The role of trust as a mediator between signaling system reliability and response behaviors

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 285-289

  Chancey, Eric T ^a   Proaps, Alexandra ^a   Bliss, James P ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE STUDENTS; RELIABLE SYSTEMS; RESPONSE BEHAVIOR; RESPONSE FREQUENCY; RESPONSE RATE; SIGNALING SYSTEMS; SUBJECTIVE TRUST; TRUST ASSESSMENTS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; STUDENTS; SURVEYS;

ALARM SYSTEMS;

EID: 84889778350     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213571063     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
3. Bliss, J. P., Gilson, R. D., & Deaton, J. E. (1995). Human probability matching behavior in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics, 38 (11), 2300-2312.
4. Bliss, J. P., & Gilson, R. D. (1998). Emergency signal failure: Implications and recommendations. Ergonomics, 41 (1), 57-72.
5. Bliss, J. P., Liebman, R., & Chancey, E. (2012). Training time estimation to improve reactions. Work, 41, 3580-3585.
6. Breznitz, S. (1984). Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bustamante, E. A. (2009). A reexamination of the mediating effect of trust among alarm systems' characteristics and human compliance and reliance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting (pp. 249-253). Las Vegas, NV.
8. Chancey, E.T. (2012) The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors (Master's thesis).Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
9. Chancey, E. T., & Bliss, J. P. (1012). Reliability of a cued combat identification aid on Soldier performance and trust. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
10. Dixon, S. R., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48 (3), 474-486.
11. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors, 49 (4), 564-572.
12. Getty, D. J., Swets, J. A., Pickett, R. M., & Gonthier, D. (1995). System operator response to warnings of danger: A laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1 (1), 19-33.
13. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
14. Jian, J., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4 (53), 53-71.
15. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35 (10), 1243-1270.
16. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153-184.
17. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46 (1), 50-80.
18. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8 (4), 277-301.
19. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43 (4), 563-572.
20. Meyer, J. (2004). Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors, 46 (2), 196-204.
21. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., & Itoh, M. (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6 (1), 44-58.
22. Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 527-539.
23. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 81-103.
24. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39 (2), 230-253.
25. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (4), 717-731.
26. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879-891.
27. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115.
28. Pritchett, A. R. (2001). Reviewing the role of cockpit alerting systems. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1 (1), 5-38.
29. Rice, S. (2009). Examining single- And multiple-process theories of trust in automation. The Journal of General Psychology, 13 (3), 303-319.
30. Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Hunt, G., & Keller, D. (2010). We don't dislike the alarm: We dislike complying with the alarm. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 6(1), 93-105.
31. Safar, J. A., & Turner, C. W. (2005). Validation of a two factor structure for system trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, (pp. 497-501). Orlando, FL.
32. Sampson, R. (2002). False burglar alarms. (Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Series, Report No. 5). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
33. Wang, L., Jamieson, G. A., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. Human Factors, 51 (3), 281-291.
34. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8 (3), 201-212.
35. Wiczorek, R., & Manzey, D. (2010). Is operators' compliance with alarm systems a product of rational consideration? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1722-1726). San Francisco, CA.
36. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H. (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 2 (4), 352-367.