Implementing Quality Criteria in Designing and Conducting a Sequential QUAN → QUAL Mixed Methods Study of Student Engagement With Learning Applied Research Methods Online

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-51

  Ivankova, Nataliya V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

inferences; mixed methods research; sequential design; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891109221     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689813487945     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arbaugh J. B.,Cleveland-Innes M.,Diaz S. R.,Garrison D. R.,Ice P.,Richardson J. C.,Swan K. P.Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample.Internet and Higher Education. 2008;11:133-136.
2. Perspectives on higher education in the digital age. Beaudoin M. F., ed. New York, NY: Nova Science; 2006:.
3. Bryman A.,Becker S.,Semptik J.Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy.International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2008;11:261-276.
4. Creswell J. W.Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:.
5. Creswell J. W.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:45-68.
6. Creswell J. W.Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall; 2012:.
7. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:.
8. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011:.
9. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.,Garrett A.Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Bergman M. M., ed. London, England: Sage; 2008:66-83.
10. Dellinger A. B.,Leech N. L.Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (4): 309-332.
11. Glaser B.,Strauss A.The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967:.
12. Greene J. C.Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
13. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse programs. Greene J. C.Caracelli V. J., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997:.
14. Hofmann D. W.Internet-based distance learning in higher education.Tech Directions. 2002;62 (1): 28-32.
15. Ivankova N. V.Teaching and learning mixed methods research in computer-mediated environment: Educational gains and challenges.International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. 2010;4 (1): 49-65.
16. Ivankova N. V.,Creswell J. W.,Stick S.Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice.Field Methods. 2006;18 (1): 3-20.
17. Ivankova N.,Kawamura Y.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in social, behavioral, and health sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:581-611.
18. Ivankova N.,Stick S.Training higher education policy makers and leaders: A graduate program perspective. Wright D.Miller M., ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2007:75-96.
19. Kember D.Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology; 1995:.
20. Leech N. L.,Dellinger A. B.,Brannagan K. B.,Tanaka H.Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2010;4 (1): 17-31.
21. Lincoln Y. S.,Guba E. G.Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985:.
22. Maxwell J. A.,Mittapalli K.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 145-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:145-167.
23. Miles M. B.,Huberman A. M.Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. 1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:.
24. Morse J. M.,Niehaus L.Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009:.
25. Nunnally J. C.,Bernstein I.Psychometric theory. 1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994:.
26. O'Cathain A.Sage handbook of mixed methods in the social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:531-555.
27. Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Johnson R. B.The validity issue in mixed research.Research in the Schools. 2006;13 (1): 48-63.
28. Papadimitriou A.,Ivankova N.,Hurtado S.Theory and method in higher education research. Huisman J.Tight M., ed. Bingley, England: Emerald Group; in press:.
29. Patton M. Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001:.
30. Plano Clark V.,Badiee M.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 275-304). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:275-304.
31. Tashakkori A.,Creswell J.The new era of mixed methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (1): 3-8.
32. Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:.
33. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:.
34. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
35. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2010:1-41.
36. Thorndike R. M.,Thorndike-Christ T. N.Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. 2011). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2011:.