Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion: The impact of anterior column support: A randomized clinical trial with an eight-to thirteen-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 22, 2010, Pages 1955-1964

  Videbaek, Tina S ^a   Egund, Niels ^a   Christensen, Finn B ^a   Grethe Jurik, Anne ^a   Bünger, Cody E ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

adjacent segment degeneration; anterior interbody fusion; endplate changes; longterm MRI follow up; outcome; randomized prospective clinical trial

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE ENDING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SPONDYLOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149232417     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e57269     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29:1938-44.
2. Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, et al. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 2001;23:483-91.
3. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine 1994;19:1745-51.
4. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 1999;28:336-40.
5. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 1984;9:574-81.
6. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 1996; 21:970-81.
7. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 2002;27:2674-83.
8. Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, et al. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine 2006;31:1351-7.
9. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 2008;33:1701-7.
10. Soegaard R, Bunger CE, Christiansen T, et al. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain. Spine 2007;32:2405-14.
11. Videbaek TS, Christensen FB, Soegaard R, et al. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2006;31:2875-80.
12. Lawlis GF, Cuencas R, Selby D, et al. The development of the Dallas pain questionnaire. An assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behavior. Spine 1989;14:511-6.
13. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
14. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25: 2940-52.
15. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, et al. Low back pain rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 1994;57:317-26.
16. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25:3130-9.
17. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001;26:1873-8.
18. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 2001;26:E93-113.
19. Ross JS. Degenerative disease and inflammatory arthritides. In: Diagnostic Imaging: Spine. 1st ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys; 2005:2-3.
20. Sirvanci M, Bhatia M, Ganiyusufoglu KA, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry disability index and MR imaging. Eur Spine J 2008;17:679-85.
21. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, et al. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:193-9.
22. Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine 2005;30:1173-80.
23. Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, et al. A three-year follow-up of lumbar spine endplate (Modic) changes. Spine 2006;31:1714-8.
24. Jensen TS, Karppinen J, Sorensen JS, et al. Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1407-22.
25. Videman T, Battie MC, Gill K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and their relationships in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Insights into the etiopathogenesis of spinal degeneration. Spine 1995;20:928-35.
26. Albert HB, Manniche C. Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2007;16:977-82.
27. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 2004;4:190S-4S.
28. Ekman P,Moller H, HedlundR. The long-term effectof posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study. Spine J 2005;5:36-44.
29. Kumar MN, Jacquot F, HallH. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 2001;10:309-13.
30. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 1987;12:97-104.
31. Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 2004;29:1535-40.
32. Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. Eur Spine J 2007;16:2152-8.
33. Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28:2546-50.
34. Wai EK, Santos ER, Morcom RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2006;31:1952-6.