Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: A review

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 134, Issue , 2013, Pages 362-373

  Barakat, Abdellatif ^a   de Vries, Hugo ^a   Rouau, Xavier ^a  

^a UMR IATE   (France)

Author keywords

Biorefinery; Energy efficiency; Lignocellulosic biomass; Mechanical size reduction; Pretreatments

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOCONVERSION; BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; DEGRADATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; REFINING; SIZE DETERMINATION;

BIOREFINERIES; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PRE-TREATMENTS; REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SIZE REDUCTIONS;

CHEMICAL RESISTANT MATERIALS;

ARABINOSE; CELLULOSE; GALACTOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MANNOSE; POLYMER; XYLOSE;

CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FRACTIONATION; LIGNIN; LITERATURE REVIEW; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLYMER; REFINING INDUSTRY;

BIOMASS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENZYME DEGRADATION; HYDROLYSIS; MOISTURE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLANT CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 84875822959     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.169     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Adapa P., Tabil L., Schoenau G. Grinding performance and physical properties of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 35:549-561.
2. Akin D.E. Plant cell wall aromatics: influence on degradation of biomass. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2008, 2:288-303.
3. Arias B., Pevida C., Fermoso J., Plaza M.G., Rubiera F., Pis J.J. Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:169-175.
4. Barakat A., Monlau F., Steyer J.P., Carrere H. Effect of lignin-derived and furan compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates on biomethane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104:90-99.
5. Bitra V.S.P., Womac A.R., Igathinathane C., Miu P.I., Yang Y.T., Smith D.R., Chevanan N., Sokhansanj S. Direct measures of mechanical energy for knife mill size reduction of switchgrass, wheat straw, and corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:6578-6585.
6. Brethauer S., Wyman C.E. Review: continuous hydrolysis and fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4862-4874.
7. Cadoche L., Lopez G.D. Assessment of size-reduction as a preliminary step in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic wastes. Biol. Wastes 1989, 30:153-157.
8. Chang V.S., Holtzapple M.T. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:5-37.
9. Choi W.S., Chung H.Y., Yoon B.R., Kim S.S. Applications of grinding kinetics analysis to fine grinding characteristics of some inorganic materials using a composite grinding media by planetary ball mill. Powder Technol. 2001, 115:209-214.
10. Ciolacu D., Ciolacu F., Popa V.I. Supramolecular structure - a key parameter for cellulose biodegradation. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 272:136-142.
11. Da Silva A.S.A., Inoue H., Endo T., Yano S., Bon E.P.S. Milling pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and straw for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7402-7409.
12. Ebringerová A., Heinze T. Xylan and xylan derivatives - biopolymers with valuable properties. 1. Naturally occurring xylans structures, isolation procedures and properties. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21:542-556.
13. Fan L.T., Lee Y.H., Beardmore D.R. The influence of major structural features of cellulose on rate of enzymatic-hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23:419-424.
14. Fry S.C. Cross-linking of matrix polymers in the growing cell walls of angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1986, 37:165-186.
15. Gama F.M., Mota M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. 1. Relationship between kinetics and physico-chemical parameters. Biocatal. Biotransform. 1997, 15:221-236.
16. Gharpuray M.M., Lee Y.H., Fan L.T. Structural modification of lignocellulosics by pretreatments to enhance enzymatic-hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25:157-172.
17. Gupta R., Lee Y.Y. Mechanism of cellulase reaction on pure cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102:1570-1581.
18. Hendriks A.T.W.M., Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:10-18.
19. Hideno A., Inoue H., Tsukahara K., Fujimoto S., Minowa T., Inoue S., Endo T., Sawayama S. Wet disk milling pretreatment without sulfuric acid for enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2706-2711.
20. Hideno A., Inoue H., Yanagida T., Tsukahara K., Endo T., Sawayama S. Combination of hot compressed water treatment and wet disk milling for high sugar recovery yield in enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104:743-748.
21. Jin S., Chen H. Superfine grinding of steam-exploded rice straw and its enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 30:225-230.
22. Jin S., Chen H. Fractionation of fibrous fraction from steam-exploded rice straw. Process Biochem. 2007, 42:188-192.
23. Kaparaju P., Serrano M., Thomsen A.B., Kongjan P., Angelidaki I. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2562-2568.
24. Kratky L., Jirout T. Biomass size reduction machines for enhancing biogas production. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2011, 34:391-399.
25. Kumar R., Wyman C.E. Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology?. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:4193-4202.
26. Kumar P., Barrett D.M., Delwiche M.J., Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:3713-3729.
27. Lapierre C. Application of new methods for the investigation of lignin structure. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility 1993, 133-163. American Society of Agronomy, Madison. H.G. Jung, D.R. Buxton, R.D. Hatfield, J. Ralph (Eds.).
28. Lee J.W., Gwak K.S., Park J.Y., Park M.J., Choi D.H., Kwon M., Choi I.G. Biological pretreatment of softwood Pinus densiflora by three white rot fungi. J. Microbiol. 2007, 485-491.
29. Lee S.-H., Teramoto Y., Endo T. Enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass micro/nanofibrillated by continuous extrusion process I - effect of additives with cellulose affinity. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:275-279.
30. Lee S.-H., Chang F., Inoue S., Endo T. Increase in enzyme accessibility by generation of nanospace in cell wall supramolecular structure. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7218-7223.
31. Lee S.-H., Inoue S., Teramoto Y., Endo T. Enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass micro/nanofibrillated by continuous extrusion process II: effect of hot-compressed water treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9645-9649.
32. Mani S., Tabil L.G., Sokhansanj S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 27:339-352.
33. Mani S., Tabil L.G., Sokhansanj S. Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30:648-654.
34. Mansfield S.D., Meder R. Cellulose hydrolysis and the role of monocomponent cellulases in crystalline cellulose degradation. Cellulose 2003, 10:159-169.
35. Mathew A.K., Chaney K., Crook M., Humphries A.C. Alkaline pre-treatment of oilseed rape straw for bioethanol production: evaluation of glucose yield and pre-treatment energy consumption. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:6547-6553.
36. Mathew A.K., Chaney K., Crook M., Humphries A.C. Dilute acid pre-treatment of oilseed rape straw for bioethanol production. Renewable Energy 2011, 36:2424-2432.
37. McNeil M., Albersheim P., Taiz L., Jones R. The structure of plant cell walls. Plant Physiol. 1975, 55:64-68.
38. Miao Z., Grift T.E., Hansen A.C., Ting K.C. Energy requirement for comminution of biomass in relation to particle physical properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33:504-513.
39. Monlau F., Barakat A., Trably E., Dumas C., Steyer J.-P.h., Carrère H. Lignocellulosic materials into biohydrogen and biomethane: impact of structural features and pretreatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 43:1-65.
40. Monlau F., Barakat A., Steyer J.P., Carrere H. Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatments on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 120:241-247.
41. Mooney C.A., Mansfield S.D., Beatson R.P., Saddler J.N. The effect of fiber characteristics on hydrolysis and cellulase accessibility to softwood substrates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 25:644-650.
42. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:673-686.
43. Palmowski L.M., Muller J.A. Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:155-162.
44. Palmowski L.M., Muller J.A. Anaerobic degradation of organic materials - significance of the substrate surface area. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47:231-238.
45. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:25-33.
46. Pan X., Xie D., Yu R.W., Saddler J.N. The bioconversion of mountain pine beetle-killed lodgepole pine to fuel ethanol using the organosolv process. Biotechnol. Bioenergy 2008, 101:39-48.
47. Papatheofanous M.G., Billa E., Koullas D.P., Monties B., Koukios E.G. Optimizing multisteps mechanical-chemical fractionation of wheat straw components. Ind. Crops Prod. 1998, 7:249-256.
48. Phanphanich M., Mani S. Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1246-1253.
49. 2 catalyzed steam-pretreated wheat and spruce material. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46:159-169.
50. Puls J. Chemistry and biochemistry of hemicelluloses: relationship between hemicellulose structure and enzymes required for hydrolysis. Macromol. Symp. 1997, 120:183-196.
51. Repellin V., Govin A., Rolland M., Guyonnet R. Energy requirement for fine grinding of torrefied wood. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:923-930.
52. Rollin J.A., Zhu Z., Sathitsuksanoh N., Zhang Y.H.P. Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol. Bioenergy 2010, 108:22-30.
53. Salmen L., Olsson A.M. Interaction between hemicelluloses, lignin and cellulose: structure-property relationships. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 1998, 24:99-103.
54. Sarkanen K.V., Hergert H.L. Classification and distribution. Lignins - Occurrence, Formation, Structure and Reaction 1971, 43-89. Wiley-Interscience, New-York. K.V. Sarkanen, C.H. Ludwig (Eds.).
55. Schell D.J., Harwood C. Milling of lignocellulosic biomass - results of pilot-scale testing. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1994, 45-6:159-168.
56. Sharma S.K., Mishra I.M., Sharma M.P., Saini J.S. Effect of particle-size on biogas generation from biomass residues. Biomass 1988, 17:251-263.
57. Silva G.G.D., Rouau X. Successive centrifugal grinding and sieving of wheat straw. Powder Technol. 2011, 208:266-270.
58. Sinitsyn A.P., Gusakov A.V., Vlasenko E.Y. Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1991, 30:43-59.
59. Sun L., Simmons B.A., Singh S. Understanding tissue specific compositions of bioenergy feedstocks through hyperspectral Raman imaging. Biotechnol. Bioenergy. 2010, 108:286-295.
60. Taherzadeh M.J., Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9:1621-1651.
61. Teramoto Y., Lee S.-H., Endo T. Pretreatment of woody and herbaceous biomass for enzymatic saccharification using sulfuric acid-free ethanol cooking. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:8856-8863.
62. Vanholme R., Morreel K., Ralph J., Boerjan W. Lignin engineering. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2008, 11:278-285.
63. Watanabe T. Structural studies on the covalent bonds between lignin and carbohydrate in lignin-carbohydrate complexes by selective oxidation with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone. Wood Res. 1989, 76:59-123.
64. Wingren A., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnology Progress 2003, 19:1109-1117.
65. Wyman C.E., Dale B.E., Elander R.T., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M.R., Lee Y.Y., Mitchinson C., Saddler J.N. Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnol. Progr. 2009, 25:333-339.
66. Yang B., Wyman C.E. Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2008, 2:26-40.
67. Yoshida M., LIU Y., Uchida S., Kawarada K., Ukagami Y., Ichinose H., Kaneko S., Fukuda K. Effects of cellulose crystallinity, hemicellulose, and lignin on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis to monosaccharides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72:805-810.
68. Zhu, J.Y., Pan, X.J., 2010. Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4992-5002 (Special Issue on Lignocellulosic Bioethanol: Current Status and Perspectives).
69. Zhu L., O'Dwyer J.P., Chang V.S., Granda C.B., Holtzapple M.T. Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:3817-3828.
70. Zhu J.Y., Wang G.S., Pan X.J., Gleisner R. Specific surface to evaluate the efficiencies of milling and pretreatment of wood for enzymatic saccharification. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:474-485.
71. Zhu J., Pan X., Zalesny R. Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies, and recalcitrance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87:847-857.
72. Zhu W., Zhu J.Y., Gleisner R., Pan X.J. On energy consumption for size-reduction and yields from subsequent enzymatic saccharification of pretreated lodgepole pine. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2782-2792.