The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 619-633

  Komorek, Michael ^a   Duit, Reinders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642541813     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690310001614717     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BÜCKER, N. (1997) Experimente zum fraktalen Wachstum [Experiments on fractal growth]. Hausarbeit im Rahmen der ersten er ersten, Staatsprüfung zum Lehramt an Gymnasien (Kiel: IPN).
2. BUNDE, A. and HAVLIN, S. (1994) Fractals in Science (Berlin: Springer).
3. DUIT, R. and KOMOREK, M. (1997) Understanding the basic ideas of chaos-theory in a study of limited predictability, International Journal of Science Education, 19, 247-264.
4. DUIT, R., GOLDBERG, F. and NIEDDERER, H. (eds.) (1992) Research in physics learning: theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Bremen, Germany, 4-8 March (Kiel: IPN).
5. DUIT, R., KOMOREK, M. and WILBERS, J. (1997) Studies on educational reconstruction of chaos theory. Research in Science Education, 27, 339-357.
6. DUIT, R., ROTH,W.-M., KOMOREK,M. and WILBERS, J. (1998) Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: Towards an integrative perspective on learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1059-1073.
7. DUIT, R., ROTH, W-M., KOMOREK, M. and WILBERS, J. (2001) Fostering conceptual change by analogies - between Scylla and Charybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11, 283-303.
8. FENSHAM, P. J. (2001) Science content as problematic - issues for research. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross and P. Reiska (eds.) Reserch in Science Education - Past, Pesent, and Future (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 27-42.
9. FETTERMAN, D. M. (ed.) (1988) Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education (New York: Praeger).
10. GUBA, E. and LINCOLN, Y. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
11. JUNG, W. (1992) Probing acceptance, a technique for investigating learning difficulties. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer (eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (Kiel: IPN), 278-295.
12. KATSCHER, T., KOMOREK, M. and DUIT, R. (1996) Didaktische Untersuchungen zum Fraktalbegriff [Educational research on the concept of fractal]. In H. Behrendt (ed.) Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie, Vortrag̈e der GDCP-Tagung, Dresden, 1995 (Alsbach: Leuchtturm), 258-260.
13. KATTMANN, U., DUIT, R., GROPENGIEßBER, H. and KOMOREK, M. (1995) Educational reconstruction - bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students' conceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St Louis, MO, April.
14. KATTMANN, U., DUIT, R., GROPENGIEßBER, H. and KOMOREK, M. (1997) Das Modell der didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Ein Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung [The model of educational reconstruction. A model for science education research and development]. Zeuschrift fur Didaktik der Natumissenschaften, 3(3), 3-18.
15. KATU, N., LUNETTA, V. N. and VAN DEN BERG, E. (1993) Teaching experiment methodology. Paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY.
16. KLAFKI, W. (1969) Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbcreitung [Educational analysis as a core of constructing of instructions], In H. Roth and A. Blumental (eds.) Auswahl, Didaktische Analyse (Hannover: Schroedel), 5-34.
17. KOMOREK, M. (1999) Lernprozessstudic zum deterministischen Chaos [Learning process study in the field of deterministic chaos]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 5(3), 3-22.
18. KOMOREK, M., DUIT, R., BÜCKER, N. and NAUJACK, B. (2001) Learning process studies in the field of fractals. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross and P. Reiska (eds.) Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 95-100.
19. KOMOREK, M., WENDORFF, L. and DUIT, R. (2002) Expertenbefragung zum Bildungswert der nichrlinearen Physik [Views of experts on the educational potential of nonlinear physics]. Zeitschrift für dte Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 8, 33-51.
20. KONIG, R. (1974) Das Intervim-Form-Technik-Auswenung [Interview-Characteristics-Technics-Evaluation] (Köln: Ardey).
21. KROHN, D. (1998) Theorie und Praxis des Sokratischen Gesprächs [Theorie and practice of the socratic dialogue]. In K.R. Luhmann and T. Schmidt (eds.)Akademische Philosophie zwischen Anspruch und Erwartungen (Frankfurt am Main.: Suhrkamp), 119-132.
22. LAVE, J. (1991) Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine and S. D. Teasley (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 63-82.
23. MANDELBROT, B. B. (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature (New York: Freeman).
24. MARTIENSSEN, W. and KRÜGER, U. (1991) Nichtlineare Dynamik [Nonlinear Dynamics] (Frankfurt: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitä).
25. MAYRING, P. (1990) Qualitative Inhultsanalyse [Qualitative Analysis of Content] (Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag).
26. NAUJACK, B. (1997) Empirische Untersuchungen zum Unterricht über den Fraktalbegriff [Empirical investigations on teaching the fractal concept]. Hausarbeit im Rahmen der ersten Staatsprüfung zum Lehramt an Gymnasien (Kiel: IPN).
27. NORDMEIER, V. (1998) Fraktale in der Physik - Einfache Experimente für den Physikunterricht [Fractals in physics - simple experiments for physics education). In M. Komorek et al. (eds.) Fraktale im Unterricht [Fractals in the Classroom] (Kiel: IPN).
28. PARISI, J., MÜLLER, S. and ZIMMERMANN, W. (eds.) (1996) Nonlinear Physics of Complex Systems (Berlin: Springer).
29. PIAGET, J. (1969. The Child's Conception of Physical Causality (Totowa, NJ: Littlefield) (Original work published 1927).
30. ROTH, M., DUIT, R., KOMOREK, M. and WILBERS, J. (1997) Knowing and learning in real time: a phenomenological view of cognition during student-centered physics activities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL, March.
31. SCHLICHTING, H.-J. (1993) Fraktales Wachstum am Beispiel der fingerartiger Durchdringung zweier Flüssigkeiten [Fractal growth in the case of finger-like penetration of fluids). Physik in der Schule, 31(3), 113-117.
32. SCHUSTER, H.-G. (1994) Deterministic Chaos (Weinheim: Physik Verlag).
33. STEFFE, L. P. (1983) Tbe teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In M. Zwerg et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (Bosten: Birkhaüser), 469-471.
34. STEFFE, L. P. and D'AMBROSIO, B. (1996) Using teaching experiments to understand students' mathematics. In D. Treagust, R. Duit and B. Fraser (eds.) Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics (NewYork: Teacher College Press), 65-76.
35. VERGIN, L. N. (2000) Introduction to Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics (Cambridge: University Press).
36. VOSNIADOU, S. and IOANNIDES, C. (1998) From conceptual change to science education: a psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1213-1230.
37. WHITE, R. and GUNSTONE, R. (1992) Probing Understanding (London: Falmer Press).
38. WILBERS, J. and DUIT, R. (2001) On the micro-structure of analogical reasoning: the case of understanding chaotic systems. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross and P. Reiska (eds.) Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (Dordrecht: Kluwcr Academic Publishers), 205-210.
39. WITTEN, T. A. and SANDER, L. M. (1981) Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon. Physical Review Letters, 47(19), 1400-1403.