The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: A case study of two Indonesian PES schemes

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 6, Issue , 2013, Pages 54-63

  Fauzi, Akhmad ^a   Anna, Zuzy ^b  

^a BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b PADJADJARAN UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Fiscal mechanism; Institutional attributes; Payment for environmental services; Property rights; Transaction costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890124799     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen D. What are transaction costs?. Research in Law and Economics 1991, 14:1-18.
2. Allen D. The rhino's horn: Incomplete property rights and the optimal value of an asset. Journal of Legal Studies 2002, 30:339-358.
3. Alpizar, F., Madrigal, R., 2008. Constructing payment systems for ecological services at the local level. In: Conference Paper on Methodological Approach and Some Lessons Learned. Economics and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue.
4. Alston, L.J., Anderson, K., Smith, S.M., 2013. Payment for Environmental Services: Hypotheses and Evidence. NBER Working Paper Series 18740. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
5. Antle J.M., Stoorvogel J.J. Payment for environmental services, poverty and sustainability: the case of agricultural soil carbon sequestration. Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes: Economic Policies and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries 2009, 133-161. FAO-Springer, Rome. L. Lipper, T. Sakuyama, R. Stinger, D. Zilberman (Eds.).
6. Arifin, B., 2005. Institutional Constraints and Opportunities in Developing Environmental Service Market: Lessons from Institutional Studies on RUPES in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)-SEA Office, Bogor, Indonesia.
7. Budhi G.S., Kuswanto S.A., Iqbal M. Concept and implementation of PES program in the Cidanau watershed: a lesson learned for future environmental policy. Journal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian (Journal of Agricultural Policy) 2008, 6(1):37-55.
8. Coase R. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 1960, 3:1-44.
9. Corbera E., Soberanis C.G., Brown K. Institutional dimensions of payment for environmental services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:743-761.
10. Demsetz H. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 1967, 57(2):347-359.
11. Dietz T., Orstom E., Stern P.C. The struggle to govern the common. Science 2003, 302(5652):1907-1912.
12. Farley J., Constanza R. Payment for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:2060-2068.
13. Payment for Environmental Services: Legal and Institutional Frameworks 2009, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. T. Greiber (Ed.).
14. Indonesian Central Statistic Agency, 2012. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, BPS Publishing, Jakarta, Indonesia.
15. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2011. Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam: An Analysis of the Pilot Project in Lam Dong Province. Forest Conservation Project Occasional Paper No. 5. IGES, Japan.
16. International Crisis Group (ICG), 2001. Indonesia: Natural Resources and Law Enforcement. Asia Report Number 29. Jakarta, Brussels.
17. Jindal, R., Kerr, J., 2007. Transaction Costs. USAID PES Brief 3.4.
18. Kaplowitz M.D., Ortega-Pacheco D.V., Lupi F. Payment for environmental services and other institutions for protecting drinking water in eastern Costa Rica. Alternative Institutional Structures: Evolution and Impact 2008, 380-401. Routledge Press, London. S.S. Batie, N. Mercuro (Eds.).
19. Khatri, D.B., 2009. Compromising the Environment in Payments for Environmental Services? An Institutional Analysis of Mechanisms for Sharing Hydroelectricity Revenue in the Kulekhani Watershed, Nepal. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Development Studies, The Hague, Netherlands.
20. Klein P.G. New institutional economics. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 2000, 456-489. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. B. Bouckeart, G. De Geest (Eds.).
21. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payment for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1228-1236.
22. Leffler K.B., Rucker R.R. Transaction costs and the efficient organization of production: a study of timber-harvesting contracts. Journal of Political Economy 1991, 99(51):1060-1087.
23. Leitmann J., et al. Investing in a More Sustainable Indonesia: Country Environmental Analysis. CEA Series, East Asia and Pacific Region 2009, World Bank, Washington, DC.
24. Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes: Economic Policies and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries 2009, FAO Springer, Rome. L. Lipper, T. Sakuyama, R. Stinger, D. Zilberman (Eds.).
25. May P.H., Neto F.V., Denardin V., Lourero W. Using fiscal instruments to encourage conservation: municipal responses to the "ecological" value-added tax in Parana and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development 2004, 173-199. Earthscan Publication Ltd., United Kingdom. S. Pagiola, J. Bishop, N. Landell-Mills (Eds.).
26. Mayrand K., Paquin M. Payment for Environmental Services: A Survey and Assessment of Current Scheme 2004, Unisfera International Centre, Montreal, Canada.
27. New Institutional Economics 2005, Springer, The Netherlands. C. Menard, M.M. Shirley (Eds.).
28. Paavola, J., Adger, W.N., 2006. New Institutional Economics and the Environment: Conceptual Foundations and Policy Implications. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 02-06.
29. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development 2004, Earthscan Publication Ltd, United Kingdom. S. Pagiola, J. Bishop, N. Landell-Mills (Eds.).
30. Pender, J., Suyanto, S., Kerr, J., Kato, E., 2008. Impacts of the hutan kemasyarakatan Social Forestry Program in the Sumberjaya Watershed, West Lampung District of Sumatra, Indonesia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00769. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
31. Pirard R. Payment for Environmental Services (PES) in the public policy landscape:"mandatory" spices in the Indonesia recipe. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 18:23-29.
32. Prasetyo F.A., Suwarno A., Purwanto, Hakim R. Making policy work for payment for environmental services (PES): an evaluation of the experience of formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2009, 28:415-433.
33. Ruhweza, A., Masiga, M., 2007. Institutions for payments for environmental services; challenges and opportunities in Uganda. Prepared for the Ninth Annual BIOECON Conference on "Economics and Institutions for Biodiversity Conservation." Kings College, Cambridge, pp. 19-21.
34. Suyanto, S., Leimona, B., Permana, R.P., Chandler, F.J.C., 2005. Review of the Development of Environmental Services Market in Indonesia. World AgroForestry Centre (ICRAF) South East Asia Office, Bogor, Indonesia.
35. Umbeck J. The California gold rush: a study of emerging property rights. Explorations in Economic History 1977, 14:197-226.
36. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2207-2215.
37. Vatn A. An instituional analysis of payment for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1245-1252.
38. Wendland K., Naughton L., Sudrez L., Suyanto S. Rewards for environmental services and collective land tenure: lessons from Ecuador and Indonesia. Mountain Forum Bulletin 2010, 19-22.
39. Williamson O.E. The Mechanism of Governance 1996, Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
41. Wunder, S., 2008. Necessary Condition for Ecosystem Service Payment. Conference Paper, Economic and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue.
42. Yeager, C., 2008. Conservation of Tropical Forests and Biological Diversity in Indonesia. Report Submitted to USAID, Indonesia.