Ontology driven health information systems architectures enable pHealth for empowered patients

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Blobel, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Architecture; HIS; Ontology; PHealth; Policy; Privacy

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH; BUSINESS OBJECTIVES; DOMAIN EXPERTS; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC TERMINOLOGY; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEALTH SERVICES; HIS; PARADIGM SHIFTS; PERSONAL HEALTH; PHEALTH; POLICY; PRIVACY; SECURITY AND PRIVACY;

ARCHITECTURE; HEALTH; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ONTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; MARKUP LANGUAGE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTER SECURITY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED;

EID: 78751701691     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blobel B. Introduction into advanced eHealth-the personal health challenge. eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge-Global Experts Summit Textbook. Series "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics" 2008, vol. 134:3-14. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/New York/Tokyo.
2. International Standards Organization, ISO/IEC 10746 Information technology-open distributed processing reference model, Geneva, 1996.
3. Kruchten P. The Rational Unified Process. An Introduction 2003, Addison Wesley, Boston. 3rd edition.
4. Eclipse Foundation, Inc., Eclipse Process Framework. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.eclipse.org/epf/.
5. Blobel B. Educational challenge of health information systems' interoperability. Methods Inf. Med. 2007, 46(1):52-56.
6. Blobel B., Pharow P. Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches. Methods Inf. Med. 2009, 48(2):162-169.
7. Blobel B. Concept representation in health informatics for enabling intelligent architectures. Ubiquity: Technology for Better Health in Aging Societies. Series "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics" 2006, vol. 124:285-291. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/New York/Tokyo.
8. Smith B., Brochhausen M. Establishing and harmonizing ontologies. eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge-Global Experts Summit Textbook. Series "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics" 2008, vol. 134:219-234. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/New York/Tokyo.
9. Rebstock M., Fengel J., Paulheim H. Ontologies-Based Business Integration 2008, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
10. Object Management Group, Inc., (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.omg.org/.
11. Arlow J., Neustadt I. UML2 and the Unified Process 2005, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River. 2nd edition.
12. OpenEHR Foundation. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.openehr.org/.
13. International Standards Organization, ISO TS 22600 Health informatics-privilege management and access control, Geneva, 2007.
14. Blobel B., Nordberg R., Davis J.M., Pharow P. Modelling privilege management and access control. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006, 75(8):597-623.
15. Becker M.Y. Information governance in NHS's NPfIT: a case for policy specification. Proceedings of the IMIA Working Conference "Secure eHealth: Managing Risk to Patient Data" 2006.
16. Barkley JF, Kuhn DR, Rosenthal LS, Skall MW, Cincotta AV, Role-based access control for the web. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://hissa.ncsl.nist.gov/rbac/cals-paper.html.
17. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), XACML 2.0. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php.
18. Health Level 7, Inc. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.hl7.org/.
19. International Standards Organization, ISO/DTS 14265 Health informatics-classification of purposes for the processing personal health informatics, Geneva, 2010.
20. Ferraiolo D.F., Sandhu R., Gavrila S., Kuhn D.R., Chandramouli R. Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 2001, 4(August (3)):224-274.
21. Ren S., Tsai J.J.-P., Frieder O. Adding context into access control model for computer security policy. Advances in Machine Learning Applications in Software Engineering 2007, 439-456. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA. D. Zang, J.J.-P. Tsai (Eds.).
22. Health Level 7, Inc., PASS Functional Model. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.hl7.org/.
23. W3C, OWL: "Web Ontology Language", W3C Recommendation. 10 February 2004 (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/.
24. Stanford University, The Protégé Project. (last accessed on 27.07.10). http://protege.stanfort.edu/.
25. Oemig F., Blobel B. Semantic interoperability between health communication standards through formal ontologies. Medical Informatics in a United and Healthy Europe-Proceedings of MIE 2009, Series "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics", vol. 150 2009, 200-204. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/Oxford/Tokyo/Washington. K.-P. Adlassnig, B. Blobel, J. Mantas, I. Masic (Eds.).