Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate

Plant, Cell and Environment

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 965-981

  Karnosky, D F ^a   Pregitzer, K S ^a   Zak, D R ^b   Kubiske, M E ^c   Hendrey, G R ^d   Weinstein, D ^e   Nosal, M ^f   Percy, K E ^g  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^e United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service and Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^g LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

C and N cycling; Carbon accumulation and allocation; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Ecosystem scaling; Modelling; Pest interactions; Populus tremuloides; Trembling aspen; Tropospheric ozone

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; OZONE; TREE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WISCONSIN; WORLD;

ACER; ACER SACCHARUM; BETULA PAPYRIFERA; POPULUS TREMULOIDES; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 27644482862     PISSN: 01407791     EISSN: 13653040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01362.x     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Andersen C.P. (2003) Source-sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytologist 157, 213-228.
2. Ashmore M.R. (2005) Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant, Cell and Environment 28 doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01342.x
3. 3. Global Change Biology 10, 1414-1423.
4. 2 and carbon sequestration in forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2, 315-322.
5. 3-induced accelerated senescence in hybrid poplar. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 501-512.
6. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2000) Canada-Wide Standards for Particulate Matter (PM) and Ozone. Available at http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/ pmozone_standard_e.pdf.
7. Chakraborty S., Tiedemann A.V. & Teng P.S. (2000) Climate change: Potential impact on plant diseases. Environmental Pollution 108, 317-326.
8. Chappelka A.H. & Samuelson L.J. (1998) Ambient ozone effects on forest trees of the eastern United States: a review. New Phytologist 139, 91-108.
9. Coleman M.D., Dickson R.E., Isebrands J.G. & Karnosky D.F. (1995) Carbon allocation and partitioning in aspen clones varying in sensitivity to tropospheric ozone. Tree Physiology 15, 593-604.
10. Coleman M.D., Dickson R.E., Isebrands J.G. & Karnosky D.F. (1996) Root growth and physiology of potted and field-grown trembling aspen exposed to tropospheric ozone. Tree Physiology 16, 145-152.
11. Costonis A.C. (1970) Acute foliar injury of eastern white pine induced by sulfur dioxide and ozone. Phytopathology 60, 994-999.
12. 2]. Plant Physiology 134, 520-527.
13. Dickson R.E., Coleman M.D., Pechter P. & Karnosky D.F. (2001) Growth and crown architecture of two aspen genotypes exposed to interacting ozone and carbon dioxide. Environmental Pollution 115, 319-334.
14. 3 Enrichment (FACE) Project in an Overview. General Technical Report NC-214. USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, Rhinelander, WI, USA..
15. Dochinger L.S., Bender F.W., Fox F.L. & Heck W.W. (1970) Chlorotic dwarf of eastern white pine caused by an ozone and sulphur dioxide interaction. Nature 225, 476.
16. Dunn D.B. (1959) Some effects of air pollution on Lupinus in the Los Angeles area. Ecology 40, 621.
17. Federal Register (1997) National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone, Rules and Regulations, 40 CFR Part 50, Final Rule. 62 (138), July 18 1997, p. 38856. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
18. Fowler D., Cape J.N., Coyle M., Flechard C., Kuylenstierna J., Hicks K., Derwent D., Johnson C. & Stevenson D. (1999) The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 116, 5-32.
19. Grennfelt P. (2004) New directions: Recent research findings may change control policies. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2215-2216.
20. Harrington R., Woiwod I. & Sparks T. (1999) Climate change and trophic interactions. Trees 14, 146-150.
21. 2. Global Change Biology 5, 293-309.
22. 3. Global Change Biology 9, 1743-1750.
23. 3, and genotype. Oecologia 137, 233-244.
24. Host G.E., Isebrands J.G., Theseira G.W., Kiniry J.R. & Graham R.L. (1996) Temporal and spatial scaling from individual trees to plantations: a modelling strategy. Biomass and Bioenergy 11, 233-243.
25. Isebrands J.G., Host G.E., Lenz K.E., Wu G. & Stech H.W. (2000) Hierarchical, parallel computing strategies using component object model for process modelling responses to forest plantations to itneracting multiple stresses. In Forest Ecosystem Modelling, Upscaling, and Remote Sensing (eds R.J.M. Ceulemans. F. Veroustraete, V. Gond & J.B.H.F. VanRensbergen), pp. 123-135. SPB. Academic Publishing, The Hague. The Netherlands.
26. Isebrands J.G., McDonald E.P., Kruger E., Hendrey G., Pregitzer K., Percy K., Sober J. & Karnosky D.F. (2001) Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution 115, 359-371.
27. Kaakinen S., Kostiainen K., Ek F., Saranpää P., Kubiske M.E., Sober J., Karnosky D.F. & Vapaavuori E. (2004) Stem wood properties of Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera and Acer saccharum saplings after three years of treatments to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Global Change Biology 10, 1513-1525.
28. Kärenlampi L. & Skärby L. (1996) Critical Levels for Ozone in Europe: Testing and Finalizing the Concepts, UN-ECE Workshop Report. UN-ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. Kuopio, Finland. April 15-17, 1996. Department of Ecology and Environmental Science. University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
29. Karlsson P.E., Selldén G. & Pleijel H. (eds) (2003) Establishing Ozone Critical Levels II UNECE Workshop Report. IVL report B 1523. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Gothenburg, Sweden.
30. Karnosky D.F. (2005) Ozone effects on forest ecosystems under a changing global environment. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 60, 353-358.
31. Karnosky D.F., Gagnon Z.E., Dickson R.E., Coleman M.D., Lee E.H. & Isebrands J.G. (1996) Changes in growth, leaf abscission, and biomass associated with seasonal tropospheric ozone exposures of Populus tremuloides clones and seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26, 23-37.
32. Karnosky D.F., Gielen G., Ceulemans R., Schlesinger W.H., Norby R.J., Oksanen E., Matyssek R. & Hendrey G.R. (2001) Face systems for studying the impacts of greenhouse gases on forest ecosystems. In The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems (eds D.F. Karnosky, G. Scarascia-Mugnozza, R. Ceulemans & J. Innes), pp. 297-324. CABI Publishing, New York, USA.
33. 3-gradient and a FACE experiment. Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution 116, 311-322.
34. Karnosky D.F., Percy K.E., Chappelka A.H. & Krupa S.V. (2003a) Air pollution and global change impacts on forest ecosystems: Monitoring and research needs. In Air Pollution, Global Change and Forests in the New Millennium (eds D.F. Karnosky, K.E. Percy, A.H. Chappelka, J. Pikkarainen & C.J. Simpson), pp. 447-459. Elsevier. Oxford. UK.
35. 3 on trembling aspen: results from the aspen FACE experiment. Functional Ecology 17, 289-304.
36. Karnosky D.F., Percy K.E., Mankovska B., Prichard T., Noormets A., Dickson R.E., Jepsen E. & Isebrands J.G. (2003c) Ozone affects the fitness of trembling aspen. In Air Pollution, Global Change and Forests in the New Millennium (eds D.F. Karnosky, K.E. Percy, A.H. Chappelka, J. Pikkarainen & C.J. Simpson), pp. 199-209. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
37. 3 predisposes aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) to infection by rust (Melampsora medusae f.sp. tremuloidae). Global Change Biology 8, 329-338.
38. 2: Case Studies, Processes and Perspectives. Ecological Studies, (eds J. Nösberger, S.P. Long, G.R. Hendry, M. Stitt, R.J. Norby & H. Bum). Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany, in press.
39. Keeling C.M., Whort T.P., Wahlen M. & Vander Plict J. (1995) International extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature 375, 666-670.
40. 2 from four forest FACE experiments. Global Change Biology 10, 1027-1042.
41. 3. Oecologia 128, 237-250.
42. Kolb T.E. & Matyssek R. (2001) Limitations and perspectives about scaling ozone impacts in trees. Environmental Pollution 115, 373-393.
43. 3. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5, 17-26.
44. Kopper B.J. & Lindroth R.L. (2003b) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on the genotypic response of aspen phytochemistry and the performance of an herbivore. Oecologia 134, 95-103.
45. 3) and adverse crop response. Environmental Review 5, 55-77.
46. 3) concentrations. Environmental Pollution 124, 173-178.
47. 2. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16, 639-648.
48. Laurence J.A. & Andersen C.P. (2003) Ozone and natural systems: understanding exposure, response and risk. Environment Internation 29, 155-160.
49. Laurence J.A., Retzlaff W.A., Kern J.S., Lee E.H., Hogsett W.E. & Weinstein D.A. (2001) Predicting the regional impact of ozone and precipitation on the growth of loblolly pine and yellow-poplar using linked TREGRO and ZELIG models. Forest Ecology and Management 146, 251-267.
50. Lindroth R.L., Kopper B.J., Parsons W.F.J., Bockheim J.G., Sober J., Hendrey G.R., Pregitzer K.S., Isebrands J.G. & Karnosky D.F. (2001) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on foliar chemical composition and dynamics in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera). Environmental Pollution 115, 395-404.
51. 3 concentrations differentially affect selected groups of the fauna in temperate forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 1521-1524.
52. Loya W.M., Pregitzer K.S., Karberg N.J., King J.S. & Giardina C.P. (2003) Reduction of soil carbon formation by tropospheric ozone under elevated carbon dioxide. Nature 425, 705-707.
53. 3 tolerance. Ekológia (Bratislava) 18, 200-210.
54. 3 gradient. Ekológia (Bratislava) 22 (Suppl. 1), 235-243.
55. Martin M.J., Host G.E., Lenz K.E. & Isebrands J.G. (2001) Simulating the growth response of aspen to elevated ozone; a mechanistic approach to scaling a leaf-level model of ozone effects on photosynthesis to a complex canopy architecture. Environmental Pollution 115, 425-436.
56. Matyssek R. & Sandermann H. (2003) Impact of ozone on trees: an ecophysiological perspective. In Progress in Botany 64 (eds K. Esser, U. Lüttge, W. Beyschlag & F. Hellwig). pp. 349-404. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
57. 3 in aggrading aspen stands. Functional Ecology 16, 792-801.
58. McLeod A.R. & Long S.P. (1999) Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) in global change research: a review. Advances in Ecological Research 28, 1-56.
59. Miller P.R. & McBride J.R. (eds) (1999) Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California, pp. 397-416. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
60. Miller P.R., McCutchan M.H. & Milligan H.P. (1972) Oxidant air pollution in the Central Valley, Sierra Nevada foothills, and Mineral King Valley of California. Atmospheric Environment 6, 623-633.
61. Miller P.R. & Millecan A.A. (1971) Extent of oxidant air pollution damage to some pine and other conifers in California. Plant Disease Reporter 55, 555-559.
62. Miller P.R., Parmeter J.R. Jr, Taylor O.C. & Cardiff E.A. (1963) Ozone injury to foliage of Pinus ponderosa. Phytopathology 53, 1072-1076.
63. Mondor E.B., Tremblay M.N., Awmack C.S. & Lindroth R.L. (2004) Divergent pheromone-mediated insect behaviour under global atmospheric change. Global Change Biology 10, 1820-1824.
64. Noormets A., McDonald E.P., Dickson R.E., Kruger E.L., Sober A., Isebrands J.G. & Karnosky D.F. (2001a) The effect of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on leaf- and branch-level photosynthesis and potential plant-level carbon gain in aspen. Trees 15, 262-270.
65. 3. Plant, Cell and Environment 24, 327-336.
66. Nosal M., Legge A.H. & Krupa S.V. (2000) Application of a stochastic, Weibull probability generator for replacing missing data on ambient concentrations of gaseous pollutants. Environmental Pollution 108, 439-446.
67. Oksanen E. (2003) Physiological responses of birch (Betula pendula) to ozone: a comparison between open-soil-grown trees exposed for six growing seasons and potted seedlings exposed for one season. Tree Physiology 23, 603-614.
68. 2 accumulation in field-grown aspen and birch is linked to foliar ultrastructure and peroxisomal activity. New Phytologist 161, 791-799.
69. 2 and ozone in leaf morphology of aspen (Populus tremuloides) and birch (Betula papyrifera) in aspen FACE experiment. Environmental Pollution 115, 437-446.
70. 3. Global Change Biology 10, 1666-1677.
71. Pell E.J., Enyedi A., Eckardt N. & Landry L. (1990) Ozone-induced alterations in quantity and activity of rubisco: implications for foliar senescence. In Biology Oxidation Systems (eds B.G. Fox & J.D. Lipscomb), pp. 389-403. Academic Press, New York, USA.
72. 3-enriched atmospheres. Nature 420, 403-407.
73. Percy K.E., Legge A.H. & Krupa S.V. (2003a) Tropospheric ozone: A continuing threat to global forests? In Air Pollution, Global Change and Forests in the New Millennium (eds D.F. Karnosky, K.E. Percy, A.H. Chappelka, J. Pikkarainen & C.J. Simpson), pp. 85-118. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
74. Percy K.E., Mankovska B., Hopkin A., Callan B. & Karnosky D.F. (2003b) Ozone affects leaf surface pest interactions. In Air Pollution, Global Change and Forests in the New Millennium (eds D.F. Karnosky, K.E. Percy, A.H. Chappelka, J. Pikkarainen & C.J. Simpson), pp. 247-257. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
75. 3. Oecologia 131, 236-244.
76. Piva R.J. (1996) Pulpwood Production in the Lake States, 1994, Research Note NC-368. USDA. Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Rhinelander, WI, USA.
77. Rausher H.M., Isebrands J.G., Host G.E., Dickson R.E., Dickmann D.I., Crow T.R. & Michael D.A. (1990) ECOPHYS: an ecosphysiological growth process model for juvenile poplar. Tree Physiology 7, 255-281.
78. Samuelson L. & Kelly J.M. (2001) Scaling ozone effects from seedlings to forest trees. New Phytologist 149, 21-41.
79. 3 in trembling aspen and sugar maple. Ekologia (Bratislava) 22 (Suppl. 1), 318-331.
80. Skärby L., Ro-Poulsen H., Wellburn F.A.M. & Sheppard L.J. (1998) Impacts of ozone on forests: a European perspective. New Phytologist 139, 109-122.
81. Tema Nord (1994) Critical Levels for Tropospheric Ozone - Concepts and Criteria Tested for Nordic Conditions. L. Skärby (Coordinator). Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark.
82. Theseira G.W., Host G.E., Isebrands J.G. & Whisler F.D. (2003) SOILPSI: a potential-driven three-dimensional soil water redistribution model - description and comparative evaluation. Environmental Software and Modeling 18, 13-23.
83. UN-ECE (1988) ECE Critical Levels Workshop, Final Draft Report. March 14-18, 1988. UN-ECE, Bad Harzburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
84. Urban D.L. (1990) A versatile model to simulate forest pattern: A user's guide to Zelig, Version 1.0. Environmental. Sciences Department. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., USA
85. Urban D.L., Bonan G.B., Smith T.M. & Shugart H.H. (1991) Spatial applications of gap models. Forest Ecology and Management 42, 95-110.
86. Weinstein D.A., Beloin R.M. & Yanai R.D. (1991) Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stress. Tree Physiology 9, 127-146.
87. Weinstein D.A., Gollands B. & Retzlaff W.A. (2001b) The effects of ozone on a lower slope forest of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park: Simulations Linking an Individual Tree Model to a Stand Model. Forest Science 47, 29-42.
88. Weinstein D.A., Laurence J.A., Retzlaff W.A., Kern J.S., Lee E.H., Hogsett W.E. & Weber J. (2005) Predicting the effects of tropospheric ozone on regional productivity of ponderosa pine and white fir. Forest Ecology and Management 205, 73-89.
89. Weinstein D.A., Woodbury P.B., Gollands B., King P., Lepak L. & Pendleton D. (2001a) Assessment of Effects of Ozone on Forest Resources in the Southern Appalachian Mountains, Final Report. Southern Appalachian Mountain Initiative, Asheville, NC, USA.
90. 3? Environmental Pollution 115, 473-481.