Tracking the cellulolytic activity of Clostridium thermocellum biofilms

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Dumitrache, Alexandru ^a   Wolfaardt, Gideon M ^a,b   Allen, David Grant ^a   Liss, Steven N ^c   Lynd, Lee R ^d  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b STELLENBOSCH INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (South Africa)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofilm kinetics; Cellulose conversion; Clostridium thermocellum; CO ssub 2 esub production

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBLE SURFACE AREAS; BIOFILM KINETICS; CELLULOLYTIC BACTERIUM; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CONTINUOUS-FLOW REACTORS; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY;

BIOFILMS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE; CLOSTRIDIUM; KINETICS;

SUBSTRATES;

BIOFILM; CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE; DIGESTIBILITY; HYDROLYSIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; REACTION KINETICS; SUBSTRATE; THERMOPHILIC BACTERIUM;

CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM;

EID: 84888253787     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-175     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Form and function of clostridium thermocellum biofilms. Dumitrache A, Wolfaardt G, Allen G, Liss SN, Lynd LR, Appl Environ Microbiol 2013 79 1 231 239 10.1128/AEM.02563-12 23087042
2. Cellulosomes-structure and ultrastructure. Bayer EA, Shimon LJW, Shoham Y, Lamed R, J Struct Biol 1998 124 2-3 221 234 10049808 (Pubitemid 29143062)
3. Fermentation of cellulosic substrates in batch and continuous culture by clostridium thermocellum. Lynd LR, Grethlein HE, Wolkin RH, Appl Environ Microbiol 1989 55 12 3131 3139 16348075 (Pubitemid 20002124)
4. Closing the carbon balance for fermentation by clostridium thermocellum (ATCC 27405). Ellis LD, Holwerda EK, Hogsett D, Rogers S, Shao X, Tschaplinski T, Thorne P, Lynd LR, Bioresour Technol 2012 103 1 293 299 10.1016/j.biortech. 2011.09.128 22055095
5. Growth phase-dependant enzyme profile of pyruvate catabolism and end-product formation in clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405. Rydzak T, Levin DB, Cicek N, Sparling R, J Biotechnol 2009 140 3-4 169 175 19428711
6. Numerical analysis of the impact of structural changes in cellulosic substrates on enzymatic saccharification. Seo DJ, Fujita H, Sakoda A, Bioresour Technol 2012 118 323 331 22705539
7. Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Weimer PJ, Lopez-Guisa JM, French AD, Appl Environ Microbiol 1990 56 8 2421 2429 2403252 (Pubitemid 20235684)
8. Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: a review. Barakat A, de Vries H, Rouau X, Bioresour Technol 2013 134 362 373 23499177
9. Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Lynd LR, Annu Rev Energy Environ 1996 21 1 403 465 10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.403 (Pubitemid 126503795)
10. Energy biotechnology. Lynd LR, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008 19 3 199 201 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.005
11. Characteristics of cellulose colonization by a mesophilic, cellulolytic clostridium (strain C401). Gelhaye E, Petitdemange H, Gay R, Res Microbiol 1992 143 9 891 895 10.1016/0923-2508(92)90076-Z 1299841 (Pubitemid 23008854)
12. Application of flowcell technology for monitoring biofilm development and cellulose degradation in leachate and rumen systems. O'Sullivan C, Burrell PC, Pasmore M, Clarke WP, Blackall LL, Bioresour Technol 2008 100 1 492 496 18692390
13. Continuous live cell imaging of cellulose attachment by microbes under anaerobic and thermophilic conditions using confocal microscopy. Wang ZW, Lee SH, Elkins JG, Li Y, Hamilton-Brehm S, Morrell-Falvey JL, J Environ Sci (China) 2013 25 5 849 856 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60104-1 24218813
14. Validity of using accumulated gas pressure readings to measure forage digestion in vitro: a comparison involving three forages. Schofield P, Pell AN, J Dairy Sci 1995 78 10 2230 2238 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76850-3 8598407
15. Different techniques to study rumen fermentation characteristics of maturing grass and grass silage. Cone JW, Van Gelder AH, Soliman IA, De Visser H, Van Vuuren AM, J Dairy Sci 1999 82 5 957 966 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75315- 4 10342234 (Pubitemid 129601759)
16. Development and evaluation of methods to infer biosynthesis and substrate consumption in cultures of cellulolytic microorganisms. Holwerda EK, Ellis LD, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2013 110 9 2380 2388 10.1002/bit.24915 23568345
17. Atomic force microscopy applied to the study of whatman paper surface deteriorated by a cellulolytic filamentous fungus. Piantanida G, Pinzari F, Montanari M, Bicchieri M, Coluzza C, Macromol Symp 2006 238 92 97 10.1002/masy.200650613 (Pubitemid 43901395)
18. Surface microbiology of cellulolytic bacteria. Dumitrache A, Wolfaardt GM, Lynd LR, Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology P.O. BOX 605, HERNDON, VA 20172, USA: ASM Press, Baltz RH, Davies JE, Demain AL, 3 2010 634 643
19. Factors influencing attachment of thermophilic bacilli to stainless steel. Parkar SG, Flint SH, Palmer JS, Brooks JD, J App Microbiol 2001 90 901 908 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x (Pubitemid 32500237)
20. Thermophilic bacilli and their importance in dairy processing. Burgess SA, Lindsay D, Flint SH, Int J Food Microbiol 2010 144 215 225 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.027 21047695
21. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN, J Anim Sci 1994 72 11 2980 2991 7730194
22. Testing alternative kinetic models for utilization of crystalline cellulose (avicel) by batch cultures of clostridium thermocellum. Holwerda EK, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2013 110 9 2389 2394 10.1002/bit.24914 23568291
23. Characterization of 13 newly isolated strains of anaerobic, cellulolytic, thermophilic bacteria. Ozkan M, Desai SG, Zhang Y, Stevenson DM, Beane J, White EA, Guerinot ML, Lynd LR, J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2001 27 5 275 280 10.1038/sj.jim.7000082 11781801 (Pubitemid 34044477)
24. CO§ssub§2§esub§ Production as an indicator of Biofilm metabolism. Kroukamp O, Wolfaardt GM, Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 75 13 4391 4397 10.1128/AEM.01567-08 19346353