Invasive species: The categorization of wildlife in science, policy, and wildlife management

Land Use Policy

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 204-212

  Boonman Berson, Susan ^a   Turnhout, Esther ^a   van Tatenhove, Jan ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Constructions; Invasive species; Policy; Science; Wildlife; Wildlife management

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INVASIVE SPECIES; POLICY APPROACH; SPECIES CONSERVATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84889583514     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Arts K., Fischer A., Van der Wal R. Common stories of reintroduction: a discourse analysis of documents supporting animal reintroductions to Scotland. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:911-920.
2. Bonesi L., Palazon S. The American mink in Europe: status, impacts, and control. Biological Conservation 2007, 134:470-483.
3. Bowker G.C. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 2000, 30:643-683.
4. Bowker G.C., Star S.L. Sorting Things Out, Classification and Its Consequences 2000, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 377 pp.
5. Bremner A., Park K. Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biological Conservation 2007, 139:306-314.
6. Campbell B. Animals behaving badly. Natural Enemies: People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective 2000, 124-144. J. Knight (Ed.).
7. Caplat P., Coutts S.R. Integrating ecological knowledge, public perception and urgency of action into invasive species management. Environmental Management 2011, 48:878-881.
8. Chapron G., Wielgus R., Quenette P.-Y., Camarra J.-J. Diagnosing mechanisms of decline and planning for recovery of an endangered brown bear (Ursus arctos) population. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(10):1-7.
9. Chapron G., Quenette P.-Y., Legendre S., Clobert J. Which future for the French Pyrenean brown bear (Ursus arctos) population? An approach using stage-structured deterministic and stochastic models. Comptes Rendus Biologies 2003, 326:S174-S182.
10. Clavero M., García-Berthou E. Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 20:110.
11. Cohen A.N., Carlton J.T. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 1998, 279:555-558.
12. Colautti R.I., MacIsaac H.J. A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Diversity and Distributions 2004, 10:135-141.
13. Colautti R.I., Richardson D.M. Subjectivity and flexibility in invasion terminology: too much of a good thing?. Biological Invasions 2009, 11:1225-1229.
14. Cowie R.H. Patterns of introduction of non-indigenous non-marine snails and slugs in the Hawaiian Islands. Biodiversity and Conservation 1998, 7:349-368.
15. Davis M.A., Chew M.K., Hobbs R.J., Lugo A.E., Ewel J.J., Vermeij G.J., Brown J.H., Rosenzweig M.L., Gardener M.R., Carroll S.P., Thompson K., Pickett S.T.A., Stromberg J.C., Del Tredici P., Suding K.N., Ehrenfeld J.G., Grime J.P., Mascaro J., Briggs J.C. Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 2011, 474:153-154.
16. Davis M.A., Thompson K. Eight ways to be a colonizer: two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for Invasion Ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 2000, 81(3):226-230.
17. Davis M.A., Thompson K. Invasion terminology: should ecologists define their terms differently than others? No, not if we want to be of any help!. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 2001, 82(3):206.
18. Daehler C.C. Two ways to be an invader, but one is more suitable for ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 2001, 82(1):101-102.
19. Dean J. Controversy over classification: a case study from the history of botany. Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture 1979, 211-230. Sage, London. B. Barnes, S. Shapin (Eds.).
20. Deberdt A.J., Scherer S.B. The wild boar: occurrence and management of the species in Brazil. Natureza & Consevacão 2007, 5(2):101-114.
21. Decaluwe F., Quenette P.-Y. Brown Bear Conservation in France: four years after the translocation of five bears from Slovenia. International Bear News 2009, 18(4):8-10.
22. Elton C.S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants 1958, Methuen, London, UK, 196 pp.
23. Evans J.M., Wilkie A.C., Burkhardt J. Adaptive management of non-native species: moving beyond the either-or through experimental pluralism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2008, 21:521-539.
24. Farquharson B., Kelly J., Welsh P., Mazur K., Bennett J. Policy responses to invasive native species: issues of social and private benefits and costs. Contributed Paper for the 53rd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. 2009.
25. Fritts S.H., Bangs E.E., Fontaine J.A., Johnson M.R., Phillips M.K., Koch E.D., Gunson J.R. Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho. Restoration Ecology 1997, 5(1):7-27.
26. Garrott R.A., Gude J.A., Bergman E.J., Gower C., White P.J., Hamlin K.L. Generalizing wolf effects across the Greater Yellowstone Area: a cautionary note. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005, 33(4):1245-1255.
27. Geertz C. Notes on the Balinese Cockfight. The Interpretation of Cultures: selected essays 1973, 412-453. Basic Books, New York. C. Geertz (Ed.).
28. Genovesi P., Shine C. European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Nature and Environment 137 2004, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg Cedex, 68 pp.
29. Gieryn T.F. Boundary work and the demarcation of science form non-science, strains and interests in professional interests of scientists. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:781-795.
30. Head L., Muir P. Nativeness, invasiveness, and nation in Australian plants. Geographical Review 2004, 94(2):199-217.
31. Heger T., Saul W.-C., Trepl L. What biological invasions 'are' is a matter of perspective. Journal for Nature Conservation 2013, 21:93-96.
32. Hettinger N. Exotic species, naturalisation, and biological nativism. Environmental Values 2001, 10:193-224.
33. Hinchliffe S., Kearnes M.B., Degen M., Whatmore S. Urban wild things: a cosmopoliticial experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2005, 23:643-658.
34. Hinchliffe S. Geographies of Nature; Societies, Environments, Ecologies 2007, Sage Publications Ltd, London, 212 pp.
35. Ingold T. Towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation and Society 2005, 3(2):501-508.
36. Jones R. Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 2009, 33:174-189.
37. Jerolmack C. How pigeons became rats: the cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Social Problems 2008, 55(1):72-94.
38. Larson B.M.H. The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2005, 3(9):495-500.
39. Larson B.M.H., Nerlich B., Wallis P. Metaphors and biorisks: the war on infectious diseases and invasive species. Science Communication 2005, 26(3):243-268.
40. Larson B.M.H. An alien approach to invasive species: objectivity and society in invasion biology. Biological Invasions 2007, 9:947-956.
41. Larson B.M.H. Who's invading what? Systems thinking about invasive species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2007, 87:993-999.
42. Latour B. Pandora's Hope: Essay on the Reality of Science Studies 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 336 pp.
43. Lusher A. Brown bears reprieved in French Pyrenees. The Electronic Telegraph 2000, 27 August.
44. Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M., Bazzaz F.A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 2000, 10:689-710.
45. Morris C. Networks of agri-environmental policy implementation: a case study of England's Countryside Stewardship Scheme. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:177-191.
46. National Invasive Species Council 2008-2012 National Invasive Species Management Plan 2008, Washington DC, USA, 35 pp.
47. O'Brien W. Exotic invasions, nativism, and ecological restoration: on the persistence of a contentious debate. Ethics, Place & Environment 2006, 9(1):63-77.
48. Oregon Invasive Species Council, 2013. http://www.oregon.gov/.
49. O'Rourke E., Kramm N., Chisholm N. The influence of farming styles on the management of the Iveragh uplands, southwest Ireland. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:805-816.
50. Payésa A.C.L.M., Pavãob T., Ferreira dos Santosa R. The conservation success over time: evaluating the land use and cover change in a protected area under a long re-categorization process. Land Use Policy 2013, 30:177-185.
51. Peretti J.H. Nativism and nature: rethinking biological invasions. Environmental Values 1998, 7:183-192.
52. Porter M.P. Trust in Numbers; the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life 1995, Princeton university press, Princeton, NJ, 324 pp.
53. Ricciardi A. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasion meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes?. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2001, 58:2513-2525.
54. Richardson D.M., Pysek P., Rejmanek M., Barbour M.G., Panetta F.D., West C.J. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 2000, 6:93-107.
55. Robbins P. Comparing invasive networks: cultural and political biographies of invasive species. American Review 2004, 94(2):139-156.
56. Rouhe A., Sytsma M. Feral Swine Action Plan for Oregon 2007, 28. Portland State University Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Environmental Science & Resources.
57. Sagoff M. Do non-native species threaten the natural environment?. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2005, 18:215-236.
58. Schüttler E., Rozzib R., Jax K. Towards a societal discourse on invasive species management: a case study of public perceptions of mink and beavers in Cape Horn. Journal for Nature Conservation 2011, 19:175-184.
59. Schüttler E., Klenke R., McGehee S., Rozzi R., Jax K. Vulnerability of ground-nesting waterbirds to predation by invasive American mink in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1450-1460.
60. Selman P. Conservation designations - are they fit for purpose in the 21st century?. Land Use Policy 2009, 26S:S142-S153.
61. Simberloff D. Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia?. Biological Invasions 2003, 5:179-192.
62. Simberloff D. Non-native species DO threaten the natural environment!. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2005, 18:595-607.
63. Smith M. French Pyrenees: bad news bears. Telegraph.co.uk 7:00AM BST 14 May 2009 2009.
64. Smith D.W., Peterson R.O., Houston D.B. Yellowstone after wolves. Bioscience 2003, 53(4):330-340.
65. Smoky Mountain Mall Wild Hogs in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park 2012, http://www.smokymtnmall.com/mall/wildhogs.shtml.
66. Soini K., Aakkula J. Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: the essence of local conceptions and constructions. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:311-321.
67. Subramaniam B. The aliens have landed! Reflections on the rhetoric of biological invasions. Making Threats: Biofears and Environmental Anxieties 2005, 135-148. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD. B.S. Hartmann, B. Subramaniam, C. Zerner (Eds.).
68. The White House Executive Order 13112, invasive species. 13112 Ed F Register 1999, The White House, Washington, 4 pp.
69. Turnhout E. The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators. Science and Public Policy 2009, 36:403-412.
70. Turnhout E., Boonman-Berson S. Databases, scaling practices and the globalization of biodiversity. Ecology and Society 2011, 16(1):art35.
71. Turnhout E., Waterton C., Neves K., Buizer M. Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to "living with". Conservation Letters 2013, 6:154-161.
72. Valéry L., Fritz H., Lefeuvre J.-C. Another call for the end of invasion biology. Oikos 2013, 122:1143-1146.
73. Valéry L., Fritz H., Lefeuvre J.-C., Simberloff D. In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biological Invasions 2008, 10:1345-1351.
74. Valéry L., Fritz H., Lefeuvre J.-C., Simberloff D. Invasive species can also be native. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009, 24:585.
75. Verburg G. Beleidsnota Invasieve exoten 2007, N e V Minsterie van landbouw, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 7 pp.
76. VPRO Allochtone beren in de Pyreneeën. De slag om Brussel 2010, 2:2.
77. Waterton C. From field to fantasy: classifying nature, constructing Europe. Social Studies of Science 2002, 32(2):177-204.
78. Weeks P., Packard J. Feral hogs: invasive species or nature's bounty?. Human Organization 2009, 68(3):280-292.
79. Zisenis M. EU DAISIE research project: wanted - death penalty to keep native species competitive?. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2012, 25:597-606.