Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2008, Pages

  Schaeren, Stefan ^a   Broger, Ivan ^b   Jeanneret, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Decompression; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Dynamic stabilization; Dynesys; Spinal stenosis

Indexed keywords

OPIATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE SCREW; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DISEASE COURSE; DONOR SITE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LONG TERM CARE; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MEMBRANE RUPTURE; MORBIDITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; WALKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 60549117158     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d2435     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Rosenberg NJ. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:467-74.
2. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine 2007;32:120-5.
3. Herkowitz HN. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 1995;20:1084-90.
4. Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg 2000;93:194-8.
5. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1986;11:107-10.
6. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, et al. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:809-16.
7. Lombardi JS, Wiltse LL, Reynolds J, et al. Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 1985;10:821-7.
8. Bassewitz H, Herkowitz H. Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: current concepts of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;384:54-60.
9. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, et al. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:461-72.
10. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:802-8.
11. Nork SE, Hu SS, Workman KL, et al. Patient outcomes after decompression and instrumented posterior spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 1999-24:561-9.
12. Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. II. Surgical treatment. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1991;17:467-77.
13. Fischgrund JS. The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 2004;29:173-4.
14. Phillips FM. The argument for noninstrumented posterolateral fusion for patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2004;29:170-2.
15. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Short S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine 1994;19:2256S-2265S.
16. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997;22:2807-12.
17. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004;29:726-33.
18. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 1995;20:1055-60.
19. Guigui P, Wodecki P, Bizot P, et al. [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000;86:546-57.
20. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 1997;22:1123-31.
21. Dubois G, de Germay B, Schaerer NS, et al. Dynamic neutralization: a new concept for restabilization of the Spine. In: Spzalski M, Gunzburg R, Pope MH, eds. Lumbar Segmental Instability. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott, Williams and Wilkins; 1999:233-40.
22. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M. Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:127-32.
23. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, et al. Clinical experience with the dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 2005;30:324-31.
24. Cakir B, Ulmar B, Koepp H, et al. [Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003;141:418-24.
25. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S170-S178.
26. Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2006;31:442-9.
27. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 1986;11:601-6.
28. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, et al. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 1996;21:741-9.
29. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 1995;8:464-73.
30. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, et al. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 1999;24:1721-7.
31. Guigui P, Chopin D. [Assessment of the use of the Graf ligamentoplasty in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Apropos of a series of 26 patients]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1994;80:681-8.
32. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. Non-fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis using artificial ligament stabilization: surgical indication and clinical results. Spine 2005;30:588-92.
33. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Min-Hanjani S, et al. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:267-72.
34. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:418-23.
35. Wild A, Jaeger M, Bushe C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of Graf's dynamic spine stabilisation system ex vivo. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2001;46:290-4.
36. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:392-400.
37. Hambly MF, Wiltse LL, Raghavan N, et al. The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion. Spine 1998;23:1785-92.
38. Penta M, Sandhu A, Fraser RD. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1995;20:743-7.
39. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, et al. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 2007;32:685-90.
40. Pellise F, Hernandez A, Vidal X, et al. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 2007;32:574-9.
41. Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 2000;25:1132-9.