Benchmarking in Australian higher education: The claims and prospects

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 62-69

  James, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888726852     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: 23671793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altbach, Ph. G. & Kelly, D.H. (1985). Higher education in international perspective: A survey and bibliography. London & N.Y.: Mansell Publishing.
2. Andrews, L., Aungles, P., Baker, S. & Sarris, A. (1998). Characteristics and performance of higher education institutions (A preliminary investigation). Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Available; http://wwwdeetya.gov.au/divisions/hed/hjghered/otherpub/heperf.pdf
3. Ashenden, D. & Milligan, S. (1996). The good universities guide. Subiaco, W.A,: Ashenden Milligan
4. Cave, M, Hanney, S., Henkei, M. & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement (3rd ed,). London; Jessica Kingsley.
5. Clark, B. (1996). Substantive growth and innovative organisation: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education, 32, 417-430.
6. Clark, B. (1997). Higher education as a self-guiding society. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(2), 91-100.
7. Cohen, M. & March, J. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity. New York: McGraw-Hill
8. Cotter, R, (1997). Exploring concepts and applications of benchmarking. Leading and Managing, 1(1), 1-8.
9. Craft, A. (Ed.). (1994). International developments in assuring quality in higher education. London: Falmer Press.
10. Cuenin, S, (1988). Performance indicators in higher education; A study of their development and use in 15 OECD countries, Paris; OECD.
11. Davis, D. (1996), The real world of performance indicators: A review of their use in selected countries. London: Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service.
12. Dill, D. (1995). Through Deming's eyes: A cross-national analysis of quality assurance policies. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 95-110.
13. Duke, C (1992). The Learning University: Towards a new paradigm? Buckingham; Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
14. Evers, CWr & Lakomski, G. (1991), Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. Evers, C.W. & Lakomski, G. (1996), Exploring educational administration: Coherentist applications and critical debates. Oxford: Pergamon Press
16. Fitz-enz, J. (1993). Benchmarking staff performance: How staff departments can enhance their value to the customer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Garavan, T. (1997). The learning organization: A review and evaluation. Learning Organization, 4(1), 18-29.
18. Goedegebuure, L & van Vught, F. (1996). Comparative higher education studies: The perspective from the policy sciences. Higher Education, 31, 371-394.
19. Henkel, M. (1991), The new 'Evaluative State'. Public Administration, 69(1), 121-136.
20. Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
21. James, R, & Beattie, K. (1996). Expanding options: Delivery -technologies and postgraduate courseworh. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
22. James, R, & Mclnnis, C. (1997). Coursework masters degrees and quality assurance: Implicit and explicit factors at program level. Quality in Higher Education, 3(2), 101-112.
23. Johnson, T, Ainley, J. & Long, M. (1997). The 1996 Course Experience Questionnaire. Parkville, Vic: Graduate Careers Council of Australia.
24. Johnes, J. & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
25. Karlof, B. & Ostblom, S. (1993), Benchmarking: A signpost to excellence in quality and productivity. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons
26. Kells, H, (Ed). (1993). The development of performance indicators in higher education: A compendium of twelve countries. Paris; OECD.
27. Lindblom, C, (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Lmke, R. (1991), Performance indicators in higher education: Report of a trial evaluation study commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
29. Macneil, J., Testi, J., Cupples, J, & Rimmer, M. (1993). Benchmarking Australia. Melbourne: Longman.
30. Marquardt, M. & Reynolds, A. (1994). The global learning organization: Gaining competitive advantage through continuous learning. Burr Ridge, 1L,; Irwin.
31. McDaniel, O. (1996). The theoretical and practical use of performance indicators. Higher Education Management, 8(3), 125-139
32. McLnnis, C. & James, R, (3995). First year on campus. Diversity in the initial experiences of Australian undergraduates. Canberra; Australian Government Publishing Service.
33. Meade, P. (1995). Utilising the university as a learning organisation to facilitate quality improvement. Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 111-122.
34. Middlehurst, R. (1997). Reinventing higher education: The leadership challenge. Quality in Higher Education, 3(2), 183-198.
35. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
36. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129-150.
37. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London; Random Century Group.
38. Skilbeck, M. (1997). Higher education in a changing environment: Regional, national and trans-national issues. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(2), 101-112.
39. Taylor, F.W. (1947). Scientific management. New York: Harper & Bros.
40. Watkins, K. & Marsick, V, (1993). Sculpting the learning organisation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.