Conspecific sperm precedence in two species of tropical sea urchins

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-105

  Geyer, Laura B ^a,b   Palumbi, Stephen R ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conspecific sperm precedence; Echinometra; Fertilization; Hybrid; Reproductive isolation; Sea urchin

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; ECHINODERM; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); HYBRID; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ECHINOIDEA; ECHINOMETRA; ECHINOMETRA OBLONGA; ECHINOMETRA SP.; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 13244299343     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00897.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Andersson, M., and Y. Iwasa. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:53-58.
2. 1 backcrosses between two closely related tropical species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 31:1-3.
3. Arakaki, Y., and T. Uehara. 1991. Physiological adaptations and reproduction of the four types of Echinometra mathaei (Blainville). Pp. 105-112 in T. Yanagisawa, I. Yasumasu, C. Oguro, N. Suzuki, and T. Motokawa, eds. Biology of Echinodermata. Balkema, Rotterdam.
4. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
5. Arnold, M. L., J. L. Hamrick, and B. D. Bennett. 1993. Interspecific pollen competition and reproductive isolation in Iris. J. Hered. 84:13-16.
6. Banks, M. A., D. J. McGoldrick, W. Borgeson, and D. Hedgecock. 1994. Gametic incompatibility and genetic divergence of Pacific and Kumamoto oysters, Crassostrea gigas and C. sikamea. Mar. Biol. 121:127-135.
7. Bernasconi, G., T. Ashman, T. Birkhead, J. Bishop, U. Grossniklaus, E. Kubli, D. Marshall, B. Schmid, I. Skogsmyr, R. Snook, D. Taylor, I. Till-Bottraud, P. Ward, D. Zeh, and B. Hellriegel. 2004. Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303:971-975.
8. Biermann, C. H. 1998. The molecular evolution of sperm bindin in six species of sea urchins (Echinoida: Strongylocentrotidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1761-1771.
9. Bierne, N., P. David, P. Boudry, and F. Bonhomme. 2002. Assortative fertilization and selection at larval stage in the mussels Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Evolution 56:292-298.
10. Brown, W. D. 1999. Mate choice in tree crickets and their kin. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44:371-396.
11. Buss, L. W., and P. O. Yund. 1989. A sibling species group of hydractinia in the northeastern United States. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 69:857-874.
12. Byrne, M., and M. J. Anderson. 1994. Hybridization of sympatric Patiriella species (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in New South Wales. Evolution 48:564-576.
13. Cameron, R. A. 1984. Two species of Lytechinus (Toxopneustidae: Echinoidea: Echinodermata) are completely cross-fertile. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 83:154-157.
14. Carney, S. E., S. A. Hodges, M. L. Arnold. 1996. Effects of differential pollen-tube growth on hybridization in the Louisiana irises. Evolution 50:1871-1878.
15. Carr, J., and G. Shearer, Jr. 1998. Genome size, complexity, and ploidy of the pathogenic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum. J. Bacteriol. 180:6697-6703.
16. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Murray, London.
17. Davis, H. C. 1950. On interspecific hybridization in Ostrea. Science 111:522.
18. Denny, M. W., and M. F. Shibata. 1989. Consequences of surf-zone turbulence for settlement and external fertilization. Am. Nat. 134:859-889.
19. Dixon, S. M., J. A. Coyne, and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The evolution of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Mol. Ecol. 12:1179-1184.
20. Durham, J. W., C. D. Wagner, and D. P. Abbott. 1980. Echinoidea: the sea urchins. Pp. 163 in R. H. Morris, D. Abbott, and E. C. Haderlie, eds. Intertidal invertebrates of California. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
21. Eberhard, W. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Evans, J. P., L. Zane, S. Francescato, and A. Pilastro. 2003. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421:360-363.
23. Fagoonee, S., A. Pultoo, I. Fagoonee, and G. Khittoo. 2000. Morphological and hybridization studies to investigate whether the three Mauritian sea urchins are separate species. Indian Biol. 32:5-9.
24. Fedina, T. Y., and S. M. Lewis. 2004. Female influence over offspring paternity in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:1393-1399.
25. Fleming, I. A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6:379-416.
26. Galtsoff, P. S., and R. O. Smith. 1932. Stimulation of spawning and cross-fertilization between American and Japanese oysters. Science 76:371-372.
27. Geyer, L. B., and S. R. Palumbi. 2003. Reproductive character displacement and the genetics of gamete recognition in tropical sea urchins. Evolution 57:1049-1060.
28. Grant, C. M., S. H. Hooker, R. C. Babcock, and R. G. Creese. 1998. Synchronous spawning and reproductive incompatibility of two bivalve species: Paphies subtriangulata and Paphies australis. Veliger 41:148-156.
29. Hagman, D. K., and P. D. Vize. 2003. Mass spawning by two brittle star species, Ophioderma rubicundum and O. squamosissimum (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), at the Flower Garden Banks, Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 72:871-876.
30. Hatta, M., H. Fukami, W. Wang, M. Omori, K. Shimoike, T. Hayashibara, Y. Ina, and T. Sugiyama. 1999. Reproductive and genetic evidence for a reticulate evolutionary history of mass-spawning corals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1607-1613.
31. Hellberg, M., and V. D. Vacquier. 1999. Rapid evolution of fertilization selectivity and lysin cDNA sequences in Teguline gastropods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:839-848.
32. Hodgson, G. 1988. Potential gamete wastage in synchronously spawning corals due to hybrid inviability. Pp. 70-714 in J. H. Choat, D. Barnes, and M. A. Borowitzka eds. Proceedings of the Sixth International Coral Reef Symposium. Vol. 2. 8-12 August 1988, Townsville, Australia.
33. Howard, D. J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-132.
34. Howard, D. J., and P. G. Gregory. 1993. Post-insemination signaling systems and reinforcement. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340:231-236.
35. Howard, D. J., P. G. Gregory, J. Chu, and M. L. Cain. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52:511-516.
36. Howard, D. J., J. L. Marshall, D. D. Hampton, S. C. Britch, M. L. Draney, J. Chu, and R. G. Cantrell. 2002. The genetics of reproductive isolation: a retrospective and prospective look with comments on ground crickets. Am. Nat. 159:S8-S21.
37. Huvet, A., K. Balabaud, N. Bierne, and P. Boudry. 2001. Microsatellite analysis of 6-hour-old embryos reveals no preferential intraspecific fertilization between cupped oysters Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea angulata. Mar. Biotech. 3:448-453.
38. Kamei, N., and C. G. Glabe. 2003. The species-specific egg receptor for sea urchin sperm adhesion is EBR1, a novel ADAMTS protein. Genes Dev. 17:2502-2507.
39. Knowlton, N., J. L. Maté, H. M. Guzmán, R. Rowan, and J. Jara. 1997. Direct evidence for reproductive isolation among three species of the Montastraea annularis complex in Central America (Panamá and Honduras). Mar. Biol. 127:705-711.
40. Leighton, D. L., and C. A. Lewis. 1982. Experimental hybridization in abalones. Int. J. Invertebr. Reprod. 5:273-282.
41. Lessios, H. A., and C. W. Cunningham. 1990. Gametic incompatibility between species of the sea urchin Echinometra on the two sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Evolution 44:933-941.
42. Levitan, D. R. 2002. The relationship between conspecific fertilization success and reproductive isolation among three congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 56:1599-1609.
43. _. 2004. Density-dependant sexual selection in external fertilizers: variances in male and female fertilization success along the continuum from sperm limitation to sexual conflict in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. Am. Nat. 164: 298-309.
44. Levitan, D. R., and C. Petersen. 1995. Sperm limitation in the sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:228-231.
45. Levitan, D. R., H. Fukami, J. Jara, D. Kline, T. M. McGovern, K. McGhee, C. Swanson, and N. Knowlton. 2004. Mechanisms of reproductive isolation among sympatric broadcast-spawning corals of the Montastraea annularis species complex. Evolution 58:308-323.
46. Lyu, S., and S. K. Allen. 1999. Effect of sperm density on hybridization between Cassostrea virginica (Gmelin) and C. gigas (Thunberg). J. Shellfish Res. 18:459-464.
47. Markow, T. A. 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7756-7760.
48. Marsden, J. R. 1992. Reproductive isolation in two forms of the serpulid polychaete, Spirobranchus polycerus (Schmarda) in Barbados. Bull. Mar. Sci. 51:14-18.
49. McCartney, M. A., and H. A. Lessios. 2002. Quantitative analysis of gametic incompatibility between closely related species of Neotropical sea urchins. Biol. Bull. 202:166-181.
50. McClanahan, T. R., and N. A. Muthiga. 2001. The ecology of Echinometra. Pp. 225-243 in J. M. Lawrence, ed. Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier, New York.
51. McClary, D. J., and M. A. Sewell. 2003. Hybridization in the sea: gametic and developmental constraints on fertilization in sympatric species of Pseudechinus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 284:51-70.
52. Menzel, R. W. 1974. Portuguese and Japanese oysters are the same species. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31:453-456.
53. Metz, E. C., and S. R. Palumbi. 1996. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:397-406.
54. Metz, E. C., R. E. Kane, H. Yanagimachi, and S. R. Palumbi. 1994. Fertilization between closely related sea urchins is blocked by incompatibilities during sperm-egg attachment and early stages of fusion. Biol. Bull. 187:23-34.
55. Metz, E. C., G. Gomez-Gutierrez, and V. D. Vacquier. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA and bindin gene sequence evolution among allopatric species of the sea urchin genus Arbacia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:185-195.
56. Miller, K., and R. Babcock. 1997. Conflicting morphological and reproductive species boundaries in the coral genus Platygyra. Biol. Bull. 192:98-110.
57. Moore, A. R. 1959. On the embryonic development of the sea urchin Allocentrotus fragilis. Biol. Bull. 117:492-496.
58. Nishihira, M., Y. Sato, Y. Arakaki, and M. Tsuchiya. 1991. Ecological distribution and habitat preference of four types of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei on the Okinawan coral reefs. Pp. 91-104 in T. Yanagisawa, I. Yasumasu, C. Oguro, N. Suzuki, and T. Motokawa, eds. Biology of Echinodermata. Balkema, Rotterdam.
59. Owen, B., J. H. McLean, and R. J. Meyer. 1971. Hybridization in the eastern Pacific abalones. Bull. Los Angel. County Mus. Nat. His. Sci. 9:1-37.
60. Palumbi, S. R. 1992. Marine speciation on a small planet. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:114-118.
61. _. 1999. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632-12637.
62. Palumbi, S. R., and E. M. Metz. 1991. Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:227-239.
63. Palumbi, S. R., A. Martin, S. Romano, W. O. McMillan, L. Stice, and G. Grabowski. 1991. The simple fool's guide to PCR. Spec. Publ. Dep. Zool., Univ. of Hawai'i.
64. Palumbi, S. R., G. Grabowsky, T. Duda, L. Geyer, and N. Tachino. 1997. Speciation and the evolution of population structure in tropical Pacific sea urchins. Evolution 51:1506-1517.
65. Pawlik, J. R. 1988. Larval settlement and metamorphosis of sabellariid polychaetes, with special reference to Phragmatopoma lapidosa, a reef-building species, and Sabellaria floridensis, a non-gregarious species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43:41-60.
66. Pernet, B. 1999. Gamete interactions and genetic differentiation among three sympatric polychaetes. Evolution 53:435-446.
67. Price, C. S. C. 1997. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388:663-666.
68. Price, C. S. C., C. H. Kim, J. Posluszny, and J. A. Coyne. 2000. Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:2028-2037.
69. Ptacek, M. B. 2000. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav. Process. 51:111-134.
70. Rahman, M. A., T. Uehara, and L. M. Aslan. 2000. Comparative viability and growth of hybrids between two sympatric species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Aquaculture 183:45-56.
71. Rahman, M. A., S. M. Rahman, and T. Uehara. 2001a. Effects of gamete dilution, age and contact time on fertilization success in the tropical sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei. Galaxea JCRS 3:1-12.
72. Rahman, M. A., T. Uehara, and J. S. Pearse. 2001b. Hybrids of two closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra): Evidence against postzygotic isolating mechanisms. Biol. Bull. 200:97-106.
73. Rawson, P. D., C. Slaughter, and P. O. Yund. 2003. Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus. Mar. Biol. 143:317-325.
74. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
75. Riesberg, L. H., A. H. Desrochers, and S. J. Youn. 1995. Interspecific pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:515-519.
76. Robinson, T., N. A. Johnson, and M. J. Wade. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation - intraspecific and interspecific sperm precedence in Tribolium spp. flour beetles. Heredity 73:155-159.
77. Seehausen, O., and J. J. M. van Alphen. 1998. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:1-8.
78. Shaw, A., Y-H. Lee, C. D. Stout, and V. D. Vacquier. 1994. The species specificity and structure of abalone sperm lysin. Sem. Dev. Biol. 5:209-215.
79. Strathmann, R. 1981. On barriers to hybridization between Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O. F. Müller) and S. pallidus (G. O. Sars). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 55:39-47.
80. Szmant, A. M., E. Weil, M. W. Miller, and D. E. Colón. 1997. Hybridization within the species complex of the scleractinian coral Montastrea annularis. Mar. Biol. 129:561-572.
81. Uehara, T. 1990. Speciation in Echinometra mathaei. Iden. 44:47-53.
82. Uehara, T., H. Asakura, and Y. Arakaki. 1990. Fertilization and hybridization among species of sea urchins. Pp. 305-310 in M. Hoshi, and O. Yamashita, eds. Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
83. Van Oppen, M. J. H., B. L. Willis, T. Van Rheede, and D. J. Miller. 2002. Spawning times, reproductive compatibilities and genetic structuring in the Acropora aspera group: evidence for natural hybridization and semi-permeable species boundaries in corals. Mol. Ecol. 11:1363-1376.
84. Wade, M. J., N. W. Chang, and M. McNaughton. 1995. Incipient speciation in the flour beetle Tribolium confusum - premating isolation between natural populations. Heredity 75:453-459.
85. Wagner, R. H., F. Helfenstein, and E. Danchin. 2004. Female choice of young sperm in a genetically monogamous bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 271:8134-137.
86. Willis, B. L., R. C. Babcock, P. L. Harrison, and C. C. Wallace. 1997. Experimental hybridization and breeding incompatibilities within the mating systems of mass spawning reef corals. Coral Reefs 16:S53-S65.
87. Yund, P. O. 2000. How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free spawners? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:10-13.
88. Yund, P. O., and M. A. McCartney. 1994. Male reproductive success in sessile invertebrates: competition for fertilizations. Ecology 75:2151-2167.