Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive ulmus pumila (Ulmaceae) and native U. Rubra

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1116-1128

  Zalapa, Juan E ^a   Brunet, Johanne ^a   Guries, Raymond P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dutch elm disease; Hybrid zones; Invasive species; Microsatellites; Red elm; Siberian elm; Species specific markers

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INTROGRESSION; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ULMACEAE; ULMUS; ULMUS PUMILA;

EID: 67650145856     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800334     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BAACK, E. J., AND L H RIESEBERG. 2007. A genomic view of intro- gression and hybrid speciation. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17: 513-518.
2. BACILIERI R A DUCOUSSO , R. J. PETIT AND A KREMER. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50: 900-908.
3. BRASIER, C. M. 1988. Ophiostoma ulmi , cause of Dutch elm disease. Advances in Plant Pathology 6: 207-221.
4. BRASIER, C. M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115: 151-161.
5. BURGESSM K.S., MM ORGAN L. DEVERNO AND B.C.HUSBAND. 2005 . Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species ( M. alba, M. rubra ) that differ in abundance. Molecular Ecology 14: 3471-3483.
6. COGOLLUDO-AGUSTÍN, M.A., D. AGÚNDEZ, AND L. GIL. 2000. Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157-166.
7. COLLADA, C., P. FUENTES- UTRILLA L GIL AND M. T. CERVERA 2004 . Characterization of microsatellite loci in Ulmus minor Miller and cross-amplifi cation in U. glabra Hudson and U. laevis Pall. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 731-732.
8. COLLIN, E. 2002. Strategies and guidelines for the conservation of the ge- netic resources of Ulmus spp. In Turok, J, G. Eriksson, K. Russell, and S. Borelli [eds.], Noble Hardwoods Network, 50- 67, Report of the fourth meeting, September 1999, Gmunden, Austria, and the fifth meeting, May 2001, Blessington, Ireland. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
9. DAEHLER C., AND D. STRONG. 1997. Hybridization between introduced smooth cordgrass ( Spartina alterniflora ; Poaceae) and native California cordgrass ( S. foliosa ) in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. American Journal of Botany 84: 607-611.
10. DING, J., R. REARDON, Y. WU, H. ZHENG, AND W. FU. 2006. Biological control of invasive plants through collaboration between China and the United States of America: A perspective. Biological Invasions 8: 1439-1450.
11. ELLSTRAND, N. C., AND D E LAM. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
12. ELLSTRAND, N. C., AND K. SCHIERENBECK. 2000. Hybridization as a stim- ulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7043-7050.
13. EXCOFFIER, L., P. E. SMOUSE AND J. M. QUATTRO. 1992. Analysis of molec- ular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
14. GOODALL-COPESTAKE , W. P. , M. L. H OLLINGSWORTH, P. M. HOLLINGSWORTH G. I. JENKINS AND E C OLLIN. 2005. Molecular markers and ex situ con- servation of the European elms ( Ulmus spp.). Biological Conservation 122: 537-546.
15. HEDGE, S. G., J. D. NASON, J. M. CLEGG AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 2006. The evolution of California ' s wild radish has resulted in the extinction of its progenitors. Evolution 60: 1187-1197.
16. KEIM, P., K. N. PAIGE T. G. WHITHAM, AND K. G. LARK. 1989. Genetic analysis of an interspecifi c hybrid swarm of Populus : Occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123: 557-565.
17. LESTER, D. T., AND E. B. SMALLEY. 1972a. Response of Ulmus pumila and U. pumilia × rubra hybrids to inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 62: 848-852.
18. LESTER, D. T., AND E. B. SMALLEY. 1972b. Variation in ornamental traits and disease tolerance among crosses of Ulmus pumila, U. rubra and putative natural hybrids. Silvae Genetica 21: 193-197.
19. LONDO, J. P. , AND B A SCHAAL. 2007. Origins and population genetics of weedy red rice in the USA. Molecular Ecology 16: 4523-4535.
20. MACHON, N., M. LEFRANC, I. BILGER, S.J. MAZER AND A. SARR. 1997. Allozyme variation in Ulmus species from France: analysis of differentiation. Heredity 78: 12-20.
21. MITTEMPERGHER, L., AND A. SANTINI. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 161-177.
22. MOODY M AND D LES. 2007. Geographic distribution and genotypic composition of invasive hybrid watermilfoil ( Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum ) populations in North America. Biological Invasions 9: 559-570.
23. PEAKALL , R. , AND P. E. SMOUSE. 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
24. PRENTIS, P. J., E. M. WHITE, I. J. RADFORD, A. J. LOWE AND A. R. CLARKE 2007 . Can hybridization cause local extinction: A case for demo- graphic swamping of the Australian native Senecio pinnatifolius by the invasive Senecio madagascariensis? New Phytologist 176: 902-912.
25. PRITCHARD J. K., M. STEPHENS AND P. DONNELLY. 2000. Inference of popula- tion structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
26. RHYMER, J. M., AND D SIMBERLOFF. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83-109.
27. RIESEBERG L. H., S. ZONA, L. ABERBOM AND T. D. MARTIN 1989 . Hybridization in the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Conservation Biology 3: 52-58.
28. RIESEBERG L. H., O. RAYMOND, D. M. ROSENTHAL Z. LAI K LIVINGSTONE T. NAKAZATO , J. L. DURPHY ET AL. 2003. Major ecological transi- tions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
29. SAKAI,A.K.,F.W.ALLENDORF J. S. HOLT, D. M. LODGE,J.MOLOFSKY, K. A. WITH, S. BAUGHMAN, ET AL. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 305-332.
30. SANTAMOUR, F. S. 1972. Interspecifi c hybridization with fall- and spring- flowering elms. Forest Science 18: 283-289.
31. SANTINI, A., N. LA PORTA, L. GHELARDINI, AND L. MITTEMPERGHER. 2008 . Breeding against Dutch elm disease adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Euphytica 163: 45-56.
32. SMALLEY, E. B., AND R. P. GURIES. 1993. Breeding elms for toler- ance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 3 1 : 325-352.
33. SMOUSE, P. E., AND R. PEAKALL. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 8 2 : 561-573.
34. STRAUSS, S. Y., J. A. LAU, AND S. P. CARROLL. 2006. Evolutionary re- sponses of natives to introduced species: What do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecology Letters 9: 357-374.
35. TOWNSEND A. M. 1975 . Crossability patterns and morphological variation among elm species and hybrids. Silvae Genetica 24: 18-23.
36. USDA, NRCS. 2002. PLANTS Database, version 3.5 [online, website http://plants.usda.gov ]. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
37. VILA, M., E. WEBER AND C. M. D'ANTONIO. 2000. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biological Invasions 2: 207-217.
38. W ARE, G. H. 1995. Little-known elms from China: Landscape tree pos- sibilities. Journal of Arboriculture 21: 284-288.
39. WHITELEY, R. E., S. BLACK-SAMUELSSON AND D CLAPHAM 2003 . Development of microsatellite markers for the European white elm ( Ulmus laevis Pall.) and cross-species amplifi cation within the genus Ulmus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 598-600.
40. WIEGREFE, S. J., K. J. SYTSMA, AND R. P. GURIES. 1994. Phylogeny of elms ( Ulmus , Ulmaceae): Molecular evidence for a sectional classifi- cation. Systematic Botany 19: 590-612.
41. WOLFE, L., A. BLAIR, AND B. PENNA. 2007. Does intraspecific hybrid- ization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness?: An experimental test. Biological Invasions 9: 515-521.
42. WYMAN, D. 1951. Elms grown in America. Arnoldia 11: 79-93.
43. ZALAPA , J. E., J. BRUNET AND R. P. GURIES. 2008a. Isolation and charac- terization of microsatellite markers for red elm ( Ulmus rubra Muhl.) and cross-species amplifi cation with Siberian elm ( Ulmus pumila L.). Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 109-112.
44. ZALAPA, J. E., J. BRUNET AND R. P. GURIES. 2008b. Genetic diversity and relationships among Dutch elm disease-tolerant Ulmus pumila L. ac- cessions from China. Genome 51: 492-500.