Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): Final results

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 94-105

  Sardanelli, Francesco ^a   Podo, Franca ^b   Santoro, Filippo ^b   Manoukian, Siranoush ^c   Bergonzi, Silvana ^c   Trecate, Giovanna ^c   Vergnaghi, Daniele ^c   Federico, Massimo ^d   Cortesi, Laura ^d   Corcione, Stefano ^e   Morassut, Sandro ^f   Di Maggio, Cosimo ^g   Cilotti, Anna ^h   Martincich, Laura ⁱ   Calabrese, Massimo ^j   Zuiani, Chiara ^k   Preda, Lorenzo ^l   Bonanni, Bernardo ^l   Carbonaro, Luca A ^a   Contegiacomo, Alma ^m   Panizza, Pietro ⁿ   Di Cesare, Ernesto ^o   Savarese, Antonella ^p   Crecco, Marcello ^q   Turchetti, Daniela ^r   Tonutti, Maura ^s   Belli, Paolo ^t   Maschio, Alessandro Del ⁿ   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^f CENTRO DI RIFERIMENTO ONCOLOGICO   (Italy)

^g VENETO INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY IOV IRCCS   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

ⁱ CANDIOLO CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^j UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^k SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^l EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^m UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

ⁿ SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^o UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^p Department of Medical Oncology ^*  (United States)

^q REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^r UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^s UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^t CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

BRCA1 2; breast neoplasms; high risk of breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); mammography; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RISK; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOGENE; OVARY CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELATIVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78751640767     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f3fcdf     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Feig SA. Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved. Breast J. 2005;11(suppl 1):S3-S6.
2. Dent R, Warner E. Screening for hereditary breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2007;34:392-400.
3. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347-360. (Pubitemid 34977137)
4. De Koning HJ. Mammographic screening: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1185-1189.
5. Harris R. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1021-1023.
6. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD001877.
7. Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N, et al. IMPACT Working Group. Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:423-427.
8. Allgood PC, Warwick J, Warren RM, et al. A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:206-209.
9. Robson M, Offit K. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. New Engl J Med. 2007;357:154-162.
10. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology. 2000;215:267-279.
11. Podo F, Sardanelli F, Canese R, et al. The Italian multi-centre project on evaluation of MRI and other imaging modalities in early detection of breast cancer in subjects at high genetic risk. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002; 21(suppl):115-124.
12. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427-437.
13. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammogra-phy, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292:1317-1325. (Pubitemid 39223222)
14. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. International Breast MRI Consortium Working Group. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103: 1898-1905.
15. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8469-8476.
16. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005;365: 1769-1778.
17. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology. 2007;244:381-388.
18. Hagen AI, Kvistad KA, Maehle L, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series. Breast. 2007;16:367-374.
19. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimo-dality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology. 2007;242:698-715.
20. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and prema-lignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6144-6152.
21. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, et al. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology. 2008;246:116-124.
22. Liberman L. Breast cancer screening with MRI-what are the data for patients at high risk? N Engl J Med. 2004;351:497-500.
23. Sardanelli F, Podo F. Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection? Eur Radiol. 2007;17:873-887.
24. Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1905-1917.
25. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:671-679.
26. Leach MO. Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:17-27.
27. Lee JM, Kopans DB, McMahon PM, et al. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR imaging-Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis. Radiology. 2008;246:763-771.
28. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
29. Sardanelli F, Podo F. Women with history of breast cancer excluded from screening programs: is it the right choice? Radiology. 2005;234:971.
30. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology 1998.
31. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol. 2001;36:217-225.
32. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Atlas. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology 2003.
33. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.
34. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, et al. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1087-1092.
35. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:409-430.
36. Medina LS, Zurakowski D. Measurement variability and confidence intervals in medicine: why should radiologists care? Radiology. 2003;226:297-301.
37. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with X-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:412-442.
38. Antoniou AC, Easton DF. Risk prediction models for familial breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2006;2:257-274.
39. Moller P, Evans DG, Reis MM, et al. Surveillance for familial breast cancer: differences in outcome according to BRCA mutation status. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1017-1020.
40. Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, et al. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1450-1457.
41. Sardanelli F, Podo F. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1663.
42. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Berg CD, Visvanathan K, et al. Estimated risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening for young BRCA mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:205-209.
43. Short SC, Bourne S, Martindale C, et al. DNA damage responses at low radiation doses. Radiat Res. 2005;164:292-302.
44. Heyes GJ, Mill AJ, Charles MW. Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses. J Radiol Prot. 2009;29:A123-A132.
45. Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, et al. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:553-558.
46. Carbonaro LA, Verardi N, Di Leo G, et al. Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:114-120.