Detailed clinical models: A review

Healthcare Informatics Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 201-214

  Goossen, William ^a,b   Goossen Baremans, Anneke ^b   Van Der Zel, Michael ^b,c  

^a WINDESHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b Results 4 Care BV   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Archetypes; Concept representation; Detailed clinical models; Electronic health records; Health level 7; Information modeling; Templates

Indexed keywords

EID: 80455153087     PISSN: 20933681     EISSN: 2093369X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4258/hir.2010.16.4.201     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Huff SM, Rocha RA, Coyle JF, Narus SP. Integrating detailed clinical models into application development tools. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107: 1058-1062.
2. Parker CG, Rocha RA, Campbell JR, Tu SW, Huff SM. Detailed clinical models for sharable, executable guideines. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107: 145-148.
3. Goossen W. Model once, use multiple times: reusing HL7 domain models from one domain to the other. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107: 366-370.
4. Goossen WT. Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. In: De Clercq, De Moor G, Bellon J, Foulon M, van der Lei J, ed. Collaborative patient centred ehealth. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008: p3-10.
5. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium [Internet]. Round Rock (TX): Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.cdisc.org/site/index.php.
6. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. SNOMED CT [Internet]. Cophenhagen: International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation; c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.ihtsdo.org.
7. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). ISO/ CEN 13972 health informatics: quality criteria and methodology for detailed clinical models draft materials. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2010.
8. The Tolven Institue. Open source healthcare solutions that facilitate collaboration [Internet]. The Tolven Institue; c2009 [cited at 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.tolven.org/index.html.
9. Hoy D, Hardiker NR, McNicoll IT, Westwell P. A feasibility study on clinical templates for the National Health Service in Scotland. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129: 770-774.
10. Health Level 7. Normative edition of the HL7 Standards 2010 [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International; c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.hl7.org.
11. van der Kooij J, Goossen WT, Goossen-Baremans AT, Plaisier N. Evaluation of documents that integrate knowledge, terminology and information models. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 122: 519-522.
12. Center for Interoperable EHR. Clinical contents model. Seoul: Center for Interoperable EHR; c2010 [cite at 2010 Nov 26]. Available from: http://www.clinicalcontentsmodel.org/main.php.
13. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). ISO/ CEN 13606: health Informatics-electronic health record communication. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2010.
14. Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S, Goble CA, Howkins TJ. A framework for modelling the electronic medical record. Methods Inf Med 1993; 32: 109-119.
15. Johnson SB. Generic data modeling for clinical repositories. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 328-339.
16. Beale T. Archetypes constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems [Internet]. c2002-2001 [cited at 2010 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_web_2000 .pdf.
17. Beale T. Archetypes and the EHR. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 96: 238-244.
18. Ocean Informatics. OpenEHR: clinical knowledge manger. New South Wales: Ocean Informatics; c2007-2010 [cited at 2010 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/.
19. White TM, Hauan MJ. Extending the LOINC conceptual schema to support standardized assessment instruments. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 586-599.
20. Blobel B. Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 123-134.
21. National Cancer Institute. CDE browser. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 30]. Available from: https://cdebrowser.nci.nih.gov/CDEBrowser/.
22. Sharfarman M, Gilliam B. Standardizing clinical concept representation: a discussion paper. Toronto: Canada Health Inforway; 2010.
23. Huff SM. Presentation on detailed clinical models. Utrecht: HL7 Netherlands; 2010.
24. Ahn SJ. Development of evaluation metrics for DCM [Internet]. In: HL7 Working Group Meeting 2009; 2009 Sep 20-25; Atlanta, GA. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/patientcare/HL7_DCM_SunjuAhn.pdf.
25. de Bel E. Ontwikkeling van een elektronisch patientendossier op basis van HL7. HL7 Mag 2005; 25: 6-8.
26. Goossen WT, Goossen-Baremans A. Bridging the HL7 template: 13606 archetype gap with detailed clinical models. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 932-6.
27. Dutch Mirror Group on Information Models & Messages. Insight into the choices to be made in standards for the electronic exchange of health record information. Delft: Netherlands Normalization Institute (NEN); 2008.
28. Blobel B. Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 185-190.
29. Bointner K, Duftschmid G. HL7 template model and EN/ISO 13606 archetype object model: a comparison. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 249.
30. Sato L. A NHS logical health record architecture: vision, objectives and success criteria. Technical report. West Yorkshire: National Health Service; 2008.
31. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/ FDIS 18308: health informatics - requirements for an electronic health record architecture. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2008.
32. Health Level 7. Electronic health record systems functional model (HL7 EHR-S FM). Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International; 2010.
33. Cuggia M, Bayat S, Rossille D, Poulain P, Pladys P, Robert H, Duvauferrier R. Comparing the APGAR score representation in HL7 and OpenEHR formalisms. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 250-254.
34. Schadow G, McDonald CJ. The unified code for units of measure [Internet]. Indianapolis (IN): The UCLM Organization; c1999-2010 [cited at 2010 Oct 12]. Available from: http://unitsofmeasure.org/.
35. Regenstrief Institute. Logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC) [Internet]. c1994-2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://loinc.org/.
36. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/ IEC 10746. ITU-T X.901: reference model for open distributed processing. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1998.
37. Object Management Group. OMG model driven architecture: how systems will be built [Internet]. Needham (MA): Object Management Group; c1997-2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.omg.org/mda.
38. Zel M van der, Goossen W. Bridging the gap between software developers and healthcare professionals: model driven application development. Hosp Inf Technol Eur 2009; 3: 20-22.
39. Health Level 7. Service-aware interoperability framework (SAIF) executive summary. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International; c2010 [cited at 2010 Nov 28]. Available from: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=SAIF_ExecutiveSummary.
40. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/ FDIS 21090: health informatics - harmonized data types for information interchange. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2009.
41. Madden R, Sykes C, Ustun T. World Health Organization family of international classifications: definition, scope and purpose. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
42. International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 11179: information technology - Metadata registries (MDR). Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2005.
43. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). CEN/ TS 15699:2009 - health informatics-clinical knowledge resources-metadata. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2009.