A gradient boosting algorithm for survival analysis via direct optimization of concordance index

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Chen, Yifei ^a   Jia, Zhenyu ^b,c,d   Mercola, Dan ^d,e   Xie, Xiaohui ^a,d  

^a Irvine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^c Northeast Ohio Medical University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LARGE DATASET; RISK PERCEPTION;

BREAST CANCER PROGNOSIS; CONCORDANCE INDEX; DIRECT OPTIMIZATION; ENSEMBLE MODELING; GRADIENT BOOSTING; NON-PARAMETRIC MODEL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

BIOINFORMATICS;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCORDANCE INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING ALGORITHM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERFORMANCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; QUALITY CONTROL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST TUMOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SOFTWARE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84890101314     PISSN: 1748670X     EISSN: 17486718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/873595     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cox D. R., Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1972 34 2 187 220
2. Cox D. R., Partial likelihood. Biometrika 1975 62 2 269 276 2-s2.0-0016794660
3. Andersen P. K., Gill R. D., Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. The Annals of Statistics 1982 10 4 1100 1120 10.1214/aos/1176345976
4. Martinussen T., Scheike T. H., Dynamic Regression Models For Survival Data 2006 New York, NY, USA Springer
5. Faraggi D., Simon R., A neural network model for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 1995 14 1 73 82 2-s2.0-0028855843
6. Mariani L., Coradini D., Biganzoli E., Boracchi P., Marubini E., Pilotti S., Salvadori B., Silvestrini R., Veronesi U., Zucali R., Rilke F., Prognostic factors for metachronous contralateral breast cancer: a comparison of the linear Cox regression model and its artificial neural network extension. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1997 44 2 167 178 2-s2.0-8244219678 10.1023/A: 1005765403093 (Pubitemid 27248465)
7. Ripley R. M., Harris A. L., Tarassenko L., Neural network models for breast cancer prognosis. Neural Computing and Applications 1998 7 4 367 375 2-s2.0-0032261833 (Pubitemid 128450147)
8. Ripley R. M., Harris A. L., Tarassenko L., Non-linear survival analysis using neural networks. Statistics in Medicine 2004 23 5 825 842 2-s2.0-1442350707 10.1002/sim.1655 (Pubitemid 38279515)
9. Friedman J. H., Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics 2001 29 5 1189 1232 2-s2.0-0035470889 (Pubitemid 33405972)
10. Friedman J. H., Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2002 38 4 367 378 2-s2.0-0037186544 10.1016/S0167-9473(01) 00065-2 (Pubitemid 34197167)
11. Ridgeway G., The state of boosting. Computing Science and Statistics 1999 31 172 181
12. Ridgeway G., Generalized boosted models: a guide to the gbm package. 2007
13. Shivaswamy P. K., Chu W., Jansche M., A support vector approach to censored targets. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM '07) October 2007 655 660 2-s2.0-49749098490 10.1109/ICDM.2007.93
14. van Belle V., Pelckmans K., van Huffel S., Suykens J. A. K., Support vector methods for survival analysis: a comparison between ranking and regression approaches. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2011 53 2 107 118 2-s2.0-80052431188 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.006
15. Cawley G. C., Talbot N. L. C., Janacek G. J., Peck M. W., Sparse bayesian kernel survival analysis for modeling the growth domain of microbial pathogens. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2006 17 2 471 481 2-s2.0-33644890436 10.1109/TNN.2005.863452 (Pubitemid 43380068)
16. Evers L., Messow C.-M., Sparse kernel methods for high-dimensional survival data. Bioinformatics 2008 24 14 1632 1638 2-s2.0-47049127967 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn253 (Pubitemid 351966163)
17. Hothorn T., Bühlmann P., Dudoit S., Molinaro A., van der Laan M. J., Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 2006 7 3 355 373 2-s2.0-33745466826 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011 (Pubitemid 43955046)
18. Ishwaran H., Kogalur U. B., Blackstone E. H., Lauer M. S., Random survival forests. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2008 2 3 841 860
19. Harrell F. E. Jr., Califf R. M., Pryor D. B., Lee K. L., Rosati R. A., Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Journal of the American Medical Association 1982 247 18 2543 2546 2-s2.0-0020076740 10.1001/jama.247.18.2543 (Pubitemid 12155954)
20. Harrell F. E., Lee K. L., Mark D. B., Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 1996 15 4 361 387 (Pubitemid 26072233)
21. Yan L., Verbel D., Saidi O., Predicting prostate cancer recurrence via maximizing the concordance index. Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining August 2004 ACM 479 485 2-s2.0-12244272666
22. Raykar V. C., Steck H., Krishnapuram B., Dehing-Oberije C., Lambin P., Platt J. C., Koller D., Singer Y., Roweis S., On ranking in survival analysis: bounds on the concordance index. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 2008 Cambridge, Mass, USA The MIT Press 1209 1216
23. Khosla A., Cao Y., Lin C. C.-Y., Chiu H.-K., Hu J., Lee H., An integrated machine learning approach to stroke prediction. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining July 2010 ACM 183 191 2-s2.0-77956220482 10.1145/1835804.1835830
24. Roxbee Cox D., Oakes D., Analysis of Survival Data 1984 21 Boca Raton, Fla, USA Chapman & Hall/CRC
25. Allison P. D., Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide 2010 SAS Institute
26. mccullagh P., Nelder J. A., Generalized Linear Models 1989 37 Boca Raton, Fla, USA Chapman & Hall/CRC
27. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R., The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction 2009 New York, NY, USA Springer
28. Curtis C., Shah S. P., Chin S. F., Turashvili G., Rueda O. M., Dunning M. J., Speed D., Lynch A. G., Samarajiwa S., Yuan Y., The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 2012 486 7403 346 352
29. Margolin A. A., Bilal E., Huang E., Systematic analysis of challenge-driven improvements in molecular prognostic models for breast cancer. Science Translational Medicine 2013 5 181 181re1 181re1
30. Ishwaran H., Kogalur U. B., Random survival forests for r. New Functions for Multivariate Analysis, p. 25, 2007
31. Cheng W. Y., Ou Yang T. H., Anastassiou D., Biomolecular events in cancer revealed by attractor metagenes. Plos Computational Biology 2013 9 2 e1002920
32. Zupan B., Demšar J., Kattan M. W., Beck J. R., Bratko I., Machine learning for survival analysis: a case study on recurrence of prostate cancer. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2000 20 1 59 75 2-s2.0-0343081009 10.1016/S0933-3657(00)00053-1 (Pubitemid 30645575)
33. Kattan M. W., Comparison of Cox regression with other methods for determining prediction models and nomograms. The Journal of Urology 2003 170 6 S6 S10 2-s2.0-0242608650 10.1097/01.ju.0000094764.56269.2d (Pubitemid 37413936)
34. Freund Y., Iyer R., Schapire R. E., Singer Y., An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2004 4 6 933 969 2-s2.0-4644367942 10.1162/1532443041827916
35. Burges C. J. C., Svore K. M., Bennett P. N., Pastusiak A., Wu Q., Learning to rank using an ensemble of lambda-gradient models. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011 14 25 35