Testing alternative kinetic models for utilization of crystalline cellulose (Avicel) by batch cultures of Clostridium thermocellum

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2389-2394

  Holwerda, Evert K ^a   Lynd, Lee R ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic cellulose fermentation; Cell yield; Clostridium thermocellum; Growth rate; Kinetic model

Indexed keywords

BATCH CULTURE; CELL YIELDS; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; KINETIC MODELS; SECOND ORDERS; SECOND-ORDER RATE CONSTANTS; SIGMOIDAL CURVES;

BATCH CELL CULTURE; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CELLS; CELLULOSE; CLOSTRIDIUM; CYTOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; KINETIC PARAMETERS; KINETIC THEORY; MICROORGANISMS; RATE CONSTANTS;

SUBSTRATES;

CARBON; CELLOBIOSE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; KINETICS; NONHUMAN;

ANAEROBIC CELLULOSE FERMENTATION; CELL YIELD; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; GROWTH RATE; KINETIC MODEL;

ANAEROBIOSIS; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOSE; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; FERMENTATION; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL;

CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM;

EID: 84880827914     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24914     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bayer EA, Belaich JP, Shoham Y, Lamed R. 2004. The cellulosomes: Multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:521-554.
2. Demain AL, Newcomb M, Wu JHD. 2005. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(1):124-154.
3. Fogler HS. 2005. Elements of chemical reaction engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 838 p.
4. Hogsett D. 1995. Cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum for the Production of Ethanol. PhD thesis. Hanover: Dartmouth College.
5. Holwerda EK, Hirst K, Lynd LR. 2012. A defined growth medium with very low background carbon for culturing Clostridium thermocellum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39(6):943-947.
6. Holwerda EK, Ellis LD, Lynd LR. 2013. Development and evaluation of methods to infer biosynthesis and substrate consumption in cultures of cellulolytic microorganisms. Biotechnol Bioeng 110(9):2380-2388.
7. Jensen PD, Hardin MT, Clarke WP. 2009. Effect of biomass concentration and inoculum source on the rate of anaerobic cellulose solubilization. Bioresour Technol 100(21):5219-5225.
8. Johnson KA, Goody RS. 2011. The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis Menten Paper. Biochemistry 50(39):8264-8269.
9. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology (vol 66, pg 506, 2002). Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(4):739.
10. Michaelis L, Menten ML. 1913. The kenetics of the inversion effect. Biochemische Zeitschrift 49:333-369.
11. Monod J. 1949. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol 3:371-394.
12. Pirt SJ. 1975. Principles of microbe and cell cultivations. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 268 p.
13. Richards FJ. 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10(2):290-301.
14. Weimer PJ, Lopez-Guisa JM, French AD. 1990. Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(8):2421-2429.
15. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88(7):797-824.
16. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. 2005. Cellulose utilization by Clostridium thermocellum: Bioenergetics and hydrolysis product assimilation (vol 102, pg 7321, 2005). Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 102(26):9430.