Belowground carbon cycling at aspen face: Dynamic responses to Co2 and O3 in developing forests

Developments in Environmental Science

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages 209-226

  Pregitzer, Kurt S ^a   Talhelm, Alan F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Decomposition; Extracellular enzymes; Fine roots; Mycorrhizae; Soil carbon; Soil microorganisms; Soil respiration

Indexed keywords

POPULUS;

EID: 84888377302     PISSN: 14748177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-098349-3.00010-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Ainsworth E.A., Yendrek C.R., Sitch S., Collins W.J., Emberson L.D. The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:637-661.
2. Anderson C.P. Source-sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytol. 2003, 157:213-228.
3. 3. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:813-822.
4. 2. Can. J. Forest Res. 1990, 20:1479-1484.
5. Bond-Lamberty B., Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 2010, 464:579-582.
6. 2. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:538-547.
7. Brantley S.L., Megonigal J.P., Scatena F.N., Balogh-Brunstad Z., Barnes R.T., et al. Twelve testable hypotheses on the geobiology of weathering. Geobiology 2011, 9:140-165.
8. 2 on woody plants. New Phytol. 1994, 127:425-446.
9. 3 on decomposition of fine roots. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25:1501-1510.
10. 3. Oecologia 2006, 147:143-154.
11. 3?. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:983-991.
12. 3 enrichment (FACE) project: an overview. General Technical Report NC-214. USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, USA 2000.
13. Dunbar J., Eichorst S.A., Gallegos-Graves L.V., Silva S., Xie G., et al. Common bacterial responses in six ecosystems exposed to 10 years of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14:1145-1158.
14. Dunn D.B. Some effects of air pollution on Lupinus in the Los Angeles area. Ecology 1959, 40:621-625.
15. 3. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17:2184-2195.
16. Gaudinski J.B., Torn M.S., Riley W.J., Dawson T.E., Joslin J.D., Majdi H. Measuring and modeling the spectrum of fine-root turnover times in three forests using isotopes, minirhizotrons, and the Radix model. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2010, 24:GB3029.
17. 3 impacts on plant development: a meta-analysis of root/shoot allocation and growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:1193-1209.
18. 2. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5:293-309.
19. 3. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43:1518-1527.
20. Hungate B.A., Van Groenigen K.J., Six J., Jastrow J.D., Luo Y., et al. Assessing the effect of elevated carbon dioxide on soil carbon: a comparison of four meta-analyses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:2020-2034.
21. 3. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39:3159-3166.
22. Karberg N., Pregitzer K.S., King J.S., Friend A.L., Wood J.R. Soil carbon dioxide partial pressure and dissolved inorganic carbonate chemistry under elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Oecologia 2005, 142:296-306.
23. Karnosky D.F., Steiner K.C. Provenance and family variation in response of Fraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica to ozone and sulfur dioxide. Phytopathology 1981, 71:804-807.
24. 2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Funct. Ecol. 2003, 17:289-304.
25. Karnosky D.F., Pregitzer K.S., Zak D.R., Kubiske M.E., Hendrey G.R., Weinstein D., Nosal M., Percy K.E. Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:965-981.
26. 3 and daily climatic variation. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:1000-1007.
27. 3: a synthesis of experimental evidence. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2013, 13:179-208.
28. 3. Oecologia 2001, 128:237-250.
29. 2 from four forest FACE experiments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10:1027-1042.
30. 2. New Phytol. 2005, 168:623-636.
31. Kraigher H., Bajc M., Grebanc T., Pritsch K. Mycorrhizosphere complexity. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2013, 13:151-177.
32. 3 on intra-and interspecific competitive ability of aspen. Plant Biol. 2007, 9:342-355.
33. 2, and climate. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2000, 28:611-667.
34. 3. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66:1848-1856.
35. 2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10:926-941.
36. Litton C.M., Raich J.W., Ryan M.G. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13:2089-2109.
37. 3 on leaf litter production and chemistry in trembling aspen and paper birch ecosystems. Tree Physiol. 2005, 15:1511-1522.
38. 3 in a northern hardwood ecosystem. Ecosystems 2009, 12:401-416.
39. Loya W.M., Pregitzer K.S., Karberg N.J., King J.S., Giardina C.P. Reduction of soil carbon formation by tropospheric ozone under increased carbon dioxide levels. Nature 2003, 425:705-707.
40. Matyssek R., Wieser G., Ceulemans R., Rennenberg H., Pretzsch H., et al. Enhanced ozone strongly reduces carbon sink strength of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica)-resume from the free-air fumigation study at Kranzberg Forest. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2527-2532.
41. Matyssek R., Wieser G., Fleischmann F., Grunhage L. Ozone Research, quo vadis? Lessons from the Kranzberg Forest Experiment. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2013, 13:103-129.
42. Nikolova P.S., Andersen C.P., Blaschke H., Matyssek R., Haberle K.-H. Belowground effects of enhanced tropospheric ozone and drought in a beech/spruce forest (Fagus sylvatica L./Picea abies [L.] Karst). Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:1071-1078.
43. 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 42:181-203.
44. 3 in a northern hardwood forest. Ecosystems 2008, 11:505-519.
45. Phillips R.L., Zak D.R., Holmes W.E., White D.C. Microbial community composition and function beneath temperate trees exposed to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and ozone. Oecologia 2002, 131(2):236-244.
46. Pregitzer K.S., Euskirchen E.E. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10:2052-2077.
47. Pregitzer K., Loya W., Kubiske M., Zak D. Soil respiration in northern forests exposed to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Oecologia 2006, 148:503-516.
48. 3. New Phytol. 2008, 180:153-161.
49. Pye J.M. Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: a review. J. Environ. Qual. 1988, 17:347-360.
50. 3. Plant Soil 2012, 355:215-229.
51. Rich S. Ozone damage to plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1964, 2:253-266.
52. 3. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28:243-254.
53. Schmidt M.W., Torn M.S., Abiven S., Dittmar T., Guggenberger G., et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 2011, 478:49-56.
54. Siegenthaler U., Oeschger H. Predicting future atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Science 1978, 199:388-395.
55. Talhelm A.F., Pregitzer K.S., Zak D.R. Species-specific responses to atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone mediate changes in soil carbon. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1219-1228.
56. Talhelm A.F., Pregitzer K.S., Giardina C.P. Long-term leaf production response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Ecosystems 2012, 15:71-82. 10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z.
57. 2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14:264-275.
58. Tingey D.T., Reinert R.A. The effect of ozone and sulphur dioxide singly and in combination on plant growth. Environ. Pollut. 1975, 9:117-125.
59. 2 enrichment and water stress on growth of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus taeda seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 1984, 62:2135-2139.
60. Wittig V.E., Ainsworth E.A., Naidu S.L., Karnosky D.F., Long S.P. Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta-analysis of the ozone literature. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:396-424.
61. 2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis. New Phytol. 2000, 147:201-222.
62. 3: positive feedbacks to soil N cycling sustain decade-long net primary productivity enhancement. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1220-1226.