A reexamination of the mediating effect of trust among alarm systems' characteristics and human compliance and reliance

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 249-253

  Bustamante, Ernesto A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS;

CONTENTION-BASED; DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; MEDIATING EFFECT;

ALARM SYSTEMS;

EID: 77951606388     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118109x12524441080344     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bliss, J. P. (1994). The cry-wolf phenomenon and its effect on alarm responses. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 54(9-B), 4948.
2. Breznitz, S. (1983). Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bustamante, E. A. (2008). Implementing likelihood alarm technology in integrated aviation displays for enhancing decision making: A two-stage signal detection modeling approach. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 8(2), 241-262.
4. Comstock, J. R., & Arnegard, R. J. (1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human pilot workload and strategic behavior research (NASA Technical Memorandum No. 104174). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center.
5. Dixon, S. R. (2007). Imperfect diagnostic automation: How adjusting bias and saliency affects operator trust. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 67(11-B), 6759.
6. Fallon, C. K., Bustamante, E. A., Ely, K. M., & Bliss, J. P. (2005). Improving user trust with a likelihood alarm display. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Las Vegas, NV.
7. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
8. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
9. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007a). Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors. 49(5), 773-785. (Pubitemid 47442101)
10. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007b). Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 8(4), 277-301.
11. Masalonis, A. J. (2001). Effects of situation-specific reliability on trust and usage of automated decision aids (decision support). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 61(9-B), 5034.
12. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors. 43(4), 563-572.
13. Parasuraman, R. & Miller, C. A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 51-55.
14. Rice, S. (in press). Examining single and multiple-process theories of trust in automation. Journal of General Psychology.
15. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 8(3), 201-212.