Addressing challenges of conducting quality mixed methods studies in higher education

International Perspectives on Higher Education Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2013, Pages 133-153

  Papadimitriou, Antigoni ^a   Ivankova, Nataliya ^b   Hurtado, Sylvia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888186460     PISSN: 14793628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1479-3628(2013)0000009011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
2. Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Semptik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261-276.
3. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Dellinger, A. B., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 309.
10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3d ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Gasiewksi, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229-261.Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Hurtado, S, (2012). Reflections of a mixed methods researcher: Getting educated and educating others in defining quality in mixed methods. Paper presented in the session of Quality in Mixed Methods at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
14. Ivankova, N. (2013). Implementing quality criteria in designing and conducting a sequential QUAN-QUAL mixed methods study of student engagement with learning applied research methods online. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. doi: 10.1177/1558 689813487945
15. Ivankova, N., & Kawamura, Y. (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in social, behavioral, and health sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Ivankova, N., & Stick, S. (2007). Students persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93-135. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
17. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. (2006). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20.
18. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
19. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). London: Collier MacMillan.
21. Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
22. OCathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Health Service and Research Policy, 13(2), 92-98.
23. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
24. Papadimitriou, A. (2011). The enigma of quality in Greek higher education: A mixed methods study of introducing quality management into Greek higher education. Enshcede, the Netherlands: University of Twente, CHEPS.
25. Plano Clark, V., Leslie-Pelecky, D., & Garrett, A. (2008). Illustrations of three strategies for merging quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
26. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3.
27. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). Envisioning the future stewards of the socialbehavioral research enterprise. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 291-295.
28. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality in inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 101-119). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
31. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Ursin, J. (2005). Whys and ways of internal quality assurance in Finnish universities. Paper presented at the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers (CHER), Jyva skyla, Finland.