Minimally invasive muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy: Technique and comparison with conventional subperiosteal microdiscectomy during the early postoperative period

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 225-229

  Park, Beom Seok ^a   Kwon, Young Joon ^a   Won, Yu Sam ^a   Shin, Hyun Chul ^a  

^a School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Lumbar spine; Microdiscectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Muscle sparing technique

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL SUBPERIOSTEAL MICRODISCECTOMY; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LEG PAIN; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE SPARING TRANSMUSCULAR MICRODISCECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 78149377102     PISSN: 20053711     EISSN: 15987876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.225     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anand N, Baron EM, Bray Jr RS: Benefits of the paraspinal musclesparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes. SAS Journal 1: 93-99, 2007
2. Anand N, Baron EM, Bray Jr RS: Modified muscle-sparing paraspinal approach for stabilization and interlaminar decompression: a minimally invasive technique for pedicle screw-based posterior nonfusion stabilization. SAS Journal 2: 40-42, 2008
3. Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, Peul WC: Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 7: 282-286, 2007
4. Brock M, Kunkel P, Papavero L: Lumbar microdiscectomy: subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption. Eur Spine J 17: 518-522, 2008
5. Caspar W: A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg 4: 152, 1977
6. Choi YY, Yoon SH, Ha Y, Kim EY, Park HC, Park CO: Posterior microscopic lesionectomy for lumbar disc herniation with tubular retraction using METRxTM system. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 40: 406-411, 2006
7. Dixon SH Jr, Fuchs JC, Ebert PA: Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase activity following thoracic, cardiac, and abdominal operations. Arch Surg 103: 66-68, 1971
8. Foley KT, Smith MM: Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3: 301-307, 1997
9. Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Nakamura H, Nakashima S, et al.: Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 19: 344-347, 2006
10. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H: Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22: 1018-1023, 1997
11. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Matsui H, et al.: Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21: 2683-2688, 1996
12. Kim YB, Hyun SJ: Clinical applications of the tubular retractor on spinal disorders. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42: 245-250, 2007
13. Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J: Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 13: E3, 2002
14. Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, Koldas M, Kural A, Bilge T: Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 6: 121-125, 2007
15. Riesenburger RI, David CA: Lumbar microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15: 267-270, 2006
16. Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, et al.: Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 15: 577-582, 2006
17. Schick U, Döhnert J, Richter A, König A, Vitzthum HE: Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study. Eur Spine J 11: 20-26, 2002
18. Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH: The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 8: 39-43, 2008
19. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A: Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18: 575-581, 1993
20. Taylor RS: Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 31: S13-S19, 2006
21. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE: The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50: 919-926, 1968