A comparison of CustomCornea myopia algorithms for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 126, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1067-1070

  Chan, Colin C K ^a   Boxer Wachler, Brian S ^a  

^a Boxer Wachler Vision Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; MYOPIA; MYOPIC ASTIGMATISM ALGORITHM; MYOPIC SPHERE ALGORITHM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEA; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MYOPIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 49449105431     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 00039950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.8.1067     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boxer Wachler BS, Huynh VN, El-Shiaty AF, Goldberg D. Evaluation of corneal functional optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(6):948-953.
2. Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(5):663-669.
3. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(5):S596-S601.
4. Nepomuceno RL, Boxer Wachler BS, Scruggs R. Functional optical zone after myopic LASIK as a function of ablation diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(2):379-384.
5. McGhee CN, Craig JP, Sachdev N, Weed KH, Brown AD. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(4):497-509.
6. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(7):1371-1378.
7. Jabbur NS, Sakatani K, O'Brien TP. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(9):1867-1874.
8. Holladay JT, Janes JA. Topographic changes in corneal asphericity and effective optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(6):942-947.
9. Mrochen M, Seiler T. Influence of corneal curvature on calculation of ablation patterns used in photorefractive laser surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(5):S584-S587.
10. Gatinel D, Malet J, Hoang-Xuan T, Azar DT. Analysis of customized corneal ablations: theoretical limitations of increasing negative asphericity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(4):941-948.
11. Hersh PS, Fry K, Blaker W. Spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results and theoretical models of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(11):2096-2104.
12. Roberts C. Biomechanical forces may also induce an oblate shape: the cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4):407-413.
13. Stiles WS. The directional sensitivity of the retina and the spectral sensitivities of the rods and cones. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1939;127(846):64-105.
14. Crawford BH. The luminous efficiency of light entering the eye pupil at different points and its relation to brightness threshold measurements. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1937;124(834):81-96.
15. Moon P, Spencer DE. On the Stiles-Crawford effect. J Opt Soc Am. 1944;34(6):319-329.