Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

NeuroImage

Volumn 85, Issue , 2014, Pages 961-970

  Luber, Bruce ^a,b   Lisanby, Sarah H ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive performance; Enhancement; Facilitation; TMS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BRAIN DAMAGE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FACILITATION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT DURATION; WORKING MEMORY;

COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; ENHANCEMENT; FACILITATION; TMS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84889657557     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.007     Document Type: Review

References (146)

1. Alford J.L., Van Donkelaar P., Dassonville P., Marrcco R.T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7(3):225-232.
2. Balslev D., Braet W., McCallister C., Miall R.C. Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 2007, 162:309-313.
3. Bashir S., Mizrahi I., Weaver K., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A. Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation. PM R 2010, 2(Suppl. 2):S253-S268.
4. Berardelli A., Inghilleri M., Rothwell J.C., et al. Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 122:79-84.
5. Bliss T.V., Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. 1973, 232:331-356.
6. Bliss T.V., Collingridge G.L., Morris R.G. Introduction. Longterm potentiation and structure of the issue. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358:607-611.
7. Boroojerdi B., Phipps M., Kopylev L., Wharton C.M., Cohen L.G., Grafman J. Enhancing analogic reasoning with rTMS over the left prefrontal cortex. Neurology 2001, 56:526-528.
8. Boyd L.A., Linsdell M.A. Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to left dorsal premotor cortex enhances motor consolidation of new skills. BMC Neurosci. 2009, 10(72):1471-2202.
9. Butefisch C.M., Khurana V., Kopylev L., Cohen L.G. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:2110-2116.
10. Buzsaki G., Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 2004, 304:1926-1929.
11. Campana G., Cowey A., Walsh V. Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 12:663-669.
12. Cappa S.F., Sandrini M., Rossini P.M., Sosta K., Miniussi C. The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming: rTMS evidence. Neurology 2002, 59(5):720-723.
13. Cardenas-Morales L., Gron G., Kammer T. Exploring the after-effects of theta burst magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex: a functional imaging study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32:1948-1960.
14. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Vecchi T., Silvanto J. Using state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS-priming and TMS-adaptation paradigms. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1924-1929.
15. Cattaneo Z., Vecchi T., Pascual-Leone A., Silvanto J. Contrasting early visual cortical activation states causally involved in visual imagery and short-term memory. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 30:1393-1400.
16. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Walsh V., Vecchi T., Silvanto J. TMS-adaptation reveals abstract letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2321-2325.
17. Cattaneo L., Sandrini M., Schwarzbach J. State-dependent TMS reveals a hierarchical representation of observed acts in the temporal, parietal, and premotor cortices. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2252-2258.
18. Chen R., Classen J., Gerloff C., Celnik P., Wassermann E.M., Hallett M., Cohen L.G. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997, 48:1398-1403.
19. Cicerone K., Levin H., Malec J., Stuss D., Whyte J. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1212-1222.
20. Cohen-Kadosh R., Muggleton N., Silvanto J., Walsh V. Double dissociation of format-dependent and number-specific neurons in human parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2166-2171.
21. Cooper A.C.G., Humphreys G.W., Hulleman J., Praamstra P., Georgeson M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 155:24-29.
22. Cotelli M., Manenti R., Cappa S.F., Geroldi C., Zanetti O., Rossini P.M., Miniussi C. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on action naming in patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 2006, 63:1602-1604.
23. Cotelli M., Manenti R., Cappa S.F., Zanetti O., Miniussi C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves naming in Alzheimer disease patients at different stages of cognitive decline. Eur. J. Neurol. 2008, 15:1286-1292.
24. Cotelli M., Calabria M., et al. Improved language performance in Alzheimer disease following brain stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2011, 82:794-797.
25. Crick F., Koch C. Some reflections on visual awareness. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1990, 55:953-962.
26. Desmond J.E., Chen S.H.A., Shieh P.B. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 58:550-553.
27. Drager B., Breitenstein C., Helmke U., Kamping S., Knecht S. Specific and nonspecific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on picture-word verification. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20:1681-1687.
28. Ellison A., Battelli L., Cowey A., Walsh V. The effect of expectation on facilitation of color/form conjunction tasks by TMS over area V5. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1794-1801.
29. Emara T.H., Moustafa R.R., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1Hz and 5Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010, 17:1203-1209.
30. Esser S.K., Hill S.L., Tononi G. Modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical circuits. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:622-639.
31. Esser S.K., Huber R., Massimini M., Peterson M.J., Ferrarelli F., Tononi G. A direct demonstration of cortical LTP in humans: a combined TMS/EEG study. Brain Res. Bull. 2006, 69:86-94.
32. Evers S., Bockermann I., Nyhuis P.W. The impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive processing: an event-related potential study. Neuroreport 2001, 12(13):2915-2918.
33. Feredoes E., Tononi G., Postle B.R. The neural bases of the short-term storage of verbal information are anatomically variable across individuals. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11003-11008.
34. Fox J.J., Schroeder C.E. The case for feedforward multisensory convergence during early cortical processing. Neuroreport 2005, 16:419-423.
35. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke 2006, 37(2):115-2122.
36. Freunberger R., Werkle-Bergner M., Griesmayr B., Lindenberger U., Klimesch W. Brain oscillatory correlates of working memory constraints. Brain Res. 2011, 1375:93-102.
37. Fuggetta G., Pavone E.F., Fiaschi A., Manganotti P. Acute modulation of cortical oscillatory activities during short trains of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: a combined EEG and TMS study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29:1-13.
38. Funke K., Benali A. Cortical cellular actions of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2010, 28:399-417.
39. Gagnon G., Schneider C., Grondin S., Blanchet S. Enhancement of episodic memory in young and healthy adults: a paired-pulse TMS study on encoding and retrieval performance. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 488:138-142.
40. Galea J.M., Albert N.B., Ditye T., Miall R.C. Disruption of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates the consolidation of procedural skills. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1158-1164.
41. Grosbras M.H., Paus T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14:1109-1120.
42. Grosbras M.H., Paus T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field facilitates visual awareness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18:3121-3126.
43. Habeck C., Rakitin B.C., et al. An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of SD on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 18:306-321.
44. Hamada M., Strigaro G., et al. Cerebellar modulation of human associative plasticity. J. Physiol. 2012, 590(10):2365-2374.
45. Hamidi M., Tononi G., Postle B.R. Evaluating the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in memory-guided response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:295-302.
46. Hamidi M., Slagter H.A., Tononi G., Postle B.R. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation affects behavior by biasing endogenous cortical oscillations. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2009, 3. 10.3389/neuro.07.014.2009.
47. Hamidi M., Johnson J.S., Feredoes E., Postle B.R. Does high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation produce residual and/or cumulative effects within an experimental session?. Brain Topogr. 2011, 23:355-367.
48. Hannula H., Neuvonen T., et al. Increasing top-down suppression from prefrontal cortex facilitates tactile working memory. Neuroimage 2010, 49:1091-1098.
49. Harris I.M., Benito C.T., Ruzzoli M., Miniussi C. Effects of right parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation on object identification and orientation judgments. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:916-926.
50. Hayward G., Goodwin G.M., Harmer C.J. The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the counting Stroop task. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 154:355-358.
51. Herwig U., Abler B., et al. Verbal storage in a premotor-parietal network: evidence from fMRI-guided magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1032-1041.
52. Hilgetag C.C., Hugo T., Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 953-957.
53. Hodsoll J., Mevorach C., Humphreys G.W. Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(1):106-114.
54. Homan R.W., Herman J., Purdy P. Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 66:376-382.
55. Hoogendam J.M., Ramakers G.M.J., DiLazzaro D. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul. 2011, 3:95-118.
56. Hwang J.H., Kim S.H., Park C.S., Bang S.A., Kim S.E. Acute high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and attentional control in healthy young men. Brain Res. 2010, 1329:152-158.
57. Iriki A., Pavlides C., Keller A., Asanuma H. Long-term potentiation in the motor cortex. Science 1989, 245:1385-1387.
58. Jung P., Ziemann U. Homeostatic and nonhomeostatic modulation of learning in human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:5597-5604.
59. Kalla R., Muggleton N.G., Cowey A., Walsh V. Human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved in visual search for conjunctions but not features: a theta TMS study. Cortex 2009, 45:1085-1090.
60. Kammer T., Beck S., Thielscher A., Laubis-Herrmann U., Topka H. Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:250-258.
61. Khedr E.M., Ahmed M.A., Fathy N., Rothwell J.C. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005, 65:466-468.
62. Kim Y.H., You S.H., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006, 37:1471-1476.
63. Kirschen M.P., Davis-Ratner M.S., Jerde T.E., Schraedley-Desmond P., Desmond J.E. Enhancement of phonological memory following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Behav. Neurol. 2006, 17(3-4):187-194.
64. Klimesch W., Sauseng P., Gerloff C. Enhancing cognitive performance with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at human individual alpha frequency. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17:1129-1133.
65. Knecht S., Floel A., et al. Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:695-699.
66. Kobayashi M. Effect of slow repetitive TMS of the motor cortex on ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements and motor skill learning. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2010, 28:437-448.
67. Kobayashi M., Hutchinson S., Theoret H., Schlaug G., Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 2004, 62:91-98.
68. Kobayashi M., Theoret H., Pascual-Leone A. Suppression of ipsilateral motor cortex facilitates motor skill learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:833-836.
69. Koch G., Oliveri M., Torriero S., Carlesimo G.A., Turriziani P., Caltagirone C. rTMS evidence of different delay and decision processes in a fronto-parietal neuronal network activated during spatial working memory. Neuroimage 2005, 24:34-39.
70. Kohler S., Paus T., Buckner R.L., Milner B. Effect of left inferior prefrontal stimulation on episodic memory formation: a two-stage fMRI-rTMS study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 16:178-188.
71. Koski L., Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M. Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS. Neuroimage 2005, 24:296-305.
72. Lakatos P., Shah A.S., Knuth K.H., Ulbert I., Karmos G., Shroeder C.E. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:1904-1911.
73. Lim J., Dinges D.F. Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1129:305-322.
74. Lou H., Luber B., Stanford A.D., Lisanby S.H. Self-specific processing in the default network: a single-pulse TMS study. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 207:27-38.
75. Luber B., Kinnunen L.H., Rakitin B.C., Ellsasser R., Stern Y., Lisanby S.H. Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the precuneus: frequency and time-dependent effects. Brain Res. 2007, 1128:120-129.
76. Luber B., Balsam P., Nguyen T., Gross M., Lisanby S.H. Classical conditioned learning using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 183:361-369.
77. Luber B., Stanford A.D., et al. Remediation of sleep-deprivation induced visual working memory impairment with fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2077-2085.
78. Luber B., Steffener J., et al. Extended remediation of sleep deprivation-induced working memory deficits using fMRI-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stim-ulation. Sleep 2013, 36:857-871.
79. Mansur C.G., Fregni F., Boggio P.S., et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005, 64:1802-1804.
80. Matthaus L., Trillenberg P., Fadini T., Finke M., Schweikard A. Brain mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation using a refined correlation ratio and Kendall's tau. Stat. Med. 2008, 27:5252-5270.
81. McKinley R.A., Bridges N., Walters C.M., Nelson J. Modulating the brain at work using noninvasive transcranial stimulation. Neuroimage 2012, 59:129-137.
82. Miniussi C., Ruzzoli M., Walsh V. The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition. Cortex 2010, 46:128-130.
83. Mottaghy F.M., Hungs M., et al. Facilitation of picture naming after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1999, 53(8):1806-1812.
84. Mottaghy F.M., Gangitano M., Sparing R., Pascual-Leone A. Segregation of areas related to visual working memory in the prefrontal cortex revealed by rTMS. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12:369-375.
85. Muri R.M., Rivaud S., et al. Role of the prefrontal cortex in the control of express saccades. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:199-206.
86. Nardone R., Bergmann J., et al. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer disease: a review. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, (Article ID 687909, 5 pp.). 10.1155/2012/687909.
87. O'Reardon J.P., Solvason H.B., et al. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62:1208-1216.
88. Oliveri M., Zhaoping L., Mangano G.R., Turriziani P., Smirni D., Cipolotti L. Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(4):1003-1010.
89. Parasurman R., Rizzo M. Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
90. Pascual-Leone A., Hallett M. Induction of errors in a delayed response task by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroreport 1994, 5:2517-2520.
91. Pascual-Leone A., Valls-Sollé J., Wassermann E.M., Brasil-Neto J., Cohen L.G., Hallett M. Effects of focal transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli. Brain 1992, 115:1045-1059.
92. Pascual-Leone A., Houser C.M., et al. Safety of rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal volunteers. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993, 89:120-130.
93. Pascual-Leone A., Valls-Sole J., Wassermann E.M., Hallett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994, 117:847-858.
94. Pascual-Leone A., Bartres-Faz D., Keenan J.P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999, 354:1229-1238.
95. Peinemann A., Reimer B., Loer C., Quartarone A., Munchau A., Conrad B., Siebner H.R. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(7):1519-1526.
96. Peterchev A.V., Murphy D.L., Lisanby S.H. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:036016.
97. Ragert P., Dinse H.R., et al. Combination of 5Hz repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) and tactile coactivation boosts tactile discrimination in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 348:105-108.
98. Ragert P., Becker M., Tegenthoff M., Pleger B., Dinse H.R. Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by 5Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 356:91-94.
99. Reithler J., Peters J.C., Sack A.T. Multimodal transcranial magnetic stimulation: using concurrent neuroimaging to reveal the neural network dynamics of noninvasive brain stimulation. Prog. Neurobiol. 2011, 94:149-165.
100. Renzi C., Vecchi T., Silvanto J., Cattaneo Z. Overlapping representations of numerical magnitude and motion direction in the posterior parietal cortex: a TMS-adaptation study. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 490:145-149.
101. Romei V., Rihs T., Brodbeck V., Thut G. Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. Neuroreport 2008, 19:203-208.
102. Romei V., Gross J., Thut G. On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input regulation: correlation or causation?. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:8692-8697.
103. Romei V., Driver J., Schyns P.G., Thut G. Rhythmic TMS over parietal cortex links distinct brain frequencies to global versus local visual processing. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:334-337.
104. Rushworth M.F.S., Ellison A., Walsh V. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:656-661.
105. Ruzzoli M., Marzi C.A., Miniussi C. The neural mechanisms of the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on perception. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:2982-2989.
106. Ruzzoli M., Abrahamyan A., Clifford C.W.G., Marzi C.A., Miniussi C., Harris J.A. The effect of TMS on visual motion sensitivity: an increase in neural noise or a decrease in signal strength?. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:138-143.
107. Sack A.T., Cohen Kadosh R., Schuhmann T., Moerel M., Walsh V., Goebel R. Optimizing functional accuracy of TMS in cognitive studies: a comparison of methods. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:207-221.
108. Sakai K.L., Noguchi Y., Takeuchi T., Watanabe E. Selective priming of syntactic processing of event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation of Broca's area. Neuron 2002, 35:1177-1182.
109. Sandburg A., Bostrom N. Converging cognitive enhancements. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1093:201-227.
110. Sauseng P., Klimesch W., Heise K.F., et al. Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1846-1852.
111. Schnitzler A., Gross J. Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:285-296.
112. Schutter D.J., van Honk J. Increased positive emotional memory after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the orbitofrontal cortex. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006, 31(2):101-104.
113. Schwarzkopf D.S., Silvanto J., Rees G. Stochastic resonance effects reveal the neural mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:3143-3147.
114. Seyal M., Ro T., Rafal R. Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe. Ann. Neurol. 1995, 38:264-267.
115. Siebner H.R. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:3379-3385.
116. Silva S., Basser P.J., Miranda P.C. Elucidating the mechanisms and loci of neuronal excitation by transcranial magnetic stimulation using a finite element model of cortical sulcus. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:2405-2413.
117. Silvanto J., Muggleton N. New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2008, 39:549-552.
118. Silvanto J., Muggleton N., Walsh V. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:447-454.
119. Silvanto J., Cattaneo Z., Batteli L., Pascual-Leone A. Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 99:2725-2730.
120. Sirota A., Montgomery S., Fujisawa S., Isomura Y., Zugaro M., Buzsaki G. Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron 2009, 60:683-697.
121. Snyder A.W. Explaining and inducing savant skills: privileged access to lower level, less-processed information. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1399-1405.
122. Snyder A.W., Bahramali H., Hawker T., Mitchell D.J. Savant-like numerosity skills revealed in normal people by magnetic pulses. Perception 2006, 35:837-845.
123. Sole-Padulles C., Bartres-Faz D., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on brain function and cognition among elders with memory dysfunction. A randomized sham-controlled study. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1487-1493.
124. Sparing R., Mottaghy F.M., et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on language function depend on the stimulation parameters. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 18(4):326-330.
125. Stefan K., Kunesch E., Cohen L.G., Benecke R., Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 2000, 123:572-584.
126. Stoeckel C., Gough P.M., Watkins K.E., Devlin J.T. Supramarginal gyrus involvement in visual word recognition. Cortex 2009, 45:1091-1096.
127. Tadin D., Silvanto J., Pascual-Leone A., Battelli L. Improved motion perception and impaired spatial suppression following disruption of cortical area MT/V5. J. Neurosci. 2011, 4:1279-1283.
128. Takeuchi N., Chuma T., Matsuo Y., Watanabe I., Ikoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005, 36:2681-2686.
129. Tegenthoff M., Ragert P., et al. Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5Hz rTMS. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e362.
130. Terao Y., Ugawa Y., et al. Shortening of simple reaction time by peripheral electrical and submotor-threshold magnetic cortical stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 1997, 115(3):541-545.
131. Thickbroom G.W. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 180:583-593.
132. Thielscher A., Opitz A., Windhoff M. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2011, 54:234-243.
133. Thut G., Pascual-Leone A. A review of combined TMS-EEG studies to characterize lasting effects of repetitive TMS and assess their usefulness in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Brain Topogr. 2009, 22:219-232.
134. Thut G., Nietzel A., Pascual-Leone A. Dorsal posterior parietal rTMS affects voluntary orienting of visuospatial attention. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(5):628-638.
135. Thut G., Veniero D., Romei V., Miniussi C., Schyna P., Gross J. Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1176-1185.
136. Topper R., Mottaghy F.M., Brugmann M., Noth J., Huber W. Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's area. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 121:371-378.
137. Touge T., Gerschlager W., Brown P., Rothwell J.C. Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:2138-2145.
138. Van Der Werf Y.D., Paus T. The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. I. Intracortical and cortico-cortical contributions. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 175:231-245.
139. Van Ettinger-Veenstra H.M., Huijbers W., Gutteling T.P., Vink M., Kenemans J.L., Neggers S.F.W. fMRI-guided TMS on cortical eye fields: the frontal but not intraparietal eye fields regulate the coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:3469-3480.
140. Walsh V., Ellison A., Battelli L., Cowey A. Task-specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1998, 265:537-543.
141. Wang R.-Y., Tseng H.-Y., Liao K.-K., Wang C.-J., Lai K.-L., Yang Y.-R. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2012, 26:222-230.
142. Wassermann E.M., Grafman J., et al. Use and safety of a new repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 101:412-417.
143. Waterston M.L., Pack C.C. Improved discrimination of visual stimuli following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. PLoS One 2010, 5(4):1-10.
144. Wipfli M., Felblinger J., Mosimann U.P., Hess C.W., Schlaepfer T.E., Muri R.M. Double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the frontal eye field facilitates triggering of memory-guided saccades. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 14:571-575.
145. Wolters A., Sandbrink F., Schlottmann A. A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:2339-2345.
146. Yamanaka K., Yamagata B., Tomioka H., Kawasaki S., Mimura M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex facilitates spatial working memory: near infrared spectroscopy study. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1037-1045.