Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Sridharan, Arati ^a   Rajan, Subramaniam D ^a   Muthuswamy, Jit ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRODE-TISSUE INTERFACE; FORCE-DISPLACEMENT CURVES; IMPLANT-TISSUE INTERFACES; PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION; VISCOELASTIC MODELING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; ELASTIC MODULI; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MICROELECTRODES; MODELS; VISCOELASTICITY;

TISSUE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN ELECTRODE INTERFACE; BRAIN TISSUE; FORCE; IMPLANTATION; MICROELECTRODE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STEADY STATE; VELOCITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; MICROELECTRODES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84889041378     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066001     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Biran R, Martin D C and Tresco P A 2007 The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 82 169-78 (Pubitemid 46906503)
2. Polikov V S, Tresco P A and Reichert W M 2005 Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes J. Neurosci. Methods 148 1-18 (Pubitemid 41423453)
3. Nicolelis M A L et al 2003 Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 11041-6 (Pubitemid 37140149)
4. Jackson N, Sridharan A, Anand S, Baker M, Okandan M and Muthuswamy J 2010 Long-term neural recordings using MEMS based movable microelectrodes in the brain Front Neuroeng. 3 10
5. Ward M P, Rajdev P, Ellison C and Irazoqui P P 2009 Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings Brain Res. 1282 183-200
6. Friere M A M et al 2011 Comprehensive analysis of tissue preservation and recording quality from chronic multielectrode implants PLoS One 6 e27554
7. Karumbaiah L, Saxena T, Carlson D, Patil K, Patkar R, Gaupp E A, Betancur M, Stanley G B, Carin L and Bellamkonda R V 2013 Relationship between intracortical electrode design and chronic recording function Biomaterials 34 8061-74
8. Prevost T P, Balkrishnan A, Suresh S and Socrate S 2011 Biomechanics of brain tissue Acta Biomater. 7 83-95
9. Prevost T P, Jin G, Moya M A d, Alam H B, Suresh S and Socrate S 2011 Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue in indentation in vivo, in situ, and in vitro Acta Biomater. 7 4090-101
10. Atay S M, Kroenke C D, Sabet A and Bayly P V 2008 Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography J. Biomech. Eng. 130 021013 (Pubitemid 351975659)
11. Cheng S, Clarke E C and Bilston L E 2008 Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: a review Med. Eng. Phys. 30 1318-37
12. van Dommelan J A W, van der Sande T P J, Hrapko M and Peters G W M 2010 Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: interregional variation J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 3 158-66
13. Howard M A, Abkes B A, Ollendieck M C, Noh M D, Ritter R C and Gillies G T 1999 Measurement of the force required to move a neurosurgical probe through in vivo human brain tissue IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 891-4 (Pubitemid 29304717)
14. Miller K 1999 Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures J. Biomech. 32 531-7 (Pubitemid 29199986)
15. Miller K 2005 Method of testing very soft biological tissues in compression J. Biomech. 38 153-8 (Pubitemid 39429471)
16. Schiavone P, Chassat F, Boudou T, Promayon E, Valdivia F and Payan Y 2009 In vivo measurement of human brain elasticity using a light aspiration device Med. Image Anal. 13 673-8
17. Taylor Z and Miller K 2004 Reassessment of brain elasticity for analysis of biomechanism of hydrocephalus J. Biomech. 37 1263-9 (Pubitemid 38798381)
18. Walsh E K, Furniss W W and Schettini A 1977 On measurement of brain elastic response in vivo Am. J. Physiol. 232 R27-30
19. Sharp A A, Ortega A M, Restrepo D, Curran-Everett D and Gall K 2009 In vivo penetration mechanics and mechanical properties of mouse brain tissue at micrometer scales IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56 45-53
20. Guillaume A, Osmont D, Gaffie D, Sarron J C and Quandieu P 1997 Effects of perfusion on the mechanical behavior of the brain exposed to hypergravity J. Biomech. 30 383-9 (Pubitemid 27117168)
21. Estes M S and McElhaney J H 1970 Response of brain tissue of compressive loading ASME Paper no.: 70-BNF-13
22. Chatelin S, Constantinesco A and Willinger R 2010 Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: from in vitro to in vivo investigations Biorheology 47 255-76
23. Mendis K K, Stalnaker R L and Advani S H 1970 A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue J. Biomech. Eng. 117 279-85
24. Miller K and Chinzei K 1997 Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory J. Biomech. 30 1115-21 (Pubitemid 28026501)
25. Bilston L E 2011 Neural tissue biomechanics Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering, and Biomaterials 3 ed A Gefen (New York: Springer)
26. Shafieian M, Darvish K K and Stone J R 2009 Changes to the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue after traumatic axonal injury J. Biomech. 42 2136-42
27. Pervin F and Chen W W 2011 Effect of inter-species, gender, and breeding on the mechanical behavior of brain tissue NeuroImage 54 S98-102
28. Gefen A G N, Zhu Q, Raghupathi R and Margulies S S 2003 Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat J. Neurotrauma 20 1163-77 (Pubitemid 37467280)
29. Sack I et al 2009 The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity NeuroImage 46 652-7
30. Shulyakov A V, Cenkowski S S, Buist R J and Del Bigio M R 2011 Age-dependence of intracranial viscoelastic properties in living rats J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4 484-97
31. Streitberger K-J et al 2011 In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus NMR Biomed. 24 385-92
32. Prange M and Margulies S 2002 Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of brain undergoing large deformation J. Biomech. Eng. 124 244-52 (Pubitemid 34407069)
33. Walsh E K and Schetinni A 1976 Elastic behavior of brain tissue in vivo Am. J. Physiol. 230 1058-62
34. Najafi K and Hetke J F 1990 Strength characterization of silicon microprobes in neurophysiological tissues IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 474-81 (Pubitemid 20238329)
35. Hosseini N H, Hoffmann R, Kisban S, Stieglitz T, Paul O and Ruther P 2007 Comparative study on the insertion behavior of cerebral microprobes Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS (Lyon, France, 23-26 August 2007) pp 4711-4
36. Welkenhuysen M, Andrei A, Ameye L, Eberel W and Nuttin B 2011 Effect of insertion speed on tissue response and insertion mechanics of a chronically implanted silicon-based neural probe IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 3250-9
37. Paralikar K J and Clement R S 2008 Collagenase-aided intracortical microelectrode array insertion: effects on insertion force and recording performance IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 2258-67
38. Bjornsson C S et al 2006 Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion J. Neural Eng. 3 196-207 (Pubitemid 44262020)
39. Jensen W, Yoshida K and Hofmann U G 2006 In-vivo implant mechanics of flexible, silicon-based ACREO microelectrode arrays in rat cerebral cortex IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 934-40 (Pubitemid 43667752)
40. Wittek A et al 2008 Subject-specific non-linear biomechanical model of needle insertion into brain Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 11 135-46
41. McConnell G C, Schneider T M, Owens D J and Bellamkonda R V 2007 Extraction force and cortical tissue reaction of silicon microelectrode arrays implanted in the rat brain IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 1097-107 (Pubitemid 46815118)
42. Gefen A and Margulies S S 2004 Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J. Biomech. 37 1339-52 (Pubitemid 38953243)
43. Subbaroyan J, Martin D C and Kipke D R 2005 A finite-element model of the mechanical effects of implantable microelectrodes in the cerebral cortex J. Neural Eng. 2 103-13 (Pubitemid 41740528)
44. Miller K (ed) 2011 Biomechanics of the Brain (New York: Springer)
45. Prevost J H 1985 A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 4 9-17
46. Lee H, Bellamkonda R V, Sun W and Levenston M E 2005 Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain J. Neural Eng. 2 81-9 (Pubitemid 41740525)
47. Briscoe B J, Sebastian K S and Adams M J 1994 The effect of indenter geometry on the elastic response to indentation J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 27 1156-62
48. Stice P and Muthuswamy J 2009 Assessment of gliosis around moveable implants in the brain J. Neural Eng. 6 046004
49. Williams J C, Hippensteel J A, Dilgen J, Shain W and Kipke D R 2007 Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants J. Neural Eng. 4 410-23 (Pubitemid 350242918)
50. McConnell G C, Butera R J and Bellamkonda R V 2009 Bioimpedance modeling to monitor astrocytic response to chronically implanted electrodes J. Neural Eng. 6 055005
51. Williams J C, Rennaker R L and Kipke D R 1999 Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex Brain Res. Protoc. 4 303-13
52. Potter K A, Buck A C, Self W K and Capadona J R 2012 Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses J. Neural Eng. 9 046020
53. Solon J, Leventhal L, Sengupta K, Georges P C and Janmey P A 2007 Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates Biophys. J. 93 4453-61 (Pubitemid 350294491)
54. Moshayedi P et al 2010 Mechanosensitivity of astrocytes on optimized polyacrylamide gels analyzed by quantitative morphometry J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22 194114
55. Bundesen L Q, Scheel T A, Bregman B S and Kromer I F 2003 Ephrin-B2 and EphB2 regulation of astrocyte-meningeal fibroblast interactions in response to spinal cord lesions in adult rats J. Neurosci. 23 7789-800 (Pubitemid 37052347)
56. Bernick K B, Prevost T P, Suresh S and Socrate S 2011 Biomechanics of single cortical neurons Acta Biomater. 7 1210-9
57. Georges P C, Miller W J, Meaney D F, Sawyer E S and Janmey P A 2006 Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures Biophys. J. 90 3012-8
58. McConnell G C, Rees H D, Levey A I, Gutekunst C-A, Gross R E and Bellamkonda R V 2009 Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration J. Neural Eng. 6 056003
59. Karumbaiah L et al 2012 The upregulation of specific interleukin (IL) receptor antagonists and paradoxical enhancement of neuronal apoptosis due to electrode induced strain and brain micromotion Biomaterials 33 5983-96
60. Harris J P et al 2011 In vivo deployment of mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for intracortical microelectrodes J. Neural Eng. 8 046010
61. Capadona J R, Shanmuganathan K, Tyler D J, Rowan S J and Weder C 2008 Stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by sea cucumber dermis Science 319 1370-4 (Pubitemid 351354868)
62. Capadona J R, Tyler D J, Zorman C A, Rowan S J and Weder C 2012 Mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for neural interfacing MRS Bull. 37 581-9
63. Meng F, Hlady V and Tresco P A 2012 Inducing alignment in astrocyte tissue constructs by surface ligands patterned on biomaterials Biomaterials 33 1323-35
64. Wolchok J C and Tresco P A 2010 The isolation of cell derived extracellular matrix constructs using sacrificial open-cell foams Biomaterials 31 9595-603