Pupil size and LASIK: A review

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 734-741

  Myung, David ^a   Schallhorn, Steven ^b   Manche, Edward E ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACECLIDINE;

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BINOCULAR VISION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DARK ADAPTATION; FEMTOSECOND LASER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; KERATOMILEUSIS; LIGHT SCATTERING; MESOPIC VISION; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; MYOPIA; OPHTHALMIC EXCIMER LASER; ORTHOKERATOLOGY LENS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; PHOTOPIC VISION; PHOTORECEPTOR; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPILLOMETRY; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; WAVEFRONT ANALYZER; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; EXCIMER LASER; EYE REFRACTION; IRIS; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; THERAPEUTIC USE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; IRIS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; ORGAN SIZE; PUPIL; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84888631628     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-02     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Salz JJ, Trattler W. Pupil size and corneal laser surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:373-379. (Pubitemid 44215048)
2. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, et al. Glare and halo phenomena after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:444-450. (Pubitemid 36396906)
3. Born M, Wolf E. Principles of Optics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1975.
4. Dror I, Sandrov A, Kopeika NS. Experimental investigation of the influence of the relative position of the scattering layer on image quality: the shower curtain effect. Appl Opt. 1998;37:6495-6499. (Pubitemid 128659696)
5. Mulhern MG, Foley-Nolan A, O'Keefe M, Condon PI. Topographical analysis of ablation centration after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:488-494. (Pubitemid 27265598)
6. Fang L, Wang Y, Chen F. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect on visual performance after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2012;29:1482-1488.
7. Snyder AW, Pask C. The Stiles-Crawford effect: explanation and consequences. Vision Res. 1973;13:1115-1137.
8. Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:533-546. (Pubitemid 36009476)
9. Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK. Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:328-332. (Pubitemid 38962113)
10. Probst LE. The problem with pupils. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2-4. (Pubitemid 38234321)
11. Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:35-40. (Pubitemid 30048955)
12. Schnitzler E, Baumeister M, Kohnen T. Scotopic measurement of normal pupils: Colvard versus video vision analyzer infrared pupillometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:859-866. (Pubitemid 30482626)
13. Colvard M. Preoperative measurement of scotopic pupil dilation using an office pupillometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1594-1597. (Pubitemid 28555350)
14. Rosen ES, Gore CL, Taylor D, Chitkara D, Howes F, Kowalewski E. Use of a digital infrared pupillometer to assess patient suitability for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1433-1438. (Pubitemid 37022455)
15. Thompson H, Daroff R, Frisen L, Glazer J, Sanders M. Topics in Neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1979.
16. Twa MD, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Bullimore M. Estimation of pupil size by digital photography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:381-389. (Pubitemid 38366364)
17. Brown SM, Khanani AM, Xu KT. Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:639-644. (Pubitemid 38429641)
18. Schallhorn SC, Tanzer DJ, Kaupp SE, Brown M, Malady SE. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:702-709.
19. Schallhorn SC, Kaupp SE, Tanzer DJ, Tidwell J, Laurent J, Bourque LB. Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1606-1614. (Pubitemid 36962498)
20. Pop M, Payette Y. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:3-10. (Pubitemid 38032202)
21. Haw WW, Manche EE. Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:907-916.
22. Chan A, Manche EE. Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:736-741.
23. Bradley JC, Anderson JE, Xu KT, Brown SM. Comparison of Colvard pupillometer and infrared digital photography for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2129-2132. (Pubitemid 43075379)
24. Brown S. Preoperative pupil size and LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2525-2526.
25. Netto MV, Ambrosio RJ, Wilson SE. Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:337-342. (Pubitemid 38971025)
26. Brown S. Night driving after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2260-2260.
27. Bradley JC, Bentley KC, Mughal AI, Brown SM. Clinical performance of a handheld digital infrared monocular pupillometer for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:277-281.
28. Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB. Monocular versus binocular pupillometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2551- 2556. (Pubitemid 40029757)
29. Bootsma S, Tahzib N, Eggink F, De Brabander J, Nuijts R. Comparison of two pupillometers in determining pupil size for refractive surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:324-330.
30. Nixon WE. Pupil size in refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;23:1435-1436.
31. Holladay JT, Lynn MJ, Waring GO 3rd, Gemmill M, Keehn GC, Fielding B. The relationship of visual acuity, refractive error, and pupil size after radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:70.
32. O'Brart D, Gartry DS, Lohmann CP, Muir M, Marshall J. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: comparison of 4.00-and 5.00-millimeter ablation zones. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;10:87-94.
33. Roberts CW, Koester C. Optical zone diameters for photorefractive corneal surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2275-2281. (Pubitemid 23191255)
34. Klonos GG, Pallikaris J, Fitzke FW. A computer model for predicting image quality after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:S280-S284. (Pubitemid 26089681)
35. Buratto L, Brint SF. LASIK: Principles and Techniques. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 1998.
36. Gimbel HV, ed. LASIK Complications: Prevention and Management. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 1998.
37. Khalifa MA, Allam WA, Shaheen MS. Visual outcome after correcting the refractive error of large pupil patients with wavefront-guided ablation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:2001-2011.
38. Yu J, Chen H, Wang F. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:477-486. (Pubitemid 351668875)
39. Villa C, Gutiérrez R, Jimenez JR, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1031-1037. (Pubitemid 47122108)
40. Schmidt GW, Yoon M, McGwin G, Lee PP, McLeod SD. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1037.
41. Tuan KA, Liang J. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: In-depth statistical analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:215-220.
42. Tahzib NG, Bootsma SJ, Eggink FA, Nabar VA, Nuijts RM. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1943-1951. (Pubitemid 41773167)
43. Lee Y, Hu F, Wang I. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:769-777. (Pubitemid 36418019)
44. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1371-1378. (Pubitemid 36842474)
45. Helgesen A, Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:454-460. (Pubitemid 39199448)
46. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Krueger RR. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:447-453. (Pubitemid 38293097)
47. Randazzo A, Nizzola F, Rossetti L, Orzalesi N, Vinciguerra P. Pharmacological management of night vision disturbances after refractive surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1764-1772. (Pubitemid 41503434)
48. Oshika T, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, Miyata K, Kawana K, Kaji Y. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1334-1338. (Pubitemid 46780738)
49. Queirós A, Villa-Collar C, González-Méijome JM, Jorge J, Gutiérrez AR. Effect of pupil size on corneal aberrations before and after standard laser in situ keratomileusis, custom laser in situ keratomileusis, and corneal refractive therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:97-109.
50. Boxer Wachler BS. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:275-278. (Pubitemid 36278545)
51. Baron WS, Munnerlyn C. Predicting visual performance following excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg. 1992;8:355-362.
52. Chan CC, Boxer Wachler BS. A comparison of CustomCornea myopia algorithms for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1067.
53. Brown SM. Stiles-Crawford effect revisited: considerations for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:792-794.
54. Atchison DA, Scott DH, Strang NC, Artal P. Influence of Stiles- Crawford apodization on visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:1073-1083.
55. Atchison DA, Scott DH. Contrast sensitivity and the Stiles- Crawford effect. Vision Res. 2002;42:1559-1569. (Pubitemid 34628782)