Habitat preferences and conservation of the marbled jewel beetle Poecilonota variolosa (Buprestidae)

Journal of Insect Conservation

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1145-1154

  Åström, Maria ^a   Pettersson, Lars B ^a   Öckinger, Erik ^b   Hedin, Jonas ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c Unit of Nature Conservation   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aspen; Bark thickness; Biotope; Coleoptera; Forest management; Populus tremula; Sun exposure

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOTOPE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT TYPE; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RED LIST; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY;

SWEDEN;

BUPRESTIDAE; COLEOPTERA; POPULUS; POPULUS TREMULA;

EID: 84888844417     PISSN: 1366638X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-013-9595-3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ahnström J, Winqvist JC, Björklund L, Hallgren L (2010) To cut or not to cut-that is the question for Swedish pasture managers. Aspects Appl Biol 100: 295-302.
2. BAFU (2011) Liste der National Prioritären Arten. Arten mit nationaler Priorität für die Erhaltung und Förderung, Stand 2010. Umwelt-Vollzug Nr. 1103. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern [In German with English summary].
3. Berg Å, Ehnström B, Gustafsson L, Hallingbäck T, Jonsell M, Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal and fungi species in Swedish forests-distribution and habitat associations. Conserv Biol 8: 718-731.
4. Bílý S (1982) Fauna Entomologica Scandinavia vol. 10. The Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Scandinavian Science Press LTD, Klampenborg.
5. Binot M, Bless R, Boye P, Gruttke H, Pretscher P (1998) Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz, Heft 55, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg [In German].
6. Blažytė-Čereškienė L, Karalius V (2012) Habitat requirements of the endangered beetle Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796) (Coleoptera, Boridae). Insect Conserv Divers 5: 186-191.
7. Blom S (ed) (2010) Nya regler kring träd och buskar i betesmarker-hur påverkas miljön genom förändrade röjningar? Rapport 2010: 8, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping [In Swedish with English summary].
8. Bouget C (2005) Short-term effect of windstorm disturbance on saproxylic beetles in broadleaved temperate forests. Part 1: do environmental changes induce a gap effect? For Ecol Manag 216: 1-14.
9. Bradshaw RHW, Lindbladh M, Hannon GE (2010) The role of fire in southern Scandinavian forests during late Holocene. Int J Wildland Fire 19: 1040-1049.
10. Brown N, Jennings S, Wheeler P, Nabe-Nielsen J (2000) An improved method for rapid assessment of forest understorey light environments. J Appl Ecol 37: 1044-1053.
11. Bundeskanzleramt Österrich (2005) NÖ Artenschutzverordnung 5500/2-0. Available at: [http://www. ris. bka. gv. at]. Downloaded 5 July 2013.
12. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63: 215-244.
13. Dulaurent AM, Porté AJ, van Halder I, Vétillard F, Menassieu P, Jactel H (2011) A case of habitat complementation in forest pests: Pine processionary moth pupae survive better in open areas. For Ecol Manag 261: 1069-1076.
14. Edenius L, Ericsson G (2007) Aspen demographics in relation to spatial context and ungulate browsing: implications for conservation and forest management. Biol Conserv 135: 293-301.
15. Edenius L, Ericsson G, Kempe G, Bergström R, Danell K (2011) The effects of changing land use and browsing on aspen abundance and regeneration: a 50-year perspective from Sweden. J Appl Ecol 48: 301-309.
16. Ehnström B, Axelsson R (2002) Insektsgnag i bark och ved. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala [In Swedish with English summary].
17. Ericsson G, Edenius L, Sundström D (2001) Factors affecting browsing by moose (Alces alces L.) on European aspen (Populus tremula L.) in a managed boreal landscape. Ecoscience 8: 344-349.
18. Farkač J, Král D, Škorpík M (eds) (2005) List of threatened species in the Czech Republic, Invertebrates. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha.
19. Furlan L (1998) The biology of Agriotes ustulatus Schäller (Col, Elateridae). II. Larval development, pupation, whole cycle description and practical implications. J Appl Entomol 122: 71-78.
20. Gärdenfors U (ed) (2010) The 2010 Red List of Swedish species. Artdatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
21. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) (2012) Species: Poecilonota variolosa. Available at http://data. gbif. org. Downloaded 17 Dec 2012.
22. Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 1-23.
23. Gustafsson L (2000) En skogshistorisk jämförelse mellan två närbelägna landskap med olika mångfald i östra Småland. Honours thesis, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU [In Swedish with English summary].
24. Gutowski JM, Miłkowski M (2008) Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of the Kozienicka Forest. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 27: 49-85 [In Polish with English summary].
25. Hansen EM, Bentz BJ, Turner DL (2001) Physiological basis for flexible voltinism in the spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 133: 805-817.
26. Hanski I (2011) Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40: 248-255.
27. Hedin J, Ranius T, Nilsson SG, Smith HG (2008) Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry. Biodivers Conserv 17: 675-684.
28. Hjältén J, Johansson J, Alinvi O, Danell K, Ball JP, Pettersson R, Gibb H, Hilszczanski J (2007) The importance of substrate type, shading and scorching for the attractiveness of dead wood for saproxylic beetles. Basic Appl Ecol 8: 364-376.
29. Hołyński RB (2006) Taxonomical, zoogeographical and phylogenetical relations among Indo-Pacific Dicerca Esch. and Poecilonota Esch. (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Munis Entomol Zool 1: 1-50.
30. Huxel GR, Hastings A (1999) Habitat loss, fragmentation and restoration. Restor Ecol 7: 309-315.
31. Hyvärinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P (2009) Prescribed fires and retention trees help to conserve beetle diversity in managed boreal forests despite their transient negative effects on some beetle groups. Insect Conserv Divers 2: 93-105.
32. Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers Conserv 7: 749-764.
33. Kolström M, Lumatjärvi J (2000) Saproxylic beetles on aspen in commercial forests: a simulation approach to species richness. Forest Ecol Manage 126: 113-120.
34. Kouki J, Arnold K, Martikainen P (2004) Long-term persistence of aspen-a host for many threatened species-is endangered in old-growth conservation areas in Finland. J Nat Conserv 12: 41-52.
35. Latva-Karjanmaa T, Suvanto L, Leinonen K, Hannu R (2006) Sexual reproduction of European aspen (Populus tremula L.) at prescribed burned site: the effects of moisture conditions. New For 31: 545-558.
36. Latva-Karjanmaa T, Penttila R, Siitonen J (2007) The demographic structure of European aspen (Populus tremula) populations in managed and old-growth boreal forests in eastern Finland. Can J For Res 37: 1070-1081.
37. Lindbladh M, Brunet J, Hannon G (2002) Forest history as a basis for ecosystem restoration-a multidisciplinary case study in a south Swedish temperate landscape. Restor Ecol 15: 284-295.
38. Lindbladh M, Niklasson M, Nilsson SG (2003) Long-time record of fire and open canopy in a high biodiversity forest in southeast Sweden. Biol Conserv 114: 231-243.
39. Linder P, Östlund L (1998) Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885-1996. Biol Conserv 85: 9-19.
40. Linder P, Elfving B, Zackrisson O (1997) Stand structure and successional trends in virgin boreal forest reserves in Sweden. For Ecol Manag 98: 17-23.
41. Lindhe A, Lindelöw A, Åsenblad N (2005) Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers Conserv 14: 3033-3053.
42. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (2006) SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
43. Myking T, Bøhler F, Austrhiem G, Solberg EJ (2011) Life-history strategies of aspen (Populus tremula L.) and browsing effects: a literature review. Forestry 84: 61-71.
44. Niemelä J (1997) Inverterbrates and boreal forest management. Conserv Biol 11: 601-610.
45. Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010) European Red List of saproxylic beetles. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
46. Nilsson SG, Baranowski R (1993) Skogshistorikens betydelse för artsammansättning av vedskalbaggar i urskogsartad blandskog. Entomol Tidskr 114: 133-146 [In Swedish with English abstract].
47. Nilsson SG, Baranowski R (1997) Habitat predictability and the occurrence of wood beetles in old-growth beech forests. Ecography 20: 491-498.
48. Palm T (1954) Anteckningar om svenska skalbaggar. IX. Entomol Tidskr 75: 13-28 [In Swedish].
49. Palm T (1959) Die holz- und rinder-käfer der süd- und mittelschwedischen laubbäume. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XVI. Entomologiska Sällskapet i Lund, Lund [In German with English summary].
50. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652-661.
51. Ranius T (2006) Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul Ecol 48: 177-188.
52. Rouquette JR, Thompson DJ (2005) Habitat associations of the endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale, in a water meadow ditch system in southern England. Biol Conserv 123: 225-235.
53. Shintani Y (2011) Quantitative short-day photoperiodic response in larva development and its adaptive significance in an adult-overwintering cerambycid beetle, Phytoecia rufiventris. J Insect Physiol 57: 1053-1059.
54. Shintani Y, Hirose Y, Terao M (2011) Effects of temperature, photoperiod and soil humidity on induction of pseudopupal diapause in the bean blister beetle Epicauta gorhami. Physiol Entomol 36: 14-20.
55. Sveaskog (2008) Ekoparksplan Hornsö. http://www. sveaskog. se/Documents/Skogsbruk%20och%20milj%c3%b6/Naturv%c3%a5rd/EkoparksplanHorns%c3%b6. pdf. Downloaded 10 Nov 2011 [In Swedish].
56. Svenning JC (2002) A review of natural vegetation openness in north-western Europe. Biol Conserv 104: 133-148.
57. Swedish Forest Agency (2011) Skogsstyrelsens författningssamling, SKSFS 2011: 7 [In Swedish].
58. Swedish Metrological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) (2011) STRÅNG - a mesoscale model for solar radiation.[http://strang. smhi. se/], downloaded 2011-Oct-03.
59. Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267: 139-145.
60. Tikkanen O-P, Martikainen P, Hyvärinen E, Junninen K, Kouki J (2006) Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland: associations with forest structure, tree species and decaying wood. Ann Zool Fenn 43: 373-383.
61. Travis JMJ, Dytham C (1999) Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266: 723-728.
62. Vehmas M, Kouki J, Eerikainen K (2009) Long-term spatio-temporal dynamics and historical continuity of European aspen (Populus tremula L.) stands in the Koli National Park, eastern Finland. Forestry 82: 135-148.
63. Vera FWM (2002) The dynamic European forest. Arboric J 26: 174-211.
64. Vodka S, Konvicka M, Cizek L (2009) Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management. J Insect Conserv 13: 553-562.
65. Wermelinger B, Flückiger P-F, Obrist M-K, Duelli P (2007) Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. J Appl Entomol 131: 104-114.
66. Zakrisson C, Ericsson G, Edenius L (2007) Effects of browsing on recruitment and mortality of European aspen (Populus tremula L.). Scand J For Res 22: 324-332.