Erratum to Erratum - Re-evaluating niche conservatism versus divergence in the Woodland Salamander genus Plethodon: A case study of the parapatric members of the Plethodon glutinosus species complex (Can. J. Zool., (2013), 91, 12 (883-892), 10.1139/cjz-2013-0097);Re-evaluating niche conservatism versus divergence in the Woodland Salamander genus Plethodon: A case study of the parapatric members of the Plethodon glutinosus species complex

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 883-892

  Wooten, Jessica A ^a   Camp, Carlos D ^b   Combs, Jonathon R ^a   Dulka, Eden ^a   Reist, Alexandra ^a   Walker, Donald M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY   (United States)

^b PIEDMONT COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological niche modeling; Niche conservatism; Niche divergence; Parapatry; Plethodon; Salamanders; SEEVA; Speciation

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; LIZARD; NICHE; PARAPATRY; PHYLOGENY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SPECIES COMPLEX; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WOODLAND;

PLETHODON; PLETHODON GLUTINOSUS; PLETHODONTIDAE; SALAMANDROIDEA;

EID: 84888246520     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: 14803283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2014-0011     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Adams, D.C. 2007. Organization of Plethodon salamander communities: guildbased community assembly. Ecology, 88: 1292-1299. doi:10.1890/06-0697. PMID:17536414.
2. Bazinet, A.L., and Cummings, M.P. 2008. The Lattice Project: a grid research and production environment combining multiple grid computing models. In Distributed & grid computing-science made transparent for everyone. Principles, applications and supporting communities. Edited by M.H.W. Weber. Tectum Publishing House, Marburg, Germany. pp. 2-13.
3. Bull, C.M. 1991. Ecology of parapatric distributions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 19-36. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.000315.
4. Conant, R., and Collins, C. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of eastern and central North America. Peterson field guide series. 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishers, Boston, Mass.
5. Crisp, M.D., and Cook, L.G. 2012. Phylogenetic niche conservatism: what are the underlying evolutionary and ecological causes? New Phytol. 196: 681-694. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04298.x. PMID:22943495.
6. Cummings, M.P., and Huskamp, J.C. 2005. Grid computing. Educause Rev. 40: 116-117.
7. Feder, M.E. 1983. Integrating the ecology and physiology of plethodontid salamanders. Herpetologica, 39: 291-310.
8. Frolking, S., Milliman, T., McDonald, K., Kimball, J., Zhao, M., and Fahnestock, M. 2006. Evaluation of the SeaWinds scatterometer for regional monitoring of vegetation phenology. J. Geophys. Res. 111. doi:10.1029/ 2005JD006588.
9. Graham, C.H., Ron, S.R., Santos, J.C., Schneider, C.J., and Moritz, C. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution, 58: 1781-1793. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x. PMID:15446430.
10. Griffis, M.R., and Jaeger, R.G. 1998. Competition leads to an extinction-prone species of salamander: interspecific territoriality in a metapopulation. Ecology, 79: 2494-2502. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2494:CLTAEP]2.0.CO;2.
11. Highton, R. 1989. Biochemical evolution in the slimy salamanders of the Plethodon glutinosus complex in the eastern United States. Part I. Geographic protein variation. Ill. Biol. Monogr. 57: 1-78.
12. Highton, R., and Peabody, R.B. 2000. Geographic protein variation and speciation in salamanders of the Plethodon jordani and Plethodon glutinosus complexes in the southern Appalachian Mountains with the description of four new species. In The biology of plethodontid salamanders. Edited by R.C. Bruce, R.G. Jaeger, and L.D. Houck. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. pp. 31-93.
13. Hijmans, R.J., Guarino, L., Cruz, M., and Rojas, E. 2001. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 127: 15-19.
14. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., and Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276.
15. Hua, X., and Wiens, J.J. 2013. How does climate influence speciation? Am. Nat. 182:1-12. doi:10.1086/670690. PMID:23778222.
16. Jaeger, R.G., and Forester, D.C. 1993. Social behavior of plethodontid salamanders. Herpetologica, 49: 163-175.
17. Knouft, J.H., Losos, J.B., Glor, R.E., and Kolbe, J.J. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of the niche in lizards of the Anolis sagrei group. Ecology, 87: S29-S38. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[29:PAOTEO]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16922300.
18. Kozak, K.H., and Wiens, J.J. 2006. Does niche conservatism promote speciation? A case study in North American salamanders. Evolution, 60: 2604-2621. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01893.x.
19. Kozak, K.H., and Wiens, J.J. 2010. Niche conservatism drives elevational diversity patterns in Appalachian salamanders. Am. Nat. 176: 40-54. doi:10.1086/ 653031. PMID:20497055.
20. Kozak, K.H., Weisrock, D.W., and Larson, A. 2006. Rapid lineage accumulation in a non-adaptive radiation: phylogenetic analysis of diversification rates in eastern North American woodland salamanders (Plethodontidae: Plethodon). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273: 539-546. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3326.
21. Kozak, K.H., Graham, C.H., and Wiens, J.J. 2008. Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 141-148. doi:10. 1016/j.tree.2008.02.001. PMID:18291557.
22. Lannoo, M. 2005. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley.
23. Lobo, J.M., Jimenez-Valverde, A., and Real, R. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 145-151. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x.
24. Losos, J.B. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett. 11: 995-1003. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x. PMID:18673385.
25. Mayr, E., Linsley, E.G., and Usinger, R.L. 1953. Methods and principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
26. McCormack, J.E., Zellmer, A.J., and Knowles, L.L. 2010. Does niche divergence accompany allopatric divergence in Aphelocoma jays as predicted under ecological speciation? Insights from tests with niche models. Evolution, 64: 1231-1244. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00900.x. PMID:19922442.
27. Myers, D.S., Bazinet, A.L., and Cummings, M.P. 2008. Expanding the reach of grid computing: combining Globus-and BOINC-based systems. In Grids for bioinformatics and computational biology. Wiley book series on parallel and distributed computing. Edited by E.-G. Talbi and A.Y. Zomaya. John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 71-85.
28. Narum, S.R. 2006. Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 7: 783-787. doi:10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y.
29. Nosil, P., Harmon, L.J., and Seehausen, O. 2009. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 145-156. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008. 10.011.
30. Peterson, A.T., Papes, M., and Soberon, J. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 213: 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008.
31. Petranka, J.W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
32. Phillips, S.J., Dudik, M., and Schapire, R.E. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, Alta., 4-8 July 2004. Edited by C.E. Brodley. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York. Vol. 69. pp. 83-99.
33. Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., and Schapire, R.E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190: 231-259. doi:10.1016/ j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
34. Pyron, R.A., and Burbrink, F.T. 2009. Lineage diversification in a widespread species: roles for niche divergence and conservatism in the common kingsnake, Lampropeltis getula. Mol. Ecol. 18: 3443-3457. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2009.04292.x. PMID:19659478.
35. Rissler, L.J., and Apodaca, J.J. 2007. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Syst. Biol. 56: 924-942. doi: 10.1080/10635150701703063.
36. Schluter, D. 2009. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science, 323: 737-741. doi:10.1126/science.1160006. PMID:19197053.
37. Schoener, T.W. 1968. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology, 49: 704-726. doi:10.2307/1935534.
38. Stockwell, D.R.B., and Peterson, A.T. 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148: 1-13. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X.
39. Struwe, L., Smouse, P.E., Heiberg, E., Haag, S., and Lathrop, R.G. 2011. Spatial evolutionary and ecological vicariance analysis (SEEVA), a novel approach to biogeography and speciation research, with an example from Brazilian Gentianaceae. J. Biogeogr. 38: 1841-1854. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02532.x.
40. Swenson, N.G., Enquist, B.J., Thompson, J., and Zimmerman, J.K. 2007. The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. Ecology, 88: 1770-1780. doi:10.1890/06-1499.1. PMID:17645023.
41. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4 [computer program]. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
42. Walker, D.M., Castlebury, L.A., Rossman, A.Y., and Struwe, L. 2013. Host conservatism or host specialization? Patterns of fungal diversification are influenced by host plant specificity in Ophiognomonia (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. In press [early view online]. doi:10.1111/bij. 12189.
43. Warren, D.L., Glor, R.E., and Turelli, M. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 62: 2868-2883. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x. PMID:18752605.
44. Wiens, J.J. 2004. Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution, 58: 193-197. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820. 2004.tb01586.x. PMID:15058732.
45. Wiens, J.J., and Graham, C.H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519-539. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431.
46. Wiens, J.J., Ackerly, D.D., Allen, A.P., Anacker, B.L., Buckley, L.B., Cornell, H.V., Damschen, E.I., Davies, T.J., Grytnes, J.A., Harrison, S.P., Hawkins, B.A., Holt, R.D., McCain, C.M., and Stephens, P.R. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1310-1324. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x. PMID:20649638.
47. Wooten, J.A., and Gibbs, H.L. 2012. Niche divergence and lineage diversification among closely related Sistrurus rattlesnakes. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 317-328. doi:10. 1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02426.x. PMID:22111895.
48. Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin.