Rationality, Power, Management and Symbols: Four Images of Regulatory Impact Assessment

Scandinavian Political Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 164-188

  Radaelli, Claudio M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953183173     PISSN: 00806757     EISSN: 14679477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allio L. The Emergence of Better Regulation in the European Union. 2009, PhD dissertation, King's College, University of London
2. Arter D. The Prime Minister in Scandinavia: " Superstar" or Supervisor? Journal of Legislative Studies 2004, 10(2-3):109-27.
3. Baldwin R. Is Better Regulation Smarter Regulation? Public Law 2005, 485-511. Autumn
4. Bergman T. Sweden: From Separation of Power to Parliamentary Supremacy - and Back Again? Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies 2003, Strøm KMüller W CBergman T. in, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press
5. Brinderkrantz AS, Christensen J G. Governing Danish Agencies by Contract: From Negotiated Freedom to Shadow of Hierarchy. Journal of Public Policy 2009, 29(1):55-78.
6. Brunsson N. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations 1989, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons
7. Christensen J G. Political Responsiveness in a Merit Bureaucracy: Denmark. Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control 2004, Peters G BPierre J. in, eds, London, Routledge
8. Cecot C, Hahn R W, Renda A, Schrefler L. An Evaluation of the Quality of Impact Assessment in the European Union with Lessons for the US and the EU. Regulation and Governance 2008, 2(4):405-24.
9. Christensen T, Laegreid P. New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice 2001, eds., Aldershot, Ashgate
10. Coglianese C. The Rhetoric and Reality of Regulatory Reform. Yale Journal on Regulation 2008, 25:85-95.
11. Damgaard E. Denmark: Delegation and Accountability in Minority Situations. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies 2003, Strøm KMüller W CBergman T. in, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press
12. De Francesco F. Pre-requisites of Adoption and Patterns of Diffusion: The Case of Regulatory Impact Analysis in European Union and OECD Member States. 2008, Paper presented at the Political Studies Association 58th annual conference, University of Swansea, 1-3 April
13. De Francesco F. Diffusion of RIA among OECD and EU Member States: An Event History Analysis. 2009, Paper presented at the Advanced Colloquium on Regulatory Reform, University of Exeter, 6-7 July
14. European Governance: A White Paper 2001, European Commission, Brussels, European Commission
15. Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union 2005, European Commission, COM(2005) 97 final, Brussels, European Commission
16. Furubo J-E, Sandahl R. A Diffusion Perspective on Global Developments in Evaluation. International Atlas of Evaluation 2002, Furubo J-E, Rist R CSandahl R. in, eds, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction
17. Graham J D. The Evolving Role of the US Office of Management and Budget in Regulatory Policy 2007, WP07-04, Washington, DC, AEI-Brookings Joint Center on Regulation
18. Gualmini E. Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration 2008, 86(1):75-94.
19. Hahn R W, Tetlock P C. Has Economic Analysis Improved Regulatory Decisions? Journal of Economic Perspectives 2008, 22(1):67-84.
20. Hansen H F, Holm Pedersen L. The Dynamics of Regulatory Reform. Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State 2006, Christensen T, Laegreid P. in, eds, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
21. Hansen H F, Rieper O. The Politics of Evidence-based Policy-making: The Case of Denmark. 2008, Paper delivered to the ECPR joint sessions of workshops, Rennes, 11-16 April
22. Hertin J. The Production and Use of Knowledge in Regulatory Impact Assessment: An Empirical Analysis. 2009, FFU Report 01-2009. Berlin: FFU
23. Hood C, Peters G. The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2004, 14(3):267-82.
24. Getting Results: The Better Regulation Executive and the Impact of the Regulatory Reform Agenda 2008, House of Commons, Paper HC 474-I, London, Stationery Office
25. Jacob K. Improving the Practice of Impact Assessment 2008, Berlin, EVIA Consortium
26. Jacobs S. RIA in Regulatory Process, Method and Cooperation: Lessons for Canada from International Trends 2006, Ottawa, Jacobs & Associates
27. Jalilian H, Kirkpatrick C, Parker D. The Impact of Regulation on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Cross-country Analysis. World Development 2007, 35(1):87-103.
28. Kagan E. Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review 2001, 114:2245-2385.
29. Majone G D. Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 1999, 1(3):309-24.
30. McCubbins M D, Noll R G, Weingast B R. Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies. Virginia Law Review 1989, 431-82. March
31. McGarity T O. Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy 1991, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
32. Meuwese A C M. Impact Assessment in EU Law-making 2008, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International
33. Moran M. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-innovation 2003, Oxford, Oxford University Press
34. Nilsson M. The Use and Non-use of Policy Appraisal in Public Policy Making: An Analysis of Three European Countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences 2008, 41(4):335-55.
35. Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance 2002, OECD, Paris, OECD
36. Comparing Administrative Burdens across Countries 2007a, OECD, Paris, OECD
37. Government Capacity to Assure High Quality Regulation in Sweden 2007b, OECD, Paris, OECD
38. Peters G B, Pierre J. Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences. Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control 2004, in, London, Routledge
39. Pierre J. Politicization of the Swedish Civil Service: A Necessary Evil - or Just Evil? Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control 2004, Peters G BPierre J. in, eds, London, Routledge
40. Pollack M. Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 1997, 51(1):99-134.
41. Pollitt C. Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies', Journal of Public Administration. Research and Theory 2005, 16(1):25-44.
42. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis 2004, 2nd, edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press
43. Posner E A. Controlling Agencies with Cost-benefit Analysis: A Positive Political Theory Perspective. University of Chicago Law Review 2001, 68:1137.
44. Power M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification 1999, 2nd, edn., Oxford, Oxford University Press
45. Radaelli C M. The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best-practice or Lesson Drawing? European Journal of Political Research 2004, 43(5):723-47.
46. Radaelli C M. Desperately Seeking Regulatory Impact Assessments: Diary of a Reflective Researcher. Evaluation 2009, 15(1):31-48.
47. Renda A. Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State 2005, Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies
48. Russel D, Jordan A. Joining-up or Pulling Apart? The Use of Appraisal to Coordinate Policy-making for Sustainable Development. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(5):1201-16.
49. Shapiro S. Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Regulatory Reforms: What Questions Need to be Asked? 2007, Washington, DC, AEI-Brooking Joint Center on Regulation
50. Stevens A, Stevens H. Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union 2000, Basingstoke, Palgrave
51. Timmermans A, Andeweg R B. The Netherlands: Rules and Mores in Delegation and Accountability Relationships. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies 2003, Strøm K, Müller W CBergman T. in, eds, Oxford, Oxford University Press
52. Turnpenny J. The Policy and Politics of Appraisal: Emerging Trends and New Directions. Journal of European Public Policy 2009, 16(4):640-53.
53. Vibert F. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers 2007, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
54. Wegrich K. The Administrative Burden Reduction Policy in Europe: Comparing Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion 2009, CARR Discussion Paper 52, London, London School of Economics
55. Weick K. Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 1976, 21:1-19.
56. West W F. The Institutionalization of Regulatory Review: Organizational Stability and Responsive Competence at OIRA. Presidential Studies Quarterly 2005, 35(1):76-93.