Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK

Ophthalmology

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 736-741

  Chan, Annie ^a   Manche, Edward E ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISION;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUPIL; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79953319178     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Haw WW, Manche EE. Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:907-16.
2. Salz JJ, Trattler W. Pupil size and corneal laser surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:373-9. (Pubitemid 44215048)
3. Endl MJ, Martinez CE, Klyce SD, et al. Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1159-64. (Pubitemid 32730003)
4. Boxer Wachler BS, Durrie DS, Assil KK, Krueger RR. Role of clearance and treatment zones in contrast sensitivity: Significance in refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:16-23. (Pubitemid 29022557)
5. Verdon W, Bullimore M, Maloney RK. Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1465-72. (Pubitemid 26406259)
6. Oshika T, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, et al. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1334-8. (Pubitemid 46780738)
7. Martinez CE, Applegate RA, Klyce SD, et al. Effect of pupillary dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1053-62. (Pubitemid 29101830)
8. Oliver KM, O'Brart DP, Stephenson CG, et al. Anterior corneal optical aberrations induced by photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia. J Refract Surg 2001;17:406-13. (Pubitemid 32656266)
9. Oliver KM, Hemenger RP, Corbett MC, et al. Corneal optical aberrations induced by photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1997;13:246-54. (Pubitemid 27247252)
10. O'Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW, et al. Night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: haze and halos. Eur J Ophthalmol 1994;4:43-51. (Pubitemid 24110396)
11. Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:533-46. (Pubitemid 36009476)
12. Freedman KA, Brown SM, Mathews SM, Young RS. Pupil size and the ablation zone in laser refractive surgery: considerations based on geometric optics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003:29:1924-31. (Pubitemid 37385959)
13. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, et al. Glare and halo phenomena after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:444-50. (Pubitemid 36396906)
14. Lee YC, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:769-77.
15. Periman LM, Ambrosio R Jr, Harrison DA, Wilson SE. Correlation of pupil sizes measured with a mesopic infrared pupillometer and a photopic topographer. J Refract Surg 2003;19:555-9. (Pubitemid 37185902)
16. Helgesen A, Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004;82:454-60. (Pubitemid 39199448)
17. Pop M, Payette Y. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 2004;111:3-10. (Pubitemid 38032202)
18. Buhren J, Kuhne C, Kohnen T. Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:2272-80. (Pubitemid 43212914)
19. Mok KH, Lee VW. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations. J Refract Surg 2005;21:141-3. (Pubitemid 40404432)
20. O'Reilly P, O'Reilly J. Photopic pupil size and LASIK [letter]. J Cat Refract Surg 2005;31:1675-6.
21. Cheng ZY, Chu RY, Zhou XT. Influence of diameter of optical zone ablation on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations in myopia [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2006;42:772-6.
22. Schmidt GW, Yoon M, McGwin G, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1037-42. (Pubitemid 47260534)
23. Tabernero J, Klyce SD, Sarver EJ, Artal P. Functional optical zone of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1053-60. (Pubitemid 351261397)
24. Schallhorn SC, Kaupp SE, Tanzer DJ, et al. Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1606-14. (Pubitemid 36962498)
25. Tahzib NG, Bootsma SJ, Eggink FA, et al. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1943-51. (Pubitemid 41773167)