Narrating impact assessment in the European Union

European Political Science

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 500-521

  Radaelli, Claudio M ^a   Dunlop, Claire A ^a   Fritsch, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Union; impact assessment; learning; policy narratives; regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888215082     PISSN: 16804333     EISSN: 16820983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/eps.2013.26     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adelle, C., Jordan, A. and Turnpenny, J. (2012) 'Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(3): 401-415
2. Alemanno, A. (2008) 'Quis custotet custodes dans le cadre de línitiative Mieux Légiférer? Une analyse des méchanismes de surveillance de la qualité réglementaire au sein de la Commission européenne et le Comité d'évaluation des analyses dímpact', Revue du Droit de l'Union Européenne 1: 43-87
3. Alemanno, A. (2011) á meeting of minds on impact assessment: When ex ante evaluation meets ex post judicial control', European Public Law 17(3): 467-487
4. Allio, L. (2008) The Emergence of Better Regulation in the European Union, London: King's College
5. Cecot, C., Hahn, R., Renda, A. and Schrefler, L. (2008) án evaluation of the quality of impact assessment in the European Union with lessons for the US and the EU', Regulation & Governance 2(4): 405-424
6. Dunlop, C.A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C.M. and Russel, D. (2012) 'The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases', Regulation & Governance 6: 23-45
7. European Commission. (2005a) 'Commission staff working paper', Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Community Strategy Concerning Mercury.
8. Extended Impact Assessment, SEC(2005) 101, Brussels, 28 January 2005
9. European Commission. (2005b) ímpact assessment guidelines', SEC(2005) 791, Brussels, 15 June 2005
10. European Commission. (2006) 'Commission staff working paper', Annex to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC Relating to Restrictions on the Marketing of Certain Measuring Devices Containing Mercury, SEC(2006) 194, Brussels, 21 February 2006
11. European Commission. (2007a) 'Commission staff working document', Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Possibilities of Further Improving the Environmental Characteristics of Recreational Craft Engines. Impact Assessment, SEC(2007) 770, Brussels, 11 June 2007
12. European Commission. (2007b) 'Commission staff working document', Impact Assessment Accompanying the White Paper on Sport, SEC(2007) 932/2, Brussels
13. European Commission. (2008) 'Commission staff working document', Accompanying Document to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning Trade in Seal Products. Impact Assessment on the Potential Impact of a Ban of Products Derived from Seal Species, SEC(2008) 2290, Brussels, 23 July 2008
14. European Commission. (2009a) 'Commission staff working document', Accompanying Document to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Critical Information Infrastructure Protection: Protecting Europe from Large Scale Cyber Attacks and Disruptions: Enhancing Preparedness, Security and Resilience, SEC(2009) 399, Brussels, 30 March 2009
15. European Commission. (2009b) 'Commission staff working document', Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on a European Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, Impact Assessment, SEC(2009) 1040 final, Brussels, 22 July 2009
16. European Commission. (2009c) ímpact assessment guidelines', 15 January 2009
17. European Commission. (2010) 'Smart regulation in the European Union', Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 0543, Brussels, 8 October 2010
18. European Commission. (2011a) 'Commission staff working document', Impact Assessment. Accompanying Document to the Proposal for a Council Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), SEC(2011) 315 final, Brussels, 16 March 2011
19. European Commission. (2011b) 'Commission staff working paper', Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document. Proposal for a Council Directive on a Common System of Financial Transaction Tax and Amending Directive 2008/7/EC, SEC(2011) 1102 final, Brussels, 28 September 2011
20. European Commission. (2011c) 'Smart regulation in the European Union', Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Updated, Brussels
21. European Commission. (2012) ímpact assessment board report for 2011', SEC(2012) 101 final, Brussels, 1 February 2012
22. Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H. (eds.) (2012) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice, Durham: Duke University Press
23. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
24. Fritsch, O., Radaelli, C., Schrefler, L. and Renda, A. (forthcoming) 'Comparing the content of regulatory impact assessments in the UK and the EU', Public Money & Management
25. Goffman, E. (1959) Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday
26. Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (eds.) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
27. Jones, M.D. and McBeth, M.K. (2010) á narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?' Policy Studies Journal 38(2): 329-353
28. Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2004) 'EU Member States and the Prodi Commission', in D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.) The Changing European Commission, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 89-104
29. Meuwese, A.C.M. (2008) Impact Assessment in EU Lawmaking, The Hague: Kluwer Law International
30. Nicolaidis, K. and Howse, R. (2002) 'This is my EUtopia y': Narrative as power', Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 767-792
31. Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B. and Russel, D. (2008) 'The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union', Policy Sciences 41(4): 335-355
32. Nowlin, M. (2011) 'Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends', Policy Studies Journal 39(S1): 41-60
33. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2009) Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
34. Radaelli, C.M. (1999) 'Harmful tax competition in the European Union: Policy narratives and advocacy coalitions', Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 661-682
35. Radaelli, C.M. (2010) 'Rationality, power, management and symbols: Four images of regulatory impact assessment', Scandinavian Political Studies 33(2): 164-188
36. Radaelli, C.M. and Meuwese, A.C.M. (2010) 'Hard questions, hard solutions: Proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU', West European Politics 33(1): 136-153
37. Renda, A. (2006) Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies
38. Roe, E.M. (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press
39. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) 'The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union', International Organization 55(1): 47-80
40. Schmidt, V.A. (2006) 'Procedural democracy in the EU: The Europeanization of national and sectoral policy-making processes', Journal of European Public Policy 13(5): 670-691
41. Schmidt, V.A. (2008) 'Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse', Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303-326
42. Schrefler, L. (2010) 'The usage of scientific knowledge by independent regulatory agencies', Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 23(2): 309-330
43. Searle, J. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press
44. Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K. and Hathaway, P.L. (2011) 'Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion', Politics & Policy 39(3): 373-400
45. Stone, D.A. (1988) Policy Paradox and Political Reason, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman
46. The Evaluation Partnership. (2007) 'Evaluation of the commission's impact assessment system', Annexes to the Final Report, The Evaluation Partnership, Richmond, April 2007
47. Torriti, J. (2010) ímpact assessment and the liberalization of the EU energy markets: Evidencebased policy-making or policy-based evidence-making?' Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 1065-1081
48. Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
49. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R. and Janik, A. (1984) An Introduction to Reasoning, London: Collier Macmillan
50. Turnpenny, J., Radaelli, C.M., Jordan, A. and Jacob, K. (2009) 'The policy and politics of policy appraisal: Emerging trends and new directions', Journal of European Public Policy 16(4): 640-653