The emergence of procedural conventions in dialogue

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 471-476

  Mills, Gregory J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

(mis)communication; co ordination; conventions; conversation analysis; Dialogue; language games; routines; sequentiality

Indexed keywords

(MIS)COMMUNICATION; CO-ORDINATION; COLLABORATIVE TASKS; CONVENTION; CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; DIALOG; LANGUAGE GAMES; MIS-COMMUNICATION; ROUTINE; SEQUENTIALITY;

EID: 84880008079     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27, 195-225.
2. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 737–767.
4. Garrod, S. & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, coordination and convention. Cognition, 53, 181–215.
5. Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31(6), 961–987.
6. th Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society. Stanford University, CA.
7. Healey, P. G. T. (2004). Dialogue in the degenerate case? Peer commentary on Pickering & Garrod (2004). Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 201.
8. Healey, P. G. T. & Mills, G. (2006). Participation, precedence and co-ordination. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Canada.
9. Healey, P. G. T. and Mills, G. (2011 in prep) DiET: The Dialogue Experimental Toolkit.
10. Healey, P. G. T., Swoboda, N., Umata, I., & King, J. (2007). Graphical Language Games: Interactional constraints on representational form. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31(2), 285–309.
11. Heritage, P. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Krauss, R. M. and Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (3), 343–346.
13. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. CUP, Cambridge.
14. Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press.
15. Millikan, R. (2005) Language: A Biological Model, OUP.
16. Pickering, M. J. and Garrod, S. (2004). Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190.
17. Schegloff, E.A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9 (2/3), 111-151.
18. Schegloff E. A. (1992) Repair after next turn AJS 97(5).
19. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(4), 321–354.
20. Scott-Phillips, T., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G. (2009). Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–33.
21. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford.