Comparison of Night Driving Performance after Wavefront-Guided and Conventional LASIK for Moderate Myopia

Ophthalmology

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 702-709

  Schallhorn, Steve C ^a   Tanzer, David J ^a   Kaupp, Sandor E ^a   Brown, Mitch ^a   Malady, Stephanie E ^a  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MYOPIA; NIGHT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISION;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORNEAL STROMA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 63149111522     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.038     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey M.D., and Zadnik K. Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers. Cornea 26 (2007) 246-254
2. Jabbur N.S., Sakatani K., and O'Brien T.P. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 1867-1874
3. Bailey M.D., Mitchell G.L., Dhaliwal D.K., et al. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1371-1378
4. Schein O.D., Vitale S., Cassard S.D., and Steinberg E.P. Patient outcomes of refractive surgery: the Refractive Status and Vision Profile. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 665-673
5. Pop M., and Payette Y. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 251-257
6. Hersh P.S., Steinert R.F., Brint S.F., and Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 925-933
7. Brunette I., Gresset J., Boivin J.F., et al., Canadian Refractive Surgery Research Group. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 1790-1796
8. Tahzib N.G., Bootsma S.J., Eggink F.A., et al. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1943-1951
9. Hays R.D., Mangione C.M., Ellwein L., et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 2292-2301
10. Lafond G. Treatment of halos after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 13 (1997) 83-88
11. Boxer Wachler B.S., Durrie D.S., Assil K.K., and Krueger R.R. Role of clearance and treatment zones in contrast sensitivity: significance in refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 16-23
12. Lafond G., Solomon L., and Bonnet S. Retreatment to enlarge small excimer laser optical zones using combined myopic and hyperopic ablations. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) 46-52
13. Knorz M.C., and Neuhann T. Treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism by customized laser in situ keratomileusis based on corneal topography. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2072-2076
14. Alessio G., Boscia F., La Tegola M.G., and Sborgia C. Topography-driven photorefractive keratectomy: results of corneal interactive programmed topographic ablation software. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 1578-1587
15. Mrochen M., Kaemmerer M., and Seiler T. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg 16 (2000) 116-121
16. Kim T.I., Yang S.J., and Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) 432-438
17. Lee H.K., Choe C.M., Ma K.T., and Kim E.K. Measurement of contrast sensitivity and glare under mesopic and photopic conditions following wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK surgery. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) 647-655
18. Moskowitz H., Burns M., Fiorentino D., et al. Driver characteristics and impairment at various BACs (2000), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/pub/impaired_driving/BAC/index.html Accessed April 30, 2008. DOT HS 809 075
19. Featherstone K.A., Bloomfield J.R., Lang A.J., et al. Driving simulation study: bilateral array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 1254-1262
20. Chalita M.R., Chavala S., Xu M., and Krueger R.R. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation to visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 447-453
21. Phusitphoykai N., Tungsiripat T., Siriboonkoom J., and Vongthongsri A. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg 19 suppl (2003) S217-S220
22. Vongthongsri A., Phusitphoykai N., and Naripthapan P. Comparison of wavefront-guided customized ablation vs. conventional ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 18 suppl (2002) S332-S335
23. Brint S.F. Higher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and WaveLight lasers: a prospective randomized trial. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) S799-S803
24. Caster A.I., Hoff J.L., and Ruiz R. Conventional vs wavefront-guided LASIK using the LADARVision4000 excimer laser. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) S786-S791
25. He R., Qu M., and Yu S. Comparison of NIDEK CATz wavefront-guided LASIK to traditional LASIK with the NIDEK CXII excimer laser in myopia. J Refract Surg 21 suppl (2005) S646-S649
26. Yamane N., Miyata K., Samejima T., et al. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3986-3990
27. Kaiserman I., Hazarbassanov R., Varssano D., and Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 454-457
28. Alió J.L., and Montés-Mico R. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 191-197
29. Tran D.B., Sarayba M.A., Bor Z., et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 97-105
30. Waheed S., Chalita M.R., Xu M., and Krueger R.R. Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 346-352
31. Medeiros F.W., Stapleton W.M., Hammel J., et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 23 (2007) 880-887