The Impact of Secondary School Students' Preconceptions on the Evolution of their Mental Models of the Greenhouse effect and Global Warming

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 304-333

  Reinfried, Sibylle ^a   Tempelmann, Sebastian ^a  

^a Department of Teaching and Learning   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conceptual development; Greenhouse effect; Learning process analysis; Mental model evolution; Preconception types

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889638401     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.773598     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aebli, H. (1983). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens. Eine Allgemeine Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage, [Twelve basic methods of teaching. General didactics based on psychology] (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Klett
2. Aeschbacher, U., Calò, C., & Wehrli, R. (2001). 'Die Ursache des Treibhauseffektes ist ein Loch in der Atmosphäre': Naives Denken wider besseres Wissen ['The reason for the greenhouse effect is a hole in the atmosphere': Naïve thinking against better knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie, 33(4), 230-241. doi: 10.1026//0049-8637.33.4.230
3. Aeschbacher, U., & Huber, E. (1996). Der Treibhauseffekt-auch eine pädagogische Herausforderung. Entwicklung eines Demonstrationsexperiments als didaktische Forschung [The greenhouse effect-also an educational challenge. Development of a model experiment]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 14(2), 180-190.
4. Al-Diban, S. (2002). Diagnose mentaler Modelle, [Diagnosis of mental models]. Hamburg: Kovac
5. 2 emissions and the problem of Ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1096-1111. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1096::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-8
6. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology. A cognitive view, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
7. Baumert, K. A., Herzog, T., & Pershigh J. (2005). Navigating the numbers. Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. World Resources Institute. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://www.wri.org/publication/navigating-the-numbers.
8. Bord, J.R., O'Connor, R.E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205-218. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
9. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The 'greenhouse effect': Children's perception of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 531-552. doi: 10.1080/0950069930150507
10. Chi, M. T. C. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation and categorial shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, (pp. 61-82). New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, (pp. 417-452). New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Morrison, L. (2011). Research Methods in Education. London & New York: Routledge.
13. DemoEx. (2011). Produkte: Treibhauseffekt [Products: Greenhouse effect]. Retrieved November 24, 2012, from http://www.demoex.ch/?Produkte
14. Dieckmann, A., & Meyer, R. (2007). Der Schweizer Umweltsurvey 2007. Klimawandel, ökologische Risiken und Umweltbewusstsein in der Schweizer Bevölkerung, [Swiss environment survey 2007. Climate change, environmental risks and environmental consciousness in the Swiss population]. Zürich: ETH
15. diSessa, A.A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age, (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. diSessa, A.A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the 'Pieces' vs. 'Coherence' controversy (From the 'Pieces' side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, (pp. 35-60). New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Dole, J.A., & Sinatra, G.M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109-128.
18. Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89-100. doi: 10.1080/1350462960020108
19. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 132, 105-122. doi: 10.1080/03057268608559933
20. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A.L. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Hewson, P.W., A'Becket Hewson, M.G. (1884). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00051837
22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate change 2007. Summary for policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor & H.L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (582 pp.), Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Retrieved March 16, 2012, from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/spms2.html
23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012). In C. B. Field, V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, D. J. Dokken, K. L. Ebi, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S. K. Allen, M. Tignor, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved November 24, 2012, from http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/.
24. Jacobs, J.K., Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J.W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 717-724. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00036-1
25. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models, Cambridge: University Press.
26. Keil, F.C., & Newman, G.E. (2008). Two tales of conceptual change. What changes and what remains the same. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, (pp. 83-101). New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (1999). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus, [From individual case to specific type]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich
28. Kempton, W. (1993). Will public environmental concern lead to action on global warming?. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18, 217-245. doi: 10.1146/annurev.eg.18.110193.001245
29. Kesidou, S. (1990). Schülervorstellungen zur Irreversibilität, [Students' ideas about irreversibility]. Kiel: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel
30. Kiehl, J. T. & Trenberth, K. E. (1997). Earth's annual global mean energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(2), 197-208.
31. Kirkeby Hansen, P.J. (2010). Knowledge about the greenhouse effect and the effect of the ozone layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993, and 2005-What now?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 397-419. doi: 10.1080/09500690802600787
32. Klosterman, M.L., & Sadler, T.D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017-1043. doi: 10.1080/09500690902894512
33. Komorek, M., & Duit, R. (2004). The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 619-633. doi: 10.1080/09500690310001614717
34. Koulaidis, V., & Christidou, V. (1999). Models of students' thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications. Science Education, 83(5), 559-576. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<559::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-E
35. Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
36. Löfstedt, R.E. (1992). Lay perspectives concerning global climate change in Sweden. Energy and Environment, 3, 161-175.
37. Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis. Research instrument or mode of interpretation?. In M. Kiegelmann (Ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology, (pp. 139-148). Tübingen: Huber.
38. Mayring, P. (2007). On generalization in qualitatively oriented research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), Art. 26. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0703262.
39. Niebert, K. (2010). Den Klimawandel verstehen. Eine didaktische Rekonstruktion der globalen Erwärmung [Understanding climate change. An educational reconstruction of global warming]. Beiträge zur Didaktischen Rekonstruktion, 31. Oldenburg: Didaktisches Zentrum, Carl von Ossietzky Universität.
40. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1983). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflicts and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-300. doi: 10.1007/BF00414279
41. Österlind, K. (2005). Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds' work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 891-908. doi: 10.1080/09500690500038264
42. Piaget, J. (1968). Six Psychological Studies [Translated by Anita Tenzer]. New York: Vintage Books.
43. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207
44. Read, D., Bostrum, A., Morgan, M., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 971-982. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x
45. Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Rottermann, B. (2012). Improving students' conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect using theory-based learning materials that promote deep learning. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21, 95-119. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2012.672685
46. Reinfried, S., Schuler, S., Aeschbacher, U., & Huber, E. (2008). Der Treibhauseffekt-Folge eines Lochs in der Atmosphäre? Wie Schüler sich ihre Alltagsvorstellungen bewusst machen und sie verändern können [The greenhouse effect-result of a hole in the atmosphere? How students can become aware of their preconceptions and change them]. Geographie heute, 265/266, 24-33.
47. Rumelhart, D.E., & Norman, D.A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J.U. Cotton & R.L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic facts in cognition, (pp. 37-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Rye, J., Rubba, P., & Wiesenmayer, R. (1997). An investigation of middle school students' alternative conceptions of global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 527-551. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190503
49. Schnotz, W. (1995). Wissenserwerb mit Diagrammen und Texten. In L.J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Information Lernen mit Multimedia, [Learning with multimedia] (pp. 85-104). Weinheim: Beltz
50. Schönwiese, C.-D. (2003). Klimatologie, [Climatology] (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Ulmer (UTB)
51. Schuler, S. (2011). Alltagstheorien zu den Ursachen und Folgen des globalen Klimawandels. Erhebungen und Analyse von Schülervorstellungen aus geographiedidaktischer Perspektive [Personal theories about the reasons and consequences of global climate change. Analysis of students' conceptions from the perspective of geographical education]. BGAS 78. Bochum: Europäischer Universitätsverlag/Bochumer Universitätsverlag.
52. Seel, N. (1991). Weltwissen und mentale Modelle, [World views and mental models]. Göttingen: Hogrefe
53. Seel, N. (2003). Psychologie des Lernens, [Psychology of learning]. München, Basel: E. Reinhard Verlag
54. Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie, [General model theory]. Wien: Springer
55. Steffe, L.P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak & M. Suydam (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international congress on mathematical education, (pp. 469-471). Boston: Birkhäuser.
56. Steffe, L.P., Thompson, P.W., von Glasersfeld, E. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Strike, K.A., & Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl (Ed.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice, (pp. 147-176). New York, NY: State University NY Press.
58. Van Dijk, E.M., & Kattmann, U. (2010). Evolution im Unterricht: Eine Studie über fachdidaktisches Wissen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrer [Evolution education: A study of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge]. Zeitschrift für die Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 7-21.
59. Venville, G.J., & Treagust, D.F. (1996). The role of analogies in prompting conceptual change in biology. Instructional Science, 24(4), 295-320. doi: 10.1007/BF00118053
60. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143-178.
61. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
62. Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, (pp. 3-34). New York, NY: Routledge.
63. Weischet, W., & Endlicher, W. (2008). Einführung in die Allgemeine Klimatologie, [Introducation into general climatology] (7nd ed.). Berlin, Stuttgart: Gebr. Borntraeger
64. Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2001). Untersuchungen zur Mikrostruktur des analogischen Denkens in Teaching Experiments. In von AufschnaiterS. & M. Welzel (Eds.), Nutzung von Videodaten zur Untersuchung von Lehr-Lern-Prozessen, [Using video data to investigate teaching and learning processes] (pp. 143-156). Münster, NY: Waxmann
65. Wiser, M. (1986). The differentiation of heat and temperature: An evaluation of the effect of microcomputer teaching on students' misconceptions (Technical Report). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
66. Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). 'Is heat hot?' Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 331-355. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0