Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 303-322

  Rice, Stephen ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Dependence; State; Trace; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651102420     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GENP.136.3.303-322     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1982). Ironies of automation. In G. Johannsen & J. E. Rijnsdorp (Eds.), Analysis, design, and evaluation of man-machine systems (pp. 151-157). Baden Baden, Germany: Pergamon.
2. Bamber, D. (1979). State trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 137-181.
3. Bliss, J. (2003). An investigation of alarm related accidents and incidents in aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 249-268.
4. Breznitz, S. (1983). Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dixon, S. R., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48, 474-486.
6. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & Chang, D. (2005). Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: A workload analysis. Human Factors, 47, 479-487.
7. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors, 49, 564-572.
8. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95(1), 91-101.
9. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (1999). Misuse and disuse of automated aids. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 339-343). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10. Fisher, D. L., & Tan, K. C. (1989). Visual displays: The highlighting paradox. Human Factors, 31, 17-30.
11. Hammer, J. M. (1999). Human factors of functionality and intelligent avionics. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of human factors in aviation (pp. 549-565). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Harley, E. M., Dillon, A. M., & Loftus, G. R. (2004). Why is it difficult to see in the fog? How stimulus contrast affects visual perception and visual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11, 197-231.
13. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operator's adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153-184.
14. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
15. MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (2003). New alternative methods in analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition. Human Factors, 45, 281-295.
17. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43, 563-572.
18. Meyer, J. (2004). Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors, 46, 196-204.
19. Morison, S. E. (1965). The Oxford history of the American people. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
21. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 30, 286-297.
22. Rice, S., & McCarley, J. (2008, July). The effects of automation bias and saliency on operator trust. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
23. Sorkin, R. D., & Woods, D. D. (1985). Systems with human monitors, a signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 49-75.
24. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 8, 201-212.
25. Wickens, C. D., Dixon, S. R., Goh, J., & Hammer, B. (2005). Pilot dependence on imperfect diagnostic automation in simulated UAV flights: An attentional visual scanning analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Symposium of Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
26. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Wickens, C. D., Kroft, P., & Yeh, M. (2000). Data base overlay in electronic map design: Testing a computational model. In Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 3-451-3-454). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
28. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Display signaling in augmented reality: Effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration. Human Factors, 43, 355-365.
29. Yeh, M., Wickens, C. D., & Seagull, F. J. (1999). Target cuing in visual search: The effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention. Human Factors, 41, 524-542.
30. Young, L. R. (1969). On adaptive manual control. Ergonomics, 12, 635-675.