Ontologies, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence - Hype or prerequisites for international pHealth interoperability?

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 165, Issue , 2011, Pages 11-20

  Blobel, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Generic Component Model; Ontology; PHealth; Semantic interoperability

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

AUTONOMIC COMPUTING; GENERIC COMPONENT MODEL; PHEALTH; SEMANTIC INTEGRATION; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES;

INTEROPERABILITY;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; SEMANTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INTERNATIONALITY; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 79960942413     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-735-2-11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. D. Kaminker, Standards for Interoperability, Tutorial at HL7 January Working Group Meeting 2011.
2. European Commission, Directorate-General for Informatics, DIGIT/01-European eGovernment services (IDABC) (2004) Final European Interoperability Framework-November 2004 (EN)
3. B. Blobel, Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health, Methods Inf Med 49,2 (2010), 123-134.
4. R. Davis, H. Shrobe, and P. Szolovits. What is Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine 14,1 (1993) 17-33
5. B. Blobel, Concept Representation in Health Informatics for Enabling Intelligent Architectures. In: A. Hasman, R. Haux, J. van der Lei, E. De Clercq, F. Roger-France (Edrs.) Ubiquity: Technology for Better Health in Aging Societies, pp. 285-291. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 124. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006.
6. B. Blobel, C. Gonzalez, F. Oemig, D.M. Lopez, P. Nykänen, P. Ruotsalainen, The Role of Architecture and Ontology for Interoperability. In: B. Blobel, E.P. Hvannberg, V. Gunnarsdóttir (Edrs.) Seamless Care-Safe Care: The Challenges of Interoperability and Patient Safety in Health Care, p. 33-39. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 155. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington, 2010.
7. B. Blobel, Analysis, design and implementation of secure and interoperable distributed health information system. Stud Health Technol Inform Vol. 89, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2002.
8. OASIS, OASIS Reference Model for SOA, Version 1.0, OASIS Standard, October 2006: docs.oasisopen. org/soa-rm/v1.0/soa-rm.pdf
9. OASIS Reference Architecture for SOA Foundation, Version 1.0, OASIS Public Review Draft 1, April 2008: docs.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/soa-ra/v1.0/soa- ra-pr-01.pdf
10. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), www.oasis.org
11. The Open Group, www.opengroup.org
12. Object Management Group, Inc., www.omg.org
13. ISO/IEC 10746:1996 Information technology-Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing.
14. IEEE 1471:2000 Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems.
15. B. Blobel, Assessment of Middleware Concepts Using a Generic Component Model. Proceedings of the Conference "Toward An Electronic Health Record Europe '97", pp. 221-228. London, 1997.
16. S. Blackburn. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1996.
17. B. Smith, M. Brochhausen, Establishing and Harmonizing Ontologies in an Interdisciplinary Health Care and Clinical Research Environment. In. B. Blobel et al. (Edrs.) eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge, 219-33. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol 134. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008.
18. T.R. Gruber, Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: R. Poli, N. Guarino (Edrs.) International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padova, Italy, 1993. Available as technical report KSL-93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University: ftp.ksl.ftanford.edu/pub/KSL- Reports/KSL-983-04.ps.
19. P. Lambrix, H. Tan, V. Jakoniene, and L. Strömbäck, Biological Ontologies. In: C.J.O. Baker and K.-H. Cheung (Edrs.) Semantic Web-Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2007
20. Jasper R. and Uschold M. A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications, in: Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends, 1999.
21. M. Rebstock, J. Fengel, H. Paulheim, Ontologies-Based Business Integration, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008.
22. R. Krishnamurthy, V. Ranganathan, B. Senguttuvan, Drug Discovery: An Innovative Approach to Application Integration using SOA & Ontology. White Paper, Cognizant, 2009.
23. Bloe R, Kamareddine F, Nederpelt R (1996) The Barendregt Cube with Definitions and Generalized Reduction. Information and Computation 126 (2), 123-143. (Pubitemid 126411068)
24. F. Kamareddine, T. Laan, R. Nederpelt, A Modern Perspective on Type Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 2004.