Exploration or exploitation? Small firms' alliance strategies with large firms

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 146-157

  Yang, Haibin ^a   Zheng, Yanfeng ^b   Zhao, Xia ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

alliance strategy; exploitation alliances; exploration alliances; large firms; small firms

Indexed keywords

ALLIANCE STRATEGY; BIOPHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; EXPLOITATION ALLIANCES; EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION/EXPLOITATION; LARGE FIRMS; RELATIVE IMPACT; SMALL FIRM;

MANAGEMENT; PLANNING;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84889686652     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2082     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM,. 1988. Innovation over time and in historical context: patterns of industrial innovation. In Reading in the Management of Innovation (2nd edn), Tushman ML, Moore WL, (eds). Ballinger Publishing Company: Cambridge, MA.
2. Aiken LS, West SG,. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage: London, UK.
3. Alvarez SA, Barney JB,. 2001. How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive 15 (1): 139-148.
4. Carson SJ, Madhok A, Wu T,. 2006. Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: the effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal 49 (5): 1058-1077.
5. Coleman JS,. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120.
6. Deeds DL, Hill CWL,. 1998. An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing 14 (2): 141-163.
7. Doz YL,. 1988. Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: some critical issues. In Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Contractor FJ, Lorange P, (eds). Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.
8. Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W,. 2000. Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2): 99-126.
9. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB,. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7 (2): 136-150.
10. Gulati R,. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19 (4): 293-317.
11. Gulati R, Nickerson JA,. 2008. Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science 19 (5): 688-708.
12. Gulati R, Singh H,. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (4): 781-814.
13. Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE,. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 693-706.
14. He ZL, Wong PK,. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15 (4): 481-494.
15. Hoang H, Rothaermel FT,. 2010. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal 31 (7): 734-758.
16. Hoetker G, Mellewigt T,. 2009. Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal 30 (10): 1025-1044.
17. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Webb JW,. 2005. Entrepreneurial alliances and networks. In Handbook of Strategic Alliances, Reuer JJ, Shenkar O, (eds). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA; 333-352.
18. Kale P, Dyer JH, Singh H,. 2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal 23 (8): 747-767.
19. Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM,. 2008. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (2): 295-332.
20. Keats BW, Hitt MA,. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics and performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (3): 570-598.
21. King DR, Covin JG, Hegarty WH,. 2003. Complementary resources and the exploitation of technological innovations. Journal of Management 29 (4): 589-606.
22. Klein B,. 1980. Transaction cost determinants of "unfair" contractual arrangements. American Economic Review 70 (2): 356-362.
23. Koza M, Lewin A,. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science 9 (1): 255-264.
24. Lavie D,. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal 28 (12): 1187-1212.
25. Lavie D, Rosenkopf L,. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 797-818.
26. Lin Z, Yang H, Demirkan I,. 2007. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: empirical investigation and computer simulation. Management Science 53 (10): 1645-1658.
27. March J,. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 71-87.
28. McGrath RG,. 2001. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 118-131.
29. Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS,. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
30. Phelps CC,. 2010. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal 53 (4): 890-913.
31. Pisano GP,. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 153-176.
32. Poppo L, Zenger T,. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23 (8): 707-725.
33. Rothaermel FT,. 2001. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6-7): 687-699.
34. Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL,. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal 25 (3): 201-221.
35. Rothaermel FT, Hess AM,. 2007. Building dynamic capabilities: innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science 18 (6): 898-921.
36. Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B,. 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 15 (5): 387-394.
37. Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybel R,. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2): 315-350.
38. Teece DJ,. 1992. Competition, co-operation and innovation: organizational arrangement for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18 (1): 1-25.
39. Westphal JD, Zajac EJ,. 2001. Decoupling policy from practice: the case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (2): 202-228.
40. Wooldridge J,. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross-section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
41. Yang H, Lin Z, Peng MW,. 2011. Behind acquisitions of alliance partners: exploratory learning and network embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal 54 (5): 1069-1080.
42. Zheng Y, Liu J, George G,. 2010. The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: a longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing 25 (6): 593-609.