. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 2008;320(5882):1471-1475.
40. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. eF-site and PDBjViewer: database and viewer for protein functional sites. Bioinformatics 2004;20(8):1329-1330.