Dialogue in joint activity: Complementarity, convergence and conventionalization

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 158-173

  Mills, Gregory J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

(Mis)communication; Alignment; Coordination; Dialogue; Grounding; Sequentiality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890114617     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson A.H., Bader M., Bard E.G., Boyle E., Doherty G., Garrod S., et al. The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech 1991, 34(4):351-366.
2. Austin J.L. How to do things with words 1962, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. In M. Holquist (Eds.) (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
4. Bangerter A., Clark H.H. Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science 2003, 27:195-225.
5. Brennan S.E., Clark H.H. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1482-1493.
6. Brennan S.E., Galati A., Kuhlen A. Two Minds, one dialog: coordinating speaking and understanding. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2010, 53:301-344.
7. Brown-Schmidt S., Tanenhaus M.K. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science 2008, 32:643-684.
8. Clark H.H., Schaefer E. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 1989, 13:259-294.
9. Clark H.H. Using language 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Clark H.H., Krych M.A. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50(1):62-81.
11. Conchiglia G., Rocca G.D., Grossi D. On a peculiar environmental dependency syndrome in a case with frontal-temporal damage: Zelig-like syndrome. Neurocase, iFirst 2007, 1-5.
12. Enfield N.J., Sidnell J. Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. The social origins of language: Studies in the evolution of language 2013, Oxford University Press, Oxford. D. Dor, C. Knight, J. Lewis (Eds.).
13. Ferreira V., Bock K. The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21(7-8):1011-1029.
14. Fusaroli R., Raczaszec-Leonardi J., Tylén K. Dialogue as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology 2014, 32:147-157.
15. Fusaroli R., Bahrami B., Olsen K., Frith C.D., Roepstorff A., Tylén K. Coming to terms: an experimental quantification of the coordinative benefits of linguistic interaction. Psychological science 2012, 23(8):931-939.
16. Galantucci B. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2005, 29(5):737-767.
17. Gann, T. M., & Barr, D. J. Speaking from experience: audience design as expert performance. Language and Cognitive Processes, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.641388.
18. Garrod S. The challenge of dialogue for theories of language processing. Language processing 1999, Psychology Press, Hove. S. Garrod, M. Pickering (Eds.).
19. Garrod S., Anderson A. Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition 1987, 27(2):181-218.
20. Garrod D., Anderson A., Sanford A. Semantic negotiation and the dynamics of conversational meaning 1984, Technical Report 1, Glasgow Psychology Technical Report.
21. Garrod S., Doherty G. Conversation, coordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition 1994, 53(3):181-215.
22. Garrod S., Fay N., Lee J., Oberlander J., MacLeod T. Foundations of representation: where might graphical symbol systems come from?. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2007, 31(6):961-987.
23. Ginzburg J. The interactive stanc 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Gregoromichelaki E., Cann R., Kempson R. Coordination in dialogue: subsentential speech and its implications 2013, Brevity Oxford University Press. L. Goldstein (Ed.).
25. Gregoromichelaki E., Kempson R., Cann R. Language as tools for interaction: grammar and the dynamics of ellipsis resolution. The Linguistic Review 2012, 29(4):563-584.
26. Healey P.G.T. Expertise or expert-ese? The emergence of task-oriented sub-languages. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the cognitive science society 1997, Stanford, California.
27. Healey P., Purver M., King J., Ginzburg J., Mills G. Experimenting with clarification in dialogue. Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2003, 539-544.
28. Healey P.G.T. "Dialogue in the degenerate case?" Peer commentary on Pickering and Garrod: 'the interactive alignment model'. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27(2):201.
29. Healey P.G.T., Mills G.J. Participation, precedence and co-ordination in dialogue. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2006, Vancouver, Canada.
30. Healey P.G.T., Swoboda N., Umata I., King J. Graphical language games: interactional constraints on representational form. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2007, 31(2):285-309.
31. Healey P.G.T., Purver M., Howes Christine Structural divergence in dialogue. Proceedings of architectures and mechanisms for language processing 2010, York, UK, September 2010.
32. Heath C., Luff P. Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1992, 1(1):24-48.
33. Heritage J. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology 1984, Polity Press, Cambridge.
34. Heritage J., Raymond G. Navigating epistemic landscapes: acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. Questions 2005, Cambridge University Press. J.-P. de Ruiter (Ed.).
35. Heritage J. Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2012, 45(1):1-29.
36. Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
37. Jefferson G. On exposed and embedded correction in social interaction. Talk and social organisation 1987, 86-100. Multilingual Matters, Philadelphia. G. Button, J.R.E. Lee (Eds.).
38. Kendon A. The f-formation system: spatial-orientational relations in face to face interaction. Man Environment Systems 1976, 6:291-296.
39. Kecskes I., Mey J.L. Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer 2008, Mouton Series in Pragmatics 4.
40. Krauss R.M., Weinheimer S. Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966, 4(3):343-346.
41. Larsson S. Coordinating on ad-hoc semantic systems in dialogue. Proceedings of DECALOG 2007.
42. Levinson S.C. Pragmatics 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
43. Levinson S.C. Activity types and language. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings 1992, 66-100. Cambridge University Press. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
44. Linell P. Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives 1998, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
45. Louwerse M.M., Dale R., Bard E.G., Jeuniaux P. Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 2012, 36(8):1404-1426.
46. Mills G.J. Semantic coordination in dialogue: the role of direct interaction 2007, PhD Thesis, Queen Mary University of London.
47. Mills G.J. The emergence of procedural conventions in dialogue. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society 2011, Boston, USA.
48. Mills G.J., Healey P.G.T. Clarifying spatial descriptions: local and global effects on semantic coordination. Proceedings of the 10th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue 2006.
49. Mills G.J., Healey P.G. Semantic negotiation in dialogue: the mechanisms of alignment. Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue 2008, 46-53. Association for Computational Linguistics.
50. Mills, G. J. and Healey, P. G. T. The dialogue experimental toolkit, in preparation. The toolkit is available at http://dietsourcecode.sourceforge.net.
51. Newman-Norlund R.D., van Schie H.T., van Zuijlen A.M.J., Bekkering H. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:817-818.
52. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27(2):169-190.
53. Purver M., Ginzburg J., Healey P. On the means for clarification in dialogue. Advances in discourse and dialogue 2002, Kluwer, Available at. http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/pg/purver/publications.html, J. van Kuppevelt, R. Smith (Eds.).
54. Reitter D., Moore J.D., Keller F. Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2006, 685-690. Vancouver, Canada.
55. Riley M.A., Richardson M.J., Shockley K., Ramenzoni V.C. Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in psychology 2011, 2:38.
56. Saxton M. The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language 1997, 24:139-161.
57. Schank R.C., Abelson R.P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding 1977, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
58. Schegloff E.A. Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 1992, 97(5):1295-1345.
59. Scribner S. Thinking in action: some characteristics of practical thought. Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world 1986, 13-30. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.J. Sternberg, R.K. Wagner (Eds.).
60. Schegloff E.A., Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica 1973, 8:289-327.
61. Schegloff E.A. Confirming allusions: toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 1996, 104:61-216.
62. Schegloff E.A. Body torque. Social Research 1998, 65(3):535-596.
63. Schegloff E.A. Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis 2007, Cambridge University Press.
64. Schegloff E.A. Word repeats as unit ends. Discourse Studies 2011, 13(3):367-380.
65. Schlangen D. Causes and strategies for requesting clarification in dialogue. Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue 2004, April, 136-143.
66. Schober M.F., Carstensen L.L. Does being together for years help comprehension?. Expressing oneself/expressing one's self: Communication, cognition, language, and identity 2010, 107-124. Taylor & Francis, London. E. Morsella (Ed.).
67. Schwartz D.L. The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1995, 4(4):321-354.
68. Searle J.R. Speech acts 1969, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
69. Sebanz N., Bekkering H., Knoblich G. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(2):70-76.
70. Simon N. Echolalic speech in childhood autism. Consideration of possible underlying loci of brain damage. Archives of General Psychiatry 1975, 32(11):1439-1446. PMID 812450.
71. Steels L. The evolution of communication systems by adaptive agents. Adaptive agents and multi-agents systems 2003, 125-140. Springer Verlag.
72. Steensig J., Drew P. Introduction: questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies 2008, 10:5-15.
73. Stivers T., Robinson J.D. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 2006, 35(03):367-392.
74. Sterponi L., Fasulo A. How to go on: intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos 2010, 38(1):116-142. ISSN 0091-2131.
75. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations 1958, Blackwell, Oxford.