Repeated acidosis challenges and live yeast supplementation shape rumen microbiota and fermentations and modulate inflammatory status in sheep

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1910-1920

  Silberberg, M ^a,b   Chaucheyras Durand, F ^c,d   Commun, L ^a,e   Mialon, M M ^a,b   Monteils, V ^a,b,d,f,g   Mosoni, P ^d   Morgavi, D P ^a,b   Martin, C ^a,b  

^a UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^c LALLEMAND SAS   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e VETAGRO SUP   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

inflammatory status; rumen acidosis; rumen fermentations; rumen microbiota; sheep

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); OVIS ARIES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ACIDOSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; FERMENTATION; MALE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMINANT STOMACH; SHEEP; YEAST;

ACIDOSIS; ANIMALS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; FERMENTATION; MALE; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMEN; SHEEP; YEASTS;

EID: 84888136624     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113001705     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AlZahal O, Kebreab E, France J and McBride BW 2007. A mathematical approach to predicting biological values from ruminal pH measurements. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3777-3785.
2. AOAC 1990. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analitical Chemistry, Arlington, V.A.
3. Brossard L, Martin C and Michalet-Doreau B 2003. Ruminal fermentative parameters and blood acido-basic balance changes during the onset and recovery of induced latent acidosis in sheep. Animal Research 52, 513-530.
4. Brossard L, Martin C, Chaucheyras-Durand F and Michalet-Doreau B 2004. Protozoa involved in butyric rather than lactic fermentative pattern during latent acidosis in sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 195-206.
5. Brossard L, Chaucheyras-Durand F,Michalet-Doreau B andMartin C 2006. Dose effect of live yeasts on rumen microbial communities and fermentations during butyric latent acidosis in sheep: New type of interaction. Animal Science 82, 829-836.
6. BryantM and Burkey L 1953. Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 36, 205-217.
7. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND and Bach A 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present, and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 1-26.
8. Chaucheyras F and Fonty G 2006. Effects and modes of action of live yeasts in the rumen. Biologia, Bratislava 61, 741-750.
9. Clarke KR and Owens NJ 1983. A simple and versatile micro-computer program for the determination of "Most Probable Number". Journal of Microbiological Methods 1, 133-137.
10. Commun L, Silberberg M, Mialon MM, Martin C and Veissier I 2012. Behavioural adaptations of sheep to repeated acidosis challenges and effect of yeast supplementation. Animal 6, 2011-2022.
11. Denman SE and McSweeney CS 2006. Development of a real-Time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. Fems Microbiology Ecology 58, 572-582.
12. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C and Sauvant D 2009. Meta-Analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1620-1632.
13. Dohme F, DeVries TJ and Beauchemin KA 2008. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Ruminal pH. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3554-3567.
14. Edwards JE, Huws SA, Kim EJ and Kingston-Smith AH 2007. Characterization of the dynamics of initial bacterial colonization of nonconserved forage in the bovine rumen-corrigendum. Fems Microbiology Ecology 62, 1-2.
15. Edwards JE, Huws SA, Kim EJ and Kingston-Smith AH 2007. Characterization of the dynamics of initial bacterial colonization of nonconserved forage in the bovine rumen. Fems Microbiology Ecology 62, 323-335.
16. Emmanuel DGV, Madsen KL, Churchill TA, Dunn SM and Ametaj BN 2007. Acidosis and lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli B:055 cause hyperpermeability of rumen and colon tissues. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5552-5557.
17. Garner MR, Flint JF and Russell JB 2002. Allisonella histaminiformans gen. nov., sp. nov. A novel bacterium that produces histamine, utilizes histidine as its sole energy source, and could play a role in bovine and equine laminitis. Systematic Applied Microbiology 25, 498-506.
18. Gifford CA, Holland BP, Mills RL, Maxwell CL, Farney JK, Terrill SJ, Step DL, Richards CJ, Robles LOB and Krehbiel CR 2012. Growth and development symposium: Impacts of inflammation on cattle growth and carcass merit. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1438-1451.
19. Gozho GN, Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Kennedy AD and Wittenberg KM 2005. Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1399-1403.
20. INRA 2007. Valeur alimentaire des fourrages et des matières premières: Tables et prévisions. In Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins (p. 167. Quae. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.
21. INRA 2007. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. INRA, Versailles.
22. Keunen JE, Plaizier JC, Kyriazakis L, Duffield TF, Widowski TM, Lindinger MI and McBride BW 2002. Effects of a subacute ruminal acidosis model on the diet selection of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3304-3313.
23. Khafipour E, Krause DO and Plaizier JC 2009. A grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1060-1070.
24. Khafipour E, Krause DO and Plaizier JC 2009. Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1712-1724.
25. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC and Krause DO 2009. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Applied Environmental Microbiology 75, 7115-7124.
26. Kleen JL and Cannizzo C 2012. Incidence, prevalence and impact of SARA in dairy herds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 4-8.
27. Krause KM, Garrett R and Oetzel GR 2006. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 215-236.
28. Lettat A, Noziere P, Silberberg M, Morgavi DP, Berger C and Martin C 2010. Experimental feed induction of ruminal lactic, propionic, or butyric acidosis in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3041-3046.
29. Li RW, Wu ST, Baldwin RL, Li WZ and Li CJ 2012. Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate. PLoS One 7.
30. Michelland RJ, Combes S, Monteils V, Cauquil L, Gidenne T and Fortun-Lamothe L 2009. Molecular analysis of the bacterial community in digestive tract of rabbit. Anaerobe 16, 61-65.
31. Monteils V, Rey M, Silberberg M, Cauquil L and Combes S 2012. Modification of activities of the ruminal ecosystem and its bacterial and protozoan composition during repeated dietary changes in cows. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4431-4440.
32. Morgavi DP, Boudra H, Jouany JP and Graviou D 2003. Prevention of patulin toxicity on rumen microbial fermentation by SH-containing reducing agents. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 51, 6906-6910.
33. Mosoni P, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Bera-Maillet C and Forano E 2007. Quantification by real-Time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: Effect of a yeast additive. Journal of Applied Microbiology 103, 2676-2685.
34. Mosoni P, Martin C, Forano E and Morgavi DP 2011. Long-Term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 89, 783-791.
35. Nagaraja TG and Titgemeyer EC 2007. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: The current microbiological and nutritional outlook. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. 1), E17-E38.
36. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN and McBride BW 2008. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: The physiological causes, incidence and consequences. The Veterinary Journal 176, 21-31.
37. Stevenson DMand Weimer PJ 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-Time PCR. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 75, 165-174.
38. Zebeli Q and Metzler-Zebeli BU 2012. Interplay between rumen digestive disorders and diet-induced inflammation in dairy cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 93, 1099-1108.
39. Zebeli Q, Metzler-Zebeli BU and Ametaj BN 2012. Meta-Analysis reveals threshold level of rapidly fermentable dietary concentrate that triggers systemic inflammation in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 2662-2672.